rashore Posted July 14, 2016 #1 Share Posted July 14, 2016 Quote Editor's note: This story was first published on April 28, 2016, and is being republished to mark the 50th anniversary of the murders. A couple of days after his basement flooded, John Schmale finally mustered the energy to head downstairs and investigate the damage. In the basement's dim overhead light, a big, brown cardboard box caught his eye, a box so soggy its bottom was ready to fall out. He lugged it upstairs. He opened it. Inside sat four square, off-white boxes labeled "Kodak," and on top of them lay a sheet of thin pink paper. He instantly recognized his mother's cursive handwriting. http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/ct-richard-speck-chicago-mass-murder-victims-20160421-story.html 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+OverSword Posted July 14, 2016 #2 Share Posted July 14, 2016 That's something that always bothers me. Everyone knows who Ted Bundy was but can you name one of his victims? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rashore Posted July 15, 2016 Author #3 Share Posted July 15, 2016 Most people cant name Bundy's victims or Specks victims. Or most other instances where the victims go over 2, maybe 3 people. It's just not within modern folks normal memory capabilities to remember lists of names like that. We don't memorize anymore like we did a century or two ago. And it's also easier to remember the monstrosity of one person, rather than the victimization of the group. Because most people don't remember the details of the crimes either, just a general gloss if they remember anything at all. Like with Speck, his victims are known at "the nurses", but a lot of people don't recall what happened to them other than Speck killed them. Maybe in a way it's collective memory instinct. Like with a poisonous snake, you might not remember who got bit and died, but you sure remember that snake- and in collective memory we all remember that poisonous snake and not those that died from the bite. Likewise with a killer, we remember the danger and not so much those that already fell to the danger, only that there were enough victims for that danger to remain stuck in our memory. In a way, that changes with a single victim. We have the tendency to remember a single victim much better, and the details- and sometimes we almost forget the killer in light of remembering the lone victim. Familicide seems to tend to stick in our memory differently too, and we have the tendency to remember the family entire rather than have a disconnect in memory between killer and victims. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Careful_perspective Posted July 15, 2016 #4 Share Posted July 15, 2016 18 hours ago, OverSword said: That's something that always bothers me. Everyone knows who Ted Bundy was but can you name one of his victims? I personally don't, even though I'm a True Crime aficionado. But I do remember the circumstances surrounding some of his victims. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now