Doug1029 Posted July 15, 2016 #101 Share Posted July 15, 2016 13 hours ago, Thorvir Hrothgaard said: So the government should prosecute someone that denies gorebal warming then? And it is a political issue, intentionally so. It's been that way from the start. Gee, glad people weren't persecuted for not believing the world was flat either, back in the good old days, right? Prosecutions, if any, would be for fraud and could only be carried out if fraud was detected. As the First Amendment does not protect fraud, there is no conflict with it. Merc is trying to feed us a line of bull... Doug 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SHaYap Posted July 15, 2016 #102 Share Posted July 15, 2016 skepticentric views : Quote Scientific skepticism is healthy. Scientists should always challenge themselves to improve their understanding. Yet this isn't what happens with climate change denial. Skeptics vigorously criticise any evidence that supports man-made global warming and yet embrace any argument, op-ed, blog or study that purports to refute global warming. This website gets skeptical about global warming skepticism. Do their arguments have any scientific basis? What does the peer reviewed scientific literature say? skeptical science link : http://www.skepticalscience.com/ ~ Quote How We Know Global Warming is Real BY Dr. Tapio Schneider Dr. Tapio Schneider discusses the science behind human-induced climate change. He is a climate scientist and Professor of Environmental Science and Engineering at the California Institute of Technology. skeptic com link : http://www.skeptic.com/reading_room/how-we-know-global-warming-is-real/ ~ 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now