fluxed Posted March 30, 2014 Author #101 Share Posted March 30, 2014 if you mean hilarious in a point and snicker sorta way then i agree Grow up. Im surprised at this forum, and how people are enabled to stir and spread negative vibes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hawken Posted March 30, 2014 #102 Share Posted March 30, 2014 (edited) This is your conclusion, not mine. My conclusion is based on US BEING THERE. Notice how many people here judge, even though they WERE NOT THERE. It is either an agenda, by a few pro-masons, or plain lack of maturity. I'm not knocking your sighting flux, i'm just showing you the stereo-types that come to these forums. some come with neutral minds...some come with their minds already made up before they read the post. My view of your sighting is an Unknown. Edited March 30, 2014 by Hawkin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fluxed Posted March 30, 2014 Author #103 Share Posted March 30, 2014 (edited) You're on the wrong website if you're looking for open minded skepticism with no preconceived opinions. But it seems i am in the correct topic. So should people not expect this and be wise to life on other worlds? Contrary to your above advice. What position are you in, to dictate the above advice? You speak for everyone, yet speak alone. Edited March 30, 2014 by fluxed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fluxed Posted March 30, 2014 Author #104 Share Posted March 30, 2014 He is completely detached from reality. The person informing others of royal history, is detached from reality? While the ones playing it down, are fully attached? Let it be seen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thorvir Posted March 30, 2014 #105 Share Posted March 30, 2014 Notice the addition 'delusional' to undermine. No, i have gone from UFO event to study haman history. I have researched kingship, and can relay my findings. If you don't like it, then you will not like the rest. But please , like others here, one post is enough to show you disagree. No need for undermining. Actually, you've done enough of your own undermining of your own by just posting your utter nonsense. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fluxed Posted March 30, 2014 Author #106 Share Posted March 30, 2014 Well, the *least* you could do is suggest an alternative.. For this sort of stuff and to ensure everything gets a good reception, I'd suggest Godlikeproductions, or failing that, a personal blog... I did not expect a good reception. At the same time i did not expect immature and hostile interactions to this extent. No problem. I will not rise to insults or undermining. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thorvir Posted March 30, 2014 #107 Share Posted March 30, 2014 (edited) The person informing others of royal history, is detached from reality? While the ones playing it down, are fully attached? Now you're catching on. Took you 8 pages and almost 90 posts to calm down finally. Edited March 30, 2014 by Hida Akechi 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Merc14 Posted March 30, 2014 #108 Share Posted March 30, 2014 (edited) Your attempts to undermine and distract are blatant. Oh I am not trying to do that, you seem quite distracted already with no help from me needed. Even more reason to suspect masonic activity. I make it clear that royalty educated the people , first as pagans. They converted to christ then forced us to convert. Any remaining pagans worshipping the pagan gods of royalty, would now be murdered by royalty [ witches etc...] You hoped i would not mention this factual history, im sure. [ Im sure this pro-mason knew this already though] The history of religious persecution is quite well documented and is no secret except to the uneducated. Is that what you are, an uneducated man that thinks he has stumbled onto some deep dark secret on a conspiracy forum? You can take classical history at any university and learn about religious persecution throughout the ages right up until today so just what in the hell are you going on about? Edited March 30, 2014 by Merc14 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fluxed Posted March 30, 2014 Author #109 Share Posted March 30, 2014 Your "research", like the "research" you have of scientists hiding the truth and atoms having spiritual energy? Delusional it is then. Notice Rlyeh does not pick up quantum mechanics? Would you rather trust the scientists, claiming they understand the quantum world even though it is unpredicable? All science must be based on predictable obersvations, if one is going to prove it as 'real'. I only suggest that the quantum world is in fact a number of finer energy levels - not just one 'quantum world/level'. These finer realms of energy interaction, are spiritual and require us to understand them as such. Else observing them will change the results[evidenced], thus making it unpredictable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fluxed Posted March 30, 2014 Author #110 Share Posted March 30, 2014 (edited) As the first recorded religion was pagan, that would make everyone descendants of pagans. I am pleased you concur. I am not please with the latter engineering of context - Rlyeh attempts to dissolve any responsibility of the royal family and its ancestors, by 'suggesting' it was the peoples religion - we caused paganism and royalty adopted it from us? You make me laugh Rlyeh - you well know what i am saying. Royalty was given paganism via hieroglyphics and the gods of anient Egypt. They alone, for thousands of years, were pagans. It was only later that the people adopted the religion. This religion spread around the world - the religion of the afterlife. This religion installed the class system, putting royalty at the top of society with the gods. You were saying? Edited March 30, 2014 by fluxed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fluxed Posted March 30, 2014 Author #111 Share Posted March 30, 2014 The person with common sense asks not "how did they do that?" but rather "why did they do that?". This depends on the desired outcome. Why engineer the question? Why would aliens want to visit us? What makes us worthy of examination? We're not even the masters of our own planet let alone worthy of being part of any "Galactic Federation". They would visit us, as they have been doing for thousands of years. Would you be so naive to think that they really were gods? Would you be so naive to think they are not curious beings and it would be shallow for you to tell us, what you think - this is not the same as what an alien might think. You are programmed with religious and class code, going back through your ancestors. The aliens, im sure, suffer not from this nonsense of judgement. They have no need for money or class. Technology and wisdom have taken them beyond human desires for land and power and wealth. Im sure a few alien beings are criminal and acquired UFO's without permission. Im sure the police continue to hunt them down. This is why i know in my heart, the aliens[gods] of ancient Egypt[and SA] were REMOVED, and did not leave on their own accord. This coincided with the royal genepool rushing to convert to a new religion. They knew their support mechanism was GONE. Hence, the royal freemasons call for 'the son of the morning' to return. They are waiting for aliens to come back and keep their promise but are in denial that their foundation of kingship, was FAKE and based on a group of criminals wanting control of the Earth. The shame is twofold - one being the murder of our ancestors in warfare etc.. when the truth comes out - truth = royal shame. Two, being fooled by a gang of criminal aliens into thinking they were divine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fluxed Posted March 30, 2014 Author #112 Share Posted March 30, 2014 More gibberish! And no I am not a freemason nor do I believe in your paranoid nonsense I am paranoid for seeing obelisks in London, and wondering what they are doing there? I am paranoid because i hear Amen in the church and ancient Egypt? dear.dear. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fluxed Posted March 30, 2014 Author #113 Share Posted March 30, 2014 This is just another illuminaty/freemasonry/royality/egypt-connection/Rothschild-paranoia thread. Have no other idea why this was placed in the UFO section than to use "UFO" as a decoy for windy speculations in another discipline, CT, simply just that. And, for my opinion, in a partial awkward and arrogant fashion by the thread opener. I bow down to your authority sir. yet another who fails to address the ancient royal family, but is quick enough to play down the rothschilds and illuminati. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thorvir Posted March 30, 2014 #114 Share Posted March 30, 2014 Okay, fluxed has nothing of substance to offer and can't back anything he's claimed, just a repetitive regurgitation of his own personal version of trolling, completely ignoring rational sense, and a desperate craving for attention. And he's making up stuff as he types--that much is very obvious. Oh, and here's a little secret: both of my grandfathers were Freemasons. Let's see how fluxed plays that one out, but he'll use it as some sort of material to support his position. Bet he'll get even stranger and more detached from reality... We should probably stop feeding his craving for importance. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fluxed Posted March 30, 2014 Author #115 Share Posted March 30, 2014 The OP should've thrown in Icke's reptilian alien bull****, his Illuminati gibberish would then be somewhat related to ETs. Engineering context again. You deem my UFO experience as untrustworthy or follow a disinformation agenda- one of the two. The latter is common ground for the freemason. I explained my experience and the outcome, to date. If you inform me that you deem my experience as rubbish, done is done, leave it and go stir on another thread. Why repeat your negatives? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fluxed Posted March 30, 2014 Author #116 Share Posted March 30, 2014 Great. That "david icke is right" poster got himself banned, I wonder if he re-joined as "fluxed". The D.I forum is full of masons. And what makes matter worse and raises serious questions; why is D.I, allowing freemasons to run wild on his own forum? When people join talking about royalty and freemasons, certain mods ban those telling the truth about the masons, and allow the masons to blatantly spray, like a hippo's tail. Even when the masons openly declare the fact??? I was enabled to return to this forum but out of PRINCIPLE , i will not return to such a MASON infested forum, where moderators support the very people they claim to help expose. SHAME ON THE D.I FORUM. I've said it before, i will say it again. And becuase of this, Mr Icke is finished as far as im concerned. I now see him as a component of the illuminati, evidenced with the forum. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
seeder Posted March 30, 2014 #117 Share Posted March 30, 2014 I am paranoid for seeing obelisks in London, and wondering what they are doing there? Is it paranoia to see an original London Bridge... in the states? What is it doing there? "London Bridge is a bridge in Lake Havasu City, Arizona, United States. It is a relocated 1831 bridge that formerly spanned the River Thames in London, England, until it was dismantled in 1967". WIKI Dont follow your reasoning at all Im afraid 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JGirl Posted March 30, 2014 #118 Share Posted March 30, 2014 Grow up. Im surprised at this forum, and how people are enabled to stir and spread negative vibes. i am quite grown up i assure youyou needn't mind me, you are so much more enlightened after all. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hawken Posted March 30, 2014 #119 Share Posted March 30, 2014 Flux, I believe you saw something but you can't just see a light in the sky and jump to conclusions and say Alien. But on the flip side one can't say airplane either if it hasn't been identified. Simply put...Unknown 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Purple Octopus Posted March 30, 2014 #120 Share Posted March 30, 2014 Sooooo....I get the feeling that if we don't agree with your mental diarrhea, you brand us as masons. Well then, I demand to be a Shriner 'cause they have cool fezzes and mini cars. 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Merc14 Posted March 30, 2014 Popular Post #121 Share Posted March 30, 2014 Flux, I believe you saw something but you can't just see a light in the sky and jump to conclusions and say Alien. But on the flip side one can't say airplane either if it hasn't been identified. Simply put...Unknown Honestly, I don't think he saw anything. Just read what he thinks he sees in the sky and then in his garden and how he and his friend react to it. It is obviously a complete fabrication but whether he is a huckster or hallucinating I can't say although, based on his way of communicating and his "all over the place" thought process, I suspect the later. He was banned from the David Ickes site, of all places. Question: How irrational do you have to be to get banned from the Ickes site? Answer: Very, very, very, very irrational. I 'm going to refrain from further responses because, as I said, I suspect this is a hallucination created by a troubled mind and my advice to Flux is he seek help from a licensed healthcare professional. 11 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sir Wearer of Hats Posted March 30, 2014 #122 Share Posted March 30, 2014 I am paranoid for seeing obelisks in London, and wondering what they are doing there? They're there on holiday like everyone else 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dr no Posted March 31, 2014 #123 Share Posted March 31, 2014 I am paranoid for seeing obelisks in London, and wondering what they are doing there? I am paranoid because i hear Amen in the church and ancient Egypt? dear.dear. Yes you are Sir,very paranoid! 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
seeder Posted March 31, 2014 #124 Share Posted March 31, 2014 He was banned from the David Ickes site, of all places. Question: How irrational do you have to be to get banned from the Ickes site? That should be the wake up call right there! 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rlyeh Posted March 31, 2014 #125 Share Posted March 31, 2014 Notice Rlyeh does not pick up quantum mechanics?Please don't bring up QM in relation to spirituality. All you're discussing is quantum woo.These finer realms of energy interaction, are spiritualand require us to understand them as such. If that was the case it would be the spiritualists conducting research and making discoveries. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts