Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 1
OverSword

6 reasons politicians believe they can lie

25 posts in this topic

From the article:

  1. Many politicians are narcissists. Though research on politicians is limited, it isn’t difficult to see the connection. Narcissists are arrogant, self-important, see themselves as special, require excessive admiration, have a sense of entitlement, and are exploitative. If it looks like a duck and sounds like a duck, it’s probably a duck. This constellation of narcissistic attributes causes them to believe that they are right and, even if they are not, they’re too smart to be caught or suffer the consequences. In other words, they believe their own BS. Case in point: As John Edwards, the former senator and vice presidential nominee, noted, “[My experiences] fed a self-focus, an egotism, a narcissism that leads you to believe you can do whatever you want.”
  2. Politicians know their followers will believe them, even in the face of irrefutable evidence to the contrary. Politicians and their adherents live in an echo chamber in which everyone watches the same news channel, listens to the same talk radio, reads the same newspapers and web sites, and hangs out with the same like-minded people. There exists an impermeable membrane that prevents conflicting information from entering. The content of the lies is also usually red meat for the politicians’ ravenous base who are only too happy to chew on it for days on end.
  3. People don’t want to hear the truth. Truth, as the saying goes, hurts and no one wants to hear things that threaten their existence, their beliefs, or that will make them uncomfortable. It is decidedly better for politicians to tell people what makes them feel comfortable. Why should politicians be the purveyors of bad news (and decrease the likelihood of getting people’s votes) when they can tell fairy tales with happy endings (which, of course, everyone wants) and come out the victor.
  4. The Internet never forgets. One of the unintended consequences of the Internet is that information, true or not, lives on forever and it is likely to continue to be believed even in the face of contradictory evidence. Research has shown, for example, that people are more likely to believe unsubstantiated rumors about a political candidate they oppose when read in emails and on blogs.
  5. Cognitive biases. Daniel Kahneman and others have demonstrated that the human mind engages in many cognitive tricks to help people be more efficient, reduce confusion and anxiety, and keep life simple and coherent. Examples include the confirmation bias which involves the inclination to seek out information that supports our own preconceived notions; the Semmelweis reflex which is the predisposition to deny new information that challenges our established views; and the overconfidence effect which involves unwarranted confidence in one’s own knowledge, just to name a few.
  6. If a lie is told enough times, people will assume it is true. It is not a stretch to understand why people would believe something if they hear it enough. People expect that lies will be disproved and fade away. So if the lies continue to be heard, people assume, then they must be true. Case in point: John Kerry being “Swift Boated” during the 2004 presidential campaign.

The rest of the article is here

4 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
 

The lies do tend to be discovered, though. For a major example right now, check out the Leland Yee story. Admittedly, some politicians do get away with their lies for long enough to cause all sorts of damage, but in the end, the truth will usually come out.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, but ALL politicians are narcissists, without a certain degree of narcissism nobody would take the task upon them.

4 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, but ALL politicians are narcissists, without a certain degree of narcissism nobody would take the task upon them.

Not all, but most I would say. There are a few politicians who used their influence for good. My prime example is William Wilberforce, a 19th century British parliamentarian. After almost single-handedly abolishing the slave trade, he went on to co-found the RSPCA, the world's first animal welfare institution, and advocate for other social concerns, child welfare being just one.

If anyone is interested in his story, I can send you a link to the 2006 movie Amazing Grace.

So the question is, where is our 21st century William Wilberforce ?

3 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not all, but most I would say. There are a few politicians who used their influence for good. My prime example is William Wilberforce, a 19th century British parliamentarian. After almost single-handedly abolishing the slave trade, he went on to co-found the RSPCA, the world's first animal welfare institution, and advocate for other social concerns, child welfare being just one.

If anyone is interested in his story, I can send you a link to the 2006 movie Amazing Grace.

So the question is, where is our 21st century William Wilberforce ?

And he had no need at all for public recognition, right?

Well, that is what narcissism is all about, especially when in the public eye.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And he had no need at all for public recognition, right?

Well, that is what narcissism is all about, especially when in the public eye.

No, from all accounts he was a humble man. After a religious conversion he wanted to drop out of public life all together but was dissuaded by John Newton, an Anglican clergyman, and author of the hymn Amazing Grace.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No, from all accounts he was a humble man. After a religious conversion he wanted to drop out of public life all together but was dissuaded by John Newton, an Anglican clergyman, and author of the hymn Amazing Grace.

Almost all religious denomination founders give themselves as humble people, while that at narcissism test they all score in the top range (in fact a high narcissism score is imperative to the success of a public figure).

Nobody does anything for nothing. And the less they want in return the more you can bet on a narcissistic personality.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nobody does anything for nothing. And the less they want in return the more you can bet on a narcissistic personality.

Wow, you're certainly in a cynical mood today.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow, you're certainly in a cynical mood today.

nope, that is past cynicism and generally known as realism.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Almost all religious denomination founders give themselves as humble people

William Wilberforce did not found a religion, he founded the RSPCA, because he cared about slaves, children and animals; those with no voice.

Nobody does anything for nothing. And the less they want in return the more you can bet on a narcissistic personality.

May I ask how you came by this "knowledge" ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

William Wilberforce did not found a religion, he founded the RSPCA, because he cared about slaves, children and animals; those with no voice.

May I ask how you came by this "knowledge" ?

Look what I studied under about me.

Edited by questionmark

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The lies do tend to be discovered, though. For a major example right now, check out the Leland Yee story. Admittedly, some politicians do get away with their lies for long enough to cause all sorts of damage, but in the end, the truth will usually come out.

These days the lies are uncovered.

But most politicians are from a time before the Internet was as big as it is, they don't quite get how easy the common man is finding it to disprove what they say. Case in point the *insert abuse here* in Queensland Australia. They've just launched a massive campaign to convince people that ports, mining and shipping aren't responsible for the damage to the Great Barrier Reef, except TWO of the three things they mention as being the major causes are the result of man's activities (the crown of thorn starfish are only on the reef because of shipping for example) and anyone who's read a textbook or uses the Internet can find that out.

A few years ago, their commentary (for want of a less inflammatory word then "propaganda") would have passed with little or no comment. Nowadays everyone has access to the facts.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would think the the main reason they think they can get away with lying, is because for the past 6,000 years or so... they have...

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would think the the main reason they think they can get away with lying, is because for the past 6,000 years or so... they have...

I've been saying this since Moses was a baby, ALL Politicians lie and cheat, they promise the earth until they get elected, then you may get a handful of mud.
1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've been saying this since Moses was a baby, ALL Politicians lie and cheat, they promise the earth until they get elected, then you may get a handful of mud.

Just think how screwed up things would be if they gave us everything they promise...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Q-Why do politicians lie?

A-Historical precedent.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They'll always lie when it involves the "other" woman, and those involved are usually caught with their pants down sooner or later. :no:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not all, but most I would say. There are a few politicians who used their influence for good.

Probably someone already pointed to this - But being narcissistic doesn't mean that the person can't "do good" in the general sense.

Anyway I agree with what the OP posted. To be involved in the politics the person must be highly self-oriented, somewhat arrogant and try to keep the high-horse attitude.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

Probably someone already pointed to this - But being narcissistic doesn't mean that the person can't "do good" in the general sense.

Anyway I agree with what the OP posted. To be involved in the politics the person must be highly self-oriented, somewhat arrogant and try to keep the high-horse attitude.

Ah, one who spotted it... in fact, being self centered and wanting public attention is a good incentive for "good" deeds (in quotes because good and bad are mighty relative), which does not mean that the person is actually doing it for the deed itself.

Edited by questionmark

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just think how screwed up things would be if they gave us everything they promise...

That wouldn't be fair because everyone would be happy except the Politicians, who would come across as honest for once in their lives.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Never give power to one who seeks it.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In # 3 and # 6 it talks about lies. People do seem to prefer a sugar coated lie over a harsh truth. And politicians use that to there advantage.

And sometimes if a bad situation develops and no one hears about it, then nothing is said so one remains silent knowing how it will impact others.

In that aspect, you're not telling the truth but not lying either.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't forget #7 because they are *******s.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Never give power to one who seeks it.

That would mean anarchy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

That would mean anarchy.

No It wouldn't. We give power to jury's and they don't want to be there ( at least most of them). Human beings are smart ( at least in principal :( ). We can figure it out.

Edited by White Crane Feather

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 1

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.