zoser Posted April 9, 2014 #1 Share Posted April 9, 2014 Brien Foerster has been exploring the Peruvian elongated skulls for some time and particularly from the Paracas area. These characteristically have red hair and some have such extreme enlargement that they could not have been the result of artificial deformation practised elsewhere. The enlarged eyeball sockets and cranial sutres also indicate abnormal characteristics. Early DNA testing supports Foerster's hypothesis that these belong to a hominid hybrid and not to the conventional evolutionary human line. Type into youtube: Windows On The World: Brien Foerster Interview /Skull found in Peru Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zoser Posted April 9, 2014 Author #2 Share Posted April 9, 2014 (edited) It had mtDNA (mitochondrial DNA) with mutations unknown in any human, primate, or animal known so far. But a few fragments I was able to sequence from this sample indicate that if these mutations will hold we are dealing with a new human-like creature, very distant from Homo sapiens, Neanderthals and Denisovans. http://www.ancient-o...ased-incredible Edited April 9, 2014 by zoser Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr.United_Nations Posted April 9, 2014 #3 Share Posted April 9, 2014 debunked like a 100000000 times and its human dna Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr.United_Nations Posted April 9, 2014 #4 Share Posted April 9, 2014 It had mtDNA (mitochondrial DNA) with mutations unknown in any human, primate, or animal known so far. But a few fragments I was able to sequence from this sample indicate that if these mutations will hold we are dealing with a new human-like creature, very distant from Homo sapiens, Neanderthals and Denisovans. http://www.ancient-o...ased-incredible its 100% human, if you disagree feel free to email or write a letter to the dna testers explaning why that you think these are not 100% human dna or even human. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zoser Posted April 9, 2014 Author #5 Share Posted April 9, 2014 (edited) debunked like a 100000000 times and its human dna Wishful thinking I'm afraid. However, while cranial deformation changes the shape of the skull, it does not alter its volume, weight, or other features that are characteristic of a regular skull. The Paracas skulls, however, are different. The cranial volume is up to 25 percent larger and 60 percent heavier than conventional meaning they could not have been intentionally deformed through head binding/flattening. http://higherperspec...incredible.html Nothing I didn't already know. I'll leave the skeptics to squabble and flap over this one. Good luck. Edited April 9, 2014 by zoser Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zoser Posted April 9, 2014 Author #6 Share Posted April 9, 2014 its 100% human, if you disagree feel free to email or write a letter to the dna testers explaning why that you think these are not 100% human dna or even human. Be my guest. Good luck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Still Waters Posted April 9, 2014 #7 Share Posted April 9, 2014 It had mtDNA (mitochondrial DNA) with mutations unknown in any human, primate, or animal known so far. But a few fragments I was able to sequence from this sample indicate that if these mutations will hold we are dealing with a new human-like creature, very distant from Homo sapiens, Neanderthals and Denisovans. http://www.ancient-o...ased-incredible We already have a thread about this. Same source link too. http://www.unexplain...howtopic=262007 *Closed* Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts