Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 1
UM-Bot

'Three-parent baby' could be born by 2015

15 posts in this topic

A change in regulations could soon make it possible for a baby to be born using the DNA from two mothers.

The UK is set to become the first country in the world to permit the procedure which is getting the go-ahead in the interests of preventing babies being born with debilitating conditions such as muscular dystrophy.

Read More: http://www.unexplained-mysteries.com/news/263049/three-parent-baby-could-be-born-by-2015

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's just what the world needs. Three parent babies. Not something useful.

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sounds like the beginning of the "Chromes" from Almost Human

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's just what the world needs. Three parent babies. Not something useful.

You may want to take a deeper look into this and what it stands for. I'm assuming you are a healthy person. Now if you were a person with a disease that could have been prevented using this technique, what would you have wanted your parents to have chosen. It's easy to say no when you are healthy but put yourself in someone else's shoes. There may be a confusion in parents but really a simple nuclear family are no longer the "norm" no matter how some may want that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the title is a bit misleading. I'm certain there will be scenarios involving lawful agreements, similar to adoption for example, in which one relinquishes their rights.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Would this work with either parent being two? As in two mothers or two fathers?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A change in regulations could soon make it possible for a baby to be born using the DNA from two mothers.

Read More: http://www.unexplain...be-born-by-2015

because custody and support battles aren't complicated enough
2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You may want to take a deeper look into this and what it stands for. I'm assuming you are a healthy person. Now if you were a person with a disease that could have been prevented using this technique, what would you have wanted your parents to have chosen. It's easy to say no when you are healthy but put yourself in someone else's shoes. There may be a confusion in parents but really a simple nuclear family are no longer the "norm" no matter how some may want that.

I get what they are trying to accomplish here. That being said, I don't believe they are looking at the full picture here. They are taking what has always been A+B=C & changing it to A+B+D= a hopefully perfected C. Unfortunately by adding this new variable it will mostly likely equate to E, which will most likely have it's own multitude of problems. I could be very wrong in my believing this, after all I'm no specialist in this field, but I predict complications from this further down the line. Edited by DumpsterJesus
2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I understand why they would want to develop a procedure like this, but....

Tampering with nature on this level always has unseen consequences. You may exchange mitochondrial DNA, but what if that causes other abnormalities in the epigenetics? You relieve one disease, but trigger another?

Kinda goes back to something my father always says..."Just because you can, doesn't mean you should."

3 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The first step to designer babies.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And now it begins…

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We live a brief span of years and then die. During this time, most of us work to leave a lasting legacy. We do this through our vocations and through our progeny. In this latter case, we can potentially provide hope where there was little hope. The real challenge is not the aberration of this procedure, but assuring that the world we provide to these new borns is the best we can "deliver."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I understand why they would want to develop a procedure like this, but....

Tampering with nature on this level always has unseen consequences. You may exchange mitochondrial DNA, but what if that causes other abnormalities in the epigenetics? You relieve one disease, but trigger another?

Kinda goes back to something my father always says..."Just because you can, doesn't mean you should."

How do you attempt to cure genetic diseases without modifying the genome? By doing nothing?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

amazing how no one is making a big issue about this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

getting the go-ahead in the interests of preventing babies being born with debilitating conditions such as muscular dystrophy.

who came out such crap excuse . this is simply an dna modify test on human subject.

after dolly the sheep , i knew this will come .it's just that i never though it will happen in my life time

Edited by kobolds

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 1

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.