Jump to content
Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -

What do you think happens when you die?


Leika

Recommended Posts

19 hours ago, Habitat said:

I don't consider it an open question at all, on the evidence available to me, but the details I have are sparse, I have no idea if everyone or even a lot "graduates", but I know some do. 

orly_owl.jpg

 

And how do you know this?

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 
1 hour ago, Podo said:

 

 

And how do you know this?

 

By observations of events that occurred following the death of a much-loved relative, including the fulfillment of a pact to signal the existence of the "beyond". I had no expectation at all, that that would be realised. I am not easily convinced at all, but I'd be a fool to ignore the numerous, overt "signs". You can rationalize it away as a deception, or a self-deception on my part, but you would be guessing wrong.

Edited by Habitat
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Habitat said:

By observations of events that occurred following the death of a much-loved relative, including the fulfillment of a pact to signal the existence of the "beyond". I am not easily convinced, but I'd be a fool to ignore the numerous, overt "signs". You can rationalize it away as a deception, or a self-deception on my part, but you would be guessing wrong.

Your inability to separate belief from proof is astounding. You believe these things, but you don't know them. Like you yourself have said, you're just another guesser.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Podo said:

Your inability to separate belief from proof is astounding. You believe these things, but you don't know them. Like you yourself have said, you're just another guesser.

No, my ability to separate belief from proof is very well developed, and all your post reveals is your determination to be closed-minded. I have seen ample evidence, and there is no other option, for me, but to accept that there is an afterlife for some at least. You have to reckon with the fact that events being not on open display, does not render them invalid or less real. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Habitat said:

No, my ability to separate belief from proof is very well developed, and all your post reveals is your determination to be closed-minded. I have seen ample evidence, and there is no other option, for me, but to accept that there is an afterlife for some at least. You have to reckon with the fact that events being not on open display, does not render them invalid or less real. 

False. I've never claimed that an afterlife doesn't exist. I've pointed out that there is no measurable or observable to think that consciousness persists after brain death. As I've stated previously, whether consciousness persists or not is irrelevant, because there is still no evidential reason to believe that it does. If you think otherwise, that's fine, but it's not proof, it is belief. Don't confuse the two.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Podo said:

False. I've never claimed that an afterlife doesn't exist. I've pointed out that there is no measurable or observable to think that consciousness persists after brain death. As I've stated previously, whether consciousness persists or not is irrelevant, because there is still no evidential reason to believe that it does. If you think otherwise, that's fine, but it's not proof, it is belief. Don't confuse the two.

I have seem more than enough evidence, you can worry about nit-picking whether it is a manifestation of persisting "consciousness", but who/whatever has orchestrated the demonstrations I have witnessed, has a remarkable knowledge of matters known only to myself and the deceased. I have no interest in technicalities of whether it constitutes "persistent consciousness".  A fool might believe they can penetrate this mystery by science and investigation, it is increasingly clear to me that we are the audience, not the actors, in this theatre. As to your statement that it "isn't relevant, because there is still no evidential reason", well, that is just nonsense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Habitat said:

I have seem more than enough evidence, you can worry about nit-picking whether it is a manifestation of persisting "consciousness", but who/whatever has orchestrated the demonstrations I have witnessed, has a remarkable knowledge of matters known only to myself and the deceased. I have no interest in technicalities of whether it constitutes "persistent consciousness".  A fool might believe they can penetrate this mystery by science and investigation, it is increasingly clear to me that we are the audience, not the actors, in this theatre. As to your statement that it "isn't relevant, because there is still no evidential reason", well, that is just nonsense.

You say it is nonsense, but you can't offer anything but vague anecdotes in response. You think that there is proof that consciousness exists after full brain-death? Prove it, then. If you can't, then you're exactly the same as every other human that has ever lived; you don't know. You may think you know, but you're "just another guesser" (your words, not mine). Belief is fine, but acknowledge the difference between belief and proof. It's not that hard, I promise.

Edited by Podo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Podo said:

You say it is nonsense, but you can't offer anything but vague anecdotes in response. You think that there is proof that consciousness exists after full brain-death? Prove it, then. If you can't, then you're exactly the same as every other human that has ever lived, and you don't know. You may think you know, but you're "just another guesser" (your words, not mine). Belief is fine, but acknowledge the difference between belief and proof. It's not that hard, I promise.

Anecdotes is all you will ever get, till you become a witness yourself. You are a victim of a dogma that says that which cannot be openly demonstrated, does not exist. I know better, so look upon scoffers as the fools they are. Doubters have my full approval, scoffers are just ignorant ratbags.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, Habitat said:

You don't know that, you are just another guesser.

The difference being that there is no evidential reason to think anything other than oblivion. 

 

2 minutes ago, Habitat said:

Anecdotes is all you will ever get, till you become a witness yourself. You are a victim of a dogma that says that which cannot be openly demonstrated, does not exist. I know better, so look upon scoffers as the fools they are. Doubters have my full approval, scoffers are just ignorant ratbags.

You can sling insults all you want, but your inability to separate belief from proof is clear. Ratbag I may be, but I only believe things that have supporting evidence to back them up. But by all means, enjoy your superstition. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Habitat said:

Anecdotes is all you will ever get, till you become a witness yourself. You are a victim of a dogma that says that which cannot be openly demonstrated, does not exist. I know better, so look upon scoffers as the fools they are. Doubters have my full approval, scoffers are just ignorant ratbags.

My witnessing (twice) tells me that there is nothing. Sleep is just a little dose of death before the final slumber.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Podo said:

The difference being that there is no evidential reason to think anything other than oblivion. 

 

You can sling insults all you want, but your inability to separate belief from proof is clear. Ratbag I may be, but I only believe things that have supporting evidence to back them up. But by all means, enjoy your superstition. 

You tell me, are you a doubter, or just a scoffer ? If the answer is the latter, your education has been a wretched failure. Because the only "reasonable" attitude, would be to doubt, allowing that it might be a true account, it might be a total fabrication, or something in between with no way of knowing which. But to come down either on the side of blind acceptance, or total dismissal of it, would be wrong-headed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, XenoFish said:

My witnessing (twice) tells me that there is nothing. Sleep is just a little dose of death before the final slumber.

I make no claims for what happens to everyone, only for what seemingly happens to some. Maybe we won't be re-cycled.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 
2 minutes ago, Habitat said:

You tell me, are you a doubter, or just a scoffer ? If the answer is the latter, your education has been a wretched failure. Because the only "reasonable" attitude, would be to doubt, allowing that it might be a true account, it might be a total fabrication, or something in between with no way of knowing which. But to come down either on the side of blind acceptance, or total dismissal of it, would be wrong-headed.

Doubt. Always doubt. I have said many times that I don't dismiss any sort of afterlife. One either exists or does not, our opinions and observations are irrelevant to its reality. However, there is no reason to think one exists due to a lack of evidence. If that changes? I'll change my tune. But there is currently nothing testable or observable saying othwrwise. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We're all recycled. It's called fertilizer. Born from the star to them all will return. Until the death of everything.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Podo said:

Doubt. Always doubt. I have said many times that I don't dismiss any sort of afterlife. One either exists or does not, our opinions and observations are irrelevant to its reality. However, there is no reason to think one exists due to a lack of evidence. If that changes? I'll change my tune. But there is currently nothing testable or observable saying othwrwise. 

Glad to hear you are a doubter, that is the only way to be, but don't kid yourself it will come into the realm of science, and you will get evidence that way. If that were going to happen, it would long ago. So don't assume it must be testable, or void. You are dallying with the idea that this has to jump your hurdles. I suspect the very opposite, you have to jump it's hurdles, or see nothing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Habitat said:

Glad to hear you are a doubter, that is the only way to be, but don't kid yourself it will come into the realm of science, and you will get evidence that way. If that were going to happen, it would long ago. So don't assume it must be testable, or void. You are dallying with the idea that this has to jump your hurdles. I suspect the very opposite, you have to jump it's hurdles, or see nothing.

Sorry if you already mentioned it, but I'm curious now what your personal story is about the dead confirming things for you?

I don't want to argue. Just curious

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it will be one of 2 things. It will either be lights out for eternity, just like being asleep but you never ever wake up or you'll exist as something or someone else in a different time, different place and a different when or possibly in the same universe, babies are born all the time ;-). I don't mean reicarnation just an existance, just like you have today, i mean it happened to you once to be in existance so it's possible at some stage it could happen again,  as long as atoms exist .

Edited by micky 32
Link to comment
Share on other sites

to hell you wont go, but maybe you can just turn a rotten meat

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Imagine yourself, your brain, as your hardrive in your computer. Unplug your computer. Hardrive stop and there's nothing. It's done.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/16/2016 at 10:35 PM, StarMountainKid said:

The objection I have with NDE's is that they're near death experiences, not after death experiences.

Except some who have been pronounced dead, floated down the hall and outside while their body lay on a gurney with a sheet over their head.  While floating around they see specific events and hear conversations.  When they are revived, they repeat events and conversations down to undeniable details.

So, those NDEs are worth noting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On July 29, 2016 at 8:08 PM, SSilhouette said:

Except some who have been pronounced dead, floated down the hall and outside while their body lay on a gurney with a sheet over their head.  While floating around they see specific events and hear conversations.  When they are revived, they repeat events and conversations down to undeniable details.

So, those NDEs are worth noting.

Why? The reason they can be revived is that their neurons are still firing. 

Cheers,

Badeskov

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A bit late, and I'm sure it's been said: Simply, the end of our bodies biological process.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.