Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 4
bubblykiss

Matthew 27:52-56

29 posts in this topic

King James Bible

And the graves were opened; and many bodies of the saints which slept arose,

And came out of the graves after his resurrection, and went into the holy city, and appeared unto many.

Now when the centurion, and they that were with him, watching Jesus, saw the earthquake, and those things that were done, they feared greatly, saying, Truly this was the Son of God.

My father and I have argued about this part of Matthew for around 20 years. Over the years I have noted;

1. Imagine the economic implications of dead saints roaming around a city

2. Were their bodies whole or corrupted

3. Did they testify to Death of Christ

4. Why does no other ancient source mention the dead raising for "The King of Jews"

So what do you think of this chilling and always fascinating passage?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I always thought that these were the first fruits - as in Jewish agricultural tradition. But I suspected that they only were known by those familiar to them and they didn't hang around for long. They were witnesses of his resurrection and then they went their way to be in heaven. That has been my understanding but afaik there is no scriptural proof.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There are many things in the Bible that appear to have no relation to anything in history. Case in point, "the slaughter of the innocents." The Jews do not record any order from Rome to kill all baby boys of a certain age during one year (and there would have been a revolt if Rome had tried that) nor are there graveyards with an unusual number of male infants from that time period.

I think it's a "Holy Urban Legend", told many years after the fact, to add a sense of wonder to the event.

3 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What i reckon (as i so often do) is that's it's metaphorical, and the "Saints" are the prophets of old and the resurrection means that their prophecies were being fulfilled.

The reference to "Saints" is surely an anachronism, probably inserted by the translators (who, particularly in the KJV, were certainly not above doing such things) inserting some Christian theology, not necessarily to deceive, but probably to make the point more easily understandable.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

1. Imagine the economic implications of dead saints roaming around a city

2. Were their bodies whole or corrupted

There wouldn't be any.. side effects from this, because the Bible is talking about 'full body apparitions' = 100% visible spirits. Money is man made and has no effect in the afterlife.

3. Did they testify to Death of Christ

Oh yes.. We have many saints that refused to convert although they knew what awaits them.. Even in these days you can find videos of Christians getting slauthered.. I've seen videos that ****ed up my mood for weeks.

4. Why does no other ancient source mention the dead raising for "The King of Jews"

Don't know :P But that doesn't necessarily dismiss the Bible's sayings.

Edited by 7thTrumpet

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is just about every translation of the first line you could ever want;

New International Version

and the tombs broke open. The bodies of many holy people who had died were raised to life.

New Living Translation

and tombs opened. The bodies of many godly men and women who had died were raised from the dead.

English Standard Version

The tombs also were opened. And many bodies of the saints who had fallen asleep were raised,

New American Standard Bible

The tombs were opened, and many bodies of the saints who had fallen asleep were raised;

King James Bible

And the graves were opened; and many bodies of the saints which slept arose,

Holman Christian Standard Bible

The tombs were also opened and many bodies of the saints who had fallen asleep were raised.

International Standard Version

tombs were opened, and many saints who had died were brought back to life.

NET Bible

And tombs were opened, and the bodies of many saints who had died were raised.

Aramaic Bible in Plain English

Tombs were opened, and many bodies of the Saints who were sleeping arose.

GOD'S WORD® Translation

The tombs were opened, and the bodies of many holy people who had died came back to life.

Jubilee Bible 2000

and the graves were opened; and many bodies of the saints who slept arose

King James 2000 Bible

And the graves were opened; and many bodies of the saints that slept arose,

American King James Version

And the graves were opened; and many bodies of the saints which slept arose,

American Standard Version

and the tombs were opened; and many bodies of the saints that had fallen asleep were raised;

Douay-Rheims Bible

And the graves were opened: and many bodies of the saints that had slept arose,

Darby Bible Translation

and the tombs were opened; and many bodies of the saints fallen asleep arose,

English Revised Version

and the tombs were opened; and many bodies of the saints that had fallen asleep were raised;

Webster's Bible Translation

And the graves were opened, and many bodies of saints who slept, arose,

Weymouth New Testament

the tombs opened; and many of God's people who were asleep in death awoke.

World English Bible

The tombs were opened, and many bodies of the saints who had fallen asleep were raised;

Young's Literal Translation

and the tombs were opened, and many bodies of the saints who have fallen asleep, arose,

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What about the bodies of those that were burned and nothing left but ashes ? Or the beheaded and amputated ones that were scattered in different places ? The soul is intangible, therefore it cannot be scattered nor distorted. Keeping also in mind that the Bible talks about the salvation of our souls and eternal life (which can only be achieved in the spiritual world), I believe this line is a metaphor.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't know about economical, however dead bodies coming out of their graves, appearing to many and it only gets a short mention. No one else recorded it? Maybe the walking dead was a common occurrence back then.

3 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

King James Bible

And the graves were opened; and many bodies of the saints which slept arose,

And came out of the graves after his resurrection, and went into the holy city, and appeared unto many.

Now when the centurion, and they that were with him, watching Jesus, saw the earthquake, and those things that were done, they feared greatly, saying, Truly this was the Son of God.

My father and I have argued about this part of Matthew for around 20 years. Over the years I have noted;

1. Imagine the economic implications of dead saints roaming around a city

2. Were their bodies whole or corrupted

3. Did they testify to Death of Christ

4. Why does no other ancient source mention the dead raising for "The King of Jews"

So what do you think of this chilling and always fascinating passage?

More silly nonsense from that not so 'good' book!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here in Ft Myers, Florida we call it Zombie Con.

Zombicon-Fort-Myers-Crowds-300x199.jpg

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't know about economical, however dead bodies coming out of their graves, appearing to many and it only gets a short mention. No one else recorded it? Maybe the walking dead was a common occurrence back then.

By economical I mean this, if they were the literal flesh and blood bodies of dead humans returned from the voyage into death and you happened to encounter say your dead for the last 36 years grand father, who is talking about a guy you may not be aware of.....would you go to work that day? Is he 35 years of no drinking thirsty? Do bar tenders want to tend to the freshly risen dead who are talking about a messiah?

Did the dead need to eat or sleep? Who funded their meals and rest? Where and when did they go? Do you have to rebury them with all of the rituals and coffins and ossuary boxes or are all the old ones still good for the 2nd burial?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Personally I see this verse as being literal but not in the way people are reading it. The people who rose from the dead did not actually return to their bodies and resurrect as was the case of Jesus Christ.

I think this verse is illustrating something else entirely, that the holy dead were liberated from the grave or hades, also known as Abrahams bosom, or paradise.

This happened when Jesus was resurrected, thus of all the places in the realm of the dead, paradise (Abrahams bosom) is now empty, as all the people who did inhabit it arose to heaven with Jesus as the 1st fruits of the resurrection. They, however do not posses bodies as the resurrection will only occur in the future where all who are saved will recieve the eternal and uncorruptable bodies promised to us in scripture.

Thus it stands to reason that these people also walked the land as resurrected spirits and arose with Jesus when he rose to heaven, 40 days after his resurrection.

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Before that the curtain in the temple was torn in half that separated the people from God that Jesus tried to break down and teach no one is separated from the love of God. I think the writer meant when Jesus sacrifice his life on the cross the saints and people that had passed before were now aware of this sacrifice.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

King James Bible

And the graves were opened; and many bodies of the saints which slept arose,

And came out of the graves after his resurrection, and went into the holy city, and appeared unto many.

Now when the centurion, and they that were with him, watching Jesus, saw the earthquake, and those things that were done, they feared greatly, saying, Truly this was the Son of God.

My father and I have argued about this part of Matthew for around 20 years. Over the years I have noted;

1. Imagine the economic implications of dead saints roaming around a city

2. Were their bodies whole or corrupted

3. Did they testify to Death of Christ

4. Why does no other ancient source mention the dead raising for "The King of Jews"

So what do you think of this chilling and always fascinating passage?

I'll deal with the second point first: When Jesus raised Lazarus from the dead, his sister said that after four days in the tomb there would be a foul odor of decay. In fact Jesus said that He delayed his journey to see Lazarus so that His disciples might believe His claims. It might be easy to fake a resurrection or someone who had "died" only hours before, but impossible once decay had set in. So, Lazarus, though he had been dead four days did not come back as some "zombie" with rotting skin and organs and bones showing, he came back as he was before his sickness. This so alarmed the Jewish leaders who were trying to find ways to put Jesus to death that they decided they wanted to kill Lazarus as well. So as to whether those raised would be whole or corrupted, I would say this gives a clue that they came back whole.

Economically I would say there would be great joy, celebration and feasting if a loved one once dead and supposedly gone from you life forever suddenly is returned to you. That would be the positive impact. Fear would be the negative impact, as in, "Is this a ghost, is it the work of the devil, etcetera?" Probably more positive than negative once the identity of those raised was confirmed. We do not however, know the number of "many" and it may be a few dozen rather than multiple hundreds of thousands. If ten verifiably death and decaying individuals suddenly came out the grave today and walked the earth that alone would be amazing enough.

I would say yes, they testified of Christ: These were saints (and saint in the Scripture is any saved individual) who knew Christ and indeed may have seen Him quite recently during His earthly ministry.

As to why there are no extra-Biblical confirmations of Scripture, there have been many persons, places and events in the Bible that were once thought by secular scholars to be non-existant. King David is a good example. He was thought to be a fictional character until he was found mentioned in some ancient clay tablet. This event happened to believers in a time of hostility towards them, the authorities had managed to crucify Christ, scatter His followers and put many saints to death. It is possible that many of these individuals were kept out of sight by family and friends.

Also, nearly 2000 years have passed along with shifting control of the area in question many, many times, perhaps such evidence existed but exists no longer. We may never know.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't know about economical, however dead bodies coming out of their graves, appearing to many and it only gets a short mention. No one else recorded it? Maybe the walking dead was a common occurrence back then.

There's a lot in Matthew that is mentioned nowhere else. I get the idea he (the person who wrote what we call "Matthew") was more inventive in making up stories while the others stuck more strictly to the developing tradition.
1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'll deal with the second point first: When Jesus raised Lazarus from the dead, his sister said that after four days in the tomb there would be a foul odor of decay. In fact Jesus said that He delayed his journey to see Lazarus so that His disciples might believe His claims. It might be easy to fake a resurrection or someone who had "died" only hours before, but impossible once decay had set in. So, Lazarus, though he had been dead four days did not come back as some "zombie" with rotting skin and organs and bones showing, he came back as he was before his sickness. This so alarmed the Jewish leaders who were trying to find ways to put Jesus to death that they decided they wanted to kill Lazarus as well. So as to whether those raised would be whole or corrupted, I would say this gives a clue that they came back whole.

Economically I would say there would be great joy, celebration and feasting if a loved one once dead and supposedly gone from you life forever suddenly is returned to you. That would be the positive impact. Fear would be the negative impact, as in, "Is this a ghost, is it the work of the devil, etcetera?" Probably more positive than negative once the identity of those raised was confirmed. We do not however, know the number of "many" and it may be a few dozen rather than multiple hundreds of thousands. If ten verifiably death and decaying individuals suddenly came out the grave today and walked the earth that alone would be amazing enough.

I would say yes, they testified of Christ: These were saints (and saint in the Scripture is any saved individual) who knew Christ and indeed may have seen Him quite recently during His earthly ministry.

As to why there are no extra-Biblical confirmations of Scripture, there have been many persons, places and events in the Bible that were once thought by secular scholars to be non-existant. King David is a good example. He was thought to be a fictional character until he was found mentioned in some ancient clay tablet. This event happened to believers in a time of hostility towards them, the authorities had managed to crucify Christ, scatter His followers and put many saints to death. It is possible that many of these individuals were kept out of sight by family and friends.

Also, nearly 2000 years have passed along with shifting control of the area in question many, many times, perhaps such evidence existed but exists no longer. We may never know.

Except Lazarus was suffering from typhoid fever and placed in a cool cave, Jesus came to nurse his friend back to health and bring him back from the brink of death.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't know about economical, however dead bodies coming out of their graves, appearing to many and it only gets a short mention. No one else recorded it? Maybe the walking dead was a common occurrence back then.

What about biohazards?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

According to Jewish law a person could not partake Passover Feast if they touched blood or anything dead. As Jesus hung on the cross the earthquake caused graves to be opened. This insured no Jew ventured into the grave site to steal the body of Jesus and say He arose.

When Jesus died He descended to the depths of the earth where Paradise was at that time. Lucifer and his angels had not been thrown out of heaven until Jesus hung on the cross and there was war in heaven.

When Jesus arose from the grave He brought those in Paradise up with Him. He being the first fruits of the dead. Those whom He resurrected had their body changed into a body fit for eternal heaven. They walked the streets of Jerusalem and were seen by many. They ascended into heaven with Jesus. Now Paradise is in heaven.

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There are many things in the Bible that appear to have no relation to anything in history. Case in point, "the slaughter of the innocents." The Jews do not record any order from Rome to kill all baby boys of a certain age during one year (and there would have been a revolt if Rome had tried that) nor are there graveyards with an unusual number of male infants from that time period.

I think it's a "Holy Urban Legend", told many years after the fact, to add a sense of wonder to the event.

It was Herod, not Rome, who purportedly ordered the legendary 'slaughter of the innocents' (Matt. 2:16-17).

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It was Herod, not Rome, who purportedly ordered the legendary 'slaughter of the innocents' (Matt. 2:16-17).

And Herod was, to be entirely fair, pretty deranged by that time that it wouldn't have been beyond him. Obviously, it wouldn't have been as systematic and precise as it's made out to be (every child born on a particular day), but such was his paranoia by then (because of the illness that would before long kill him) that, like many tyrants through history, it would have been in character to have ordered some sort of round-up of children and innocents.
1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

When Jesus died He descended to the depths of the earth where Paradise was at that time. Lucifer and his angels had not been thrown out of heaven until Jesus hung on the cross and there was war in heaven.

So until then Nebuchadnezzar was best buds with God, and then he was thrown out of heaven? How did he get there in the first place?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So until then Nebuchadnezzar was best buds with God, and then he was thrown out of heaven? How did he get there in the first place?

I don't believe I mentioned ole Nebbie. I guess this is a useless question but...

Question: you said "so until then" -until what?

By one man (Lucifer) sin entered. He is the author of confusion, and confusion was evident when God saw "confusion and emptiness" of the face of the earth, which was after the beginning creation of heaven and earth but before the six day creation.

Lucifer coerced 1/3 of the angels to throw in with him and kill the infant Jesus when He was born. They failed. But they had showed themselves, now, as to which side they were on. They could no longer enter heaven.

As Jesus was in agony in the Garden of Gethsemane the angels were once again trying to snuff out His life before He could die as the Passover Lamb. (Jesus had told the disciples that they would see angels ascending and descending "upon Me". Ascending and descending upon Me, would be an act of aggression.) This was not the angels who were refreshing Him afterwards. He kept going back every hour to wake the disciples, so they could see this event. Angels are strong but Jesus by Himself was able to the point of sweating drops of blood -- was able to withstand them.

As Jesus hung on the cross Lucifer in desperation tried a heavenly coup. He met with resistance from Angel Michael and his angels.he lost the wae in heaven. It is settled. Lucifer has been caught and angels identified as to their allegiance.

Now Paradise has been moved to heaven. But Lucifer is confined to earth. He is like a roaring lion and constantly trying to devour Christians by tempting them and causing them to sin, which will give them a miserable life while on earth.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There are many things in the Bible that appear to have no relation to anything in history. Case in point, "the slaughter of the innocents." The Jews do not record any order from Rome to kill all baby boys of a certain age during one year (and there would have been a revolt if Rome had tried that) nor are there graveyards with an unusual number of male infants from that time period.

I think it's a "Holy Urban Legend", told many years after the fact, to add a sense of wonder to the event.

That s because come didn't issued that order. It was the king of the Jews heroic who issued that order. Judea was a protected but independent nation at his birth. A Hus death it back wasn't.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And Herod was, to be entirely fair, pretty deranged by that time that it wouldn't have been beyond him. Obviously, it wouldn't have been as systematic and precise as it's made out to be (every child born on a particular day), but such was his paranoia by then (because of the illness that would before long kill him) that, like many tyrants through history, it would have been in character to have ordered some sort of round-up of children and innocents.

The order was any male child up to the age of two, born in bethliham.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That s because come didn't issued that order. It was the king of the Jews heroic who issued that order.

Herod? damn spell checkers. :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 4

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.