Jump to content
Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -

Apollo Photos Are Proven Genuine


Waspie_Dwarf

Recommended Posts

Meticulous Visual Recreation Of Moon Landing Shows It Wasn't A Hoax

There was never a doubt in my mind that the Apollo moon missions were authentic. Apollo hoax claims relating to the Apollo missions have been successfully debunked with verifiable evidence.

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can never have too much evidence in the battle against ignorance or too much truth in the battle against lies.

Every new piece of evidence which shows how untenable the hoax theory claims are should be welcomed, not because it will stop the Apollo deniers spreading their false claims (it won't they gave up on reason, evidence and logic long ago) but because when someone with legitimate doubts asks a question there is a legitimate answer that can be provided.

I can only imagine the response from the Apollo hoax folks to this news.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can only imagine the response from the Apollo hoax folks to this news.

They'll do what they always do, which is one of two things:

  1. Stick their head in the sand, ignore the evidence and hope it goes away.
  2. Claim that the evidence can't be trusted (they'll probably claim that NVIDIA is controlled by the US Government/NWO and/or the Illuminati).

  • Like 9
Link to comment
Share on other sites

They'll do what they always do, which is one of two things:

  1. Stick their head in the sand, ignore the evidence and hope it goes away.
  2. Claim that the evidence can't be trusted (they'll probably claim that NVIDIA is controlled by the US Government/NWO and/or the Illuminati).

Judging by their past record, that can be expected. They also ignore photos of Apollo landing sites that were taken nations that have verified the Apollo missions as authentic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its a bit uncanny that the computer simulation looks more real than the original - just saying.

...when someone with legitimate doubts asks a question there is a legitimate answer that can be provided.

My question then is why are the shadows on the moon as black as space if the surface is so reflective? - just asking.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its a bit uncanny that the computer simulation looks more real than the original - just saying.

My question then is why are the shadows on the moon as black as space if the surface is so reflective? - just asking.

Good question. Hopefully we'll receive the answers soon.

Also, although I haven't really looked into this "Moon Landing Conspiracy", How did they get off the Moon without a launch pad?...

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also, although I haven't really looked into this "Moon Landing Conspiracy", How did they get off the Moon without a launch pad?...

Go here.

http://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=take+off+from+the+moon&qpvt=take+off+from+the+moon&FORM=VDRE#view=detail&mid=E60F996641BA3435ED85E60F996641BA3435ED85

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm assuming they took that miniature launch pad with them from Earth to the Moon? The video isn't really clear to someone new to this supposed conspiracy.

Also, it looks like they flew off and left the cameraman on the Moon... If the Moon landing is indeed real, it makes no sense to take off without a member of the crew.

Edit: Thanks for the link anyhow, Eagle.

Edited by Insaniac
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm assuming they took that miniature launch pad with them from Earth to the Moon?

It does not require a launch pad for a vehicle thats able to stand stabilised due to its design.

So no mobile miniature LC39 required on the Moon.

Edited by toast
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It does not require a launch pad for a vehicle thats able to stand stabilised due to its design.

So no mobile miniature LC39 required on the Moon.

That's what I thought, but it's a bit confusing. We live in what seems to be an age of deceit, so I wouldn't be surprised if this was a hoax.

Cheers.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's what I thought, but it's a bit confusing. We live in what seems to be an age of deceit, so I wouldn't be surprised if this was a hoax.

Cheers.

You have 'doubts'.

What have you done to educate yourself in this area and address those doubts?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It does not require a launch pad for a vehicle thats able to stand stabilised due to its design.

So no mobile miniature LC39 required on the Moon.

Since the moon has less gravity then the earth wouldn't that aid the vehicle in it's launch without a launch pad?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Since the moon has less gravity then the earth wouldn't that aid the vehicle in it's launch without a launch pad?

Yes. The ascent stage was designed to carry only what was needed so it was relatively light. Factor in a powerful hypergolic engine with the reduced lunar gravity, and it is plain ol' physics.

Edited by Obviousman
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Since the moon has less gravity then the earth wouldn't that aid the vehicle in it's launch without a launch pad?

Its not about gravity, its about balance. A vehicle thats able to stand stabilised due to its design does not require

external equipment to get stabilised. If the term launch pad is (wrongly) understood here as the tower that is fixing

a rocket b4 lift off, such tower would also be required on the Moon if the rocket itself is not designed to stand stable,

means without some kind of legs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here we go again ! Someday we just may see all these C.T`s just dry up and disappear . We can only educate !

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here we go again ! Someday we just may see all these C.T`s just dry up and disappear . We can only educate !

The Boxing Commission adopted Edwin Aldrin's right hook on Bart Sibrel. They call it the BuzzSaw. :w00t:

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's what I thought, but it's a bit confusing. We live in what seems to be an age of deceit, so I wouldn't be surprised if this was a hoax.

Cheers.

A hoax?! Impossible!

.

Edited by skyeagle409
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Boxing Commission adopted Edwin Aldrin's right hook on Bart Sibrel. They call it the BuzzSaw. :w00t:

Can we safely say that the recipient got a buzz from that right hook because he never saw it coming?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The launch pad/umbilical tower were not for guidance of the rocket being launched. (smaller fin guided sounding rockets using rail guides are the exception). The tower gave access to the various parts of the rocket requiring pre-flight access.

The LM departing the Moon simply lifted off the spent descent stage, which was essentially empty of fuel after providing propulsion for the landing. It required no further "pad" ot support structure for the lunar surface "launch".

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's what I thought, but it's a bit confusing. We live in what seems to be an age of deceit, so I wouldn't be surprised if this was a hoax.

Cheers.

If you think all the missions to the moon were fraudulent then what's your explanation for Apollo 13?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can only imagine the response from the Apollo hoax folks to this news.

No amount of evidence will convince the hardcore hoaxers, they are a lost cause. What this is about is stopping the creation of more of them and more evidence is always a good thing, especially when they are out of bullets. On a side note, this makes me want to go get a Maxwell based Nvidia card, what awesome parallel processing power and technology. Great find Waspie, thanks!

Edited by Merc14
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.