Dark_Grey Posted July 25, 2016 #1 Share Posted July 25, 2016 Above: Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders share a worried glance as the Democratic party struggles over controversial email leak. She sure knows how to pick 'em. http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presidential-race/2016/07/23/clinton-vp-pick-tim-kaines-islamist-ties/ http://www.thefederalistpapers.org/us/tim-kaines-long-deep-relationship-with-radical-islam Third alt link, very thick in the bias Quote Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton’s newly-announced running mate, Virginia Senator Tim Kaine, has a history of embracing Islamists. He appointed a Hamas supporter to a state immigration commission; spoke at a dinner honoring a Muslim Brotherhood terror suspect; and received donations from well-known Islamist groups. Follow along, kids. Keep your arms and legs inside the ride at all times. No flash photography, please. Quote In 2007, Kaine was the Governor of Virginia and, of all people, chose Muslim American Society (MAS) President Esam Omeish to the state’s Immigration Commission. A Muslim organization against Islamism criticized the appointment and reckless lack of vetting. Who is the Muslim American Society? Quote Federal prosecutors said in a 2008 court filing that MAS was “founded as the overt arm of the Muslim Brotherhood in America.” A Chicago Tribune investigation in 2004 confirmed it, as well as MAS’ crafty use of deceptive semantics to appear moderate. Convicted terrorist and admitted U.S. Muslim Brotherhood member Abdurrahman Alamoudi testified in 2012, “Everyone knows that MAS is the Muslim Brotherhood.” So Kaine chose a known Islamist to head his state's Immigration Commission. Interesting. Let's continue: Quote In September 2011, Kaine spoke at a “Candidates Night” dinner organized by the New Dominion PAC that presented a Lifetime Achievement Award for Jamal Barzinji, who the Global Muslim Brotherhood Watch describes as a “founding father of the U.S. Muslim Brotherhood.” Maybe Tim is just a very poor judge of character? (Also, why was an Islamist tied to a known terror group being presented with a Lifetime Achievement Award?) Quote Barzinji’s organization, IIIT, donated $10,000 in 2011 to the New Dominion PAC, the organization that held the event honoring Barzinji that Kaine spoke at. The Barzinji-tied New Dominion PAC donated $43,050 to Kaine’s gubernatorial campaign between 2003 and 2005. That figure doesn’t even include other political recipients that assisted Kaine’s campaign. The PAC has very strong ties to the Democratic Party in Virginia, with the Virginia Public Access Project tallying almost $257,000 in donations. This likely explains why Barzinji’s grandson served in Governor McAuliffe’s administration and then became the Obama Administration’s liaison to the Muslim-American community. Ah. So Tim knows exactly what he's doing. He's fundraising! #HILLARY2016 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Space Commander Travis Posted July 25, 2016 #2 Share Posted July 25, 2016 Yes, we know how much Hillary hates Israel, so of course she'd appoint a supporter of Hamas as her running mate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bubblykiss Posted July 25, 2016 #3 Share Posted July 25, 2016 Can we build a wall around him and force Islam to pay for it? 8 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sweetpumper Posted July 25, 2016 #4 Share Posted July 25, 2016 Shocker. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SHaYap Posted July 25, 2016 #5 Share Posted July 25, 2016 So are we waitin' on a cross over or a tie in ? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sweetpumper Posted July 25, 2016 #6 Share Posted July 25, 2016 Whatever brings us closer to allah. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dark_Grey Posted July 25, 2016 Author #7 Share Posted July 25, 2016 You can't under-appreciate the dichotomy of this election. On one side, we have people bending over backwards to appeal to Islamists and on the other side are people doing everything they can to identify it as the problem. Meanwhile, Islamic terrorism actually has become a real problem. We either risk a total Police state solution to terrorism or a deliberately ignorant administration that will allow it to happen on American soil. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sir Wearer of Hats Posted July 25, 2016 #8 Share Posted July 25, 2016 It really looks like both sides are doing their best to ensure the other side wins the election. 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+and-then Posted July 25, 2016 #9 Share Posted July 25, 2016 1 hour ago, Otto von Pickelhaube said: Yes, we know how much Hillary hates Israel, so of course she'd appoint a supporter of Hamas as her running mate. Not so fast. US Jewry ALWAYS supports the Dem ticket - ALWAYS. She probably realizes she has nothing to lose. Even the Jews in Israel supported her over Trump - at least prior to this little story. We'll see how it all works out for her. My guess is that she'll win this election but it's beginning to look like the country is SO divided it may lead to violence - whoever wins... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+and-then Posted July 25, 2016 #10 Share Posted July 25, 2016 1 hour ago, bubblykiss said: Can we build a wall around him and force Islam to pay for it? Sometimes there's nothing left to do BUT try to laugh. I tell you though, God forbid but if we have a major casualty event caused Islamists between now and November, this little tidbit could cost her the election. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leonardo Posted July 25, 2016 #11 Share Posted July 25, 2016 Israel doesn't appear to have any particular issue with followers of Sunni Islam, and the Muslim Brotherhood is a Sunni group. So, it stands to reason the Dems wouldn't have any problem with appointing Sunni Muslims to hold an office in a State govt, or "get friendly" with Sunni Muslim figures - even if they have somewhat questionable backgrounds. As far as the US govt is concerned the "evil Muslims" are the Shias (Iran and Syria - Libya was a "special case") - even though the current high-profile terrorist/extremist groups in Islam are all Sunni. So, I don't see Kaine having ties to a Sunni organisation that isn't noted for terrorism against either Israel or the West as being particularly a big deal. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thedutchiedutch Posted July 25, 2016 #12 Share Posted July 25, 2016 This reminds me of Bush ties to the Bin Laden family ? Anyone remember ? 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SHaYap Posted July 26, 2016 #13 Share Posted July 26, 2016 ~ ~ 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
questionmark Posted July 26, 2016 #14 Share Posted July 26, 2016 (edited) 9 hours ago, Leonardo said: Israel doesn't appear to have any particular issue with followers of Sunni Islam, and the Muslim Brotherhood is a Sunni group. So, it stands to reason the Dems wouldn't have any problem with appointing Sunni Muslims to hold an office in a State govt, or "get friendly" with Sunni Muslim figures - even if they have somewhat questionable backgrounds. As far as the US govt is concerned the "evil Muslims" are the Shias (Iran and Syria - Libya was a "special case") - even though the current high-profile terrorist/extremist groups in Islam are all Sunni. So, I don't see Kaine having ties to a Sunni organisation that isn't noted for terrorism against either Israel or the West as being particularly a big deal. Its election time, so the favorite hobby in the next 100 days will be to fling some mud hoping it will stick. Most of it will not only not stick but miss the target by a mile. Edited July 26, 2016 by questionmark 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dark_Grey Posted July 26, 2016 Author #15 Share Posted July 26, 2016 4 hours ago, questionmark said: Its election time, so the favorite hobby in the next 100 days will be to fling some mud hoping it will stick. Most of it will not only not stick but miss the target by a mile. Except in Hillary's case. Shes sitting over the dunk tank and there is a big basket of balls waiting for any one who wants to have a throw. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Farmer77 Posted July 26, 2016 #16 Share Posted July 26, 2016 17 hours ago, Dark_Grey said: Above: Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders share a worried glance as the Democratic party struggles over controversial email leak. She sure knows how to pick 'em. http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presidential-race/2016/07/23/clinton-vp-pick-tim-kaines-islamist-ties/ http://www.thefederalistpapers.org/us/tim-kaines-long-deep-relationship-with-radical-islam Third alt link, very thick in the bias Follow along, kids. Keep your arms and legs inside the ride at all times. No flash photography, please. Who is the Muslim American Society? So Kaine chose a known Islamist to head his state's Immigration Commission. Interesting. Let's continue: Maybe Tim is just a very poor judge of character? (Also, why was an Islamist tied to a known terror group being presented with a Lifetime Achievement Award?) Ah. So Tim knows exactly what he's doing. He's fundraising! #HILLARY2016 Those must be the good radical islamists! I mean in todays world all Americans are tied to radical islam through our actions in Syria but theyre good radical terrorists right? Same thing applies here im sure Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RavenHawk Posted July 26, 2016 #17 Share Posted July 26, 2016 18 hours ago, and then said: I tell you though, God forbid but if we have a major casualty event caused Islamists between now and November, this little tidbit could cost her the election. I suspect that it truly is not a matter of if, but of when and soon and often. I still expect Obama to eventually declare martial law and suspend the elections. That will effectively nullify the Constitution. Stand by... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
White Unicorn Posted July 26, 2016 #18 Share Posted July 26, 2016 9 hours ago, questionmark said: Its election time, so the favorite hobby in the next 100 days will be to fling some mud hoping it will stick. Most of it will not only not stick but miss the target by a mile. And Hillary thought he was a middle road Democrat with no scandals to reveal during campaign! Look at the mud sling now, here goes the polsters again after Trump runs with this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+and-then Posted July 26, 2016 #19 Share Posted July 26, 2016 3 hours ago, RavenHawk said: I suspect that it truly is not a matter of if, but of when and soon and often. I still expect Obama to eventually declare martial law and suspend the elections. That will effectively nullify the Constitution. Stand by... I understand your reasoning but I think that's the least likely event. I cannot imagine that he has enough real allies in the military to not be dragged from that office (possibly at room temperature) if he tried that. The only way he pulls that off is if a truly devastating - potentially existential - attack occurred that required implementing COG protocols. I'd be curious to know if any succession plans are included within those continuity of government plans. Interesting question. No, after reading HILLARY'S AMERICA (D'Souza) I realize they really are just a criminal element. TRULY criminal. Grifters on an unsurpassed scale and it's the dumbing down of America that made it possible. If he DOES implement martial law all I can do is paraphrase Jefferson: When tyranny becomes law, rebellion becomes duty. Then take a few of his/her enforcers with me as I leave the stage. If America is to end like THIS, I wouldn't want to be here anyway. Bring the pain, baby! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gromdor Posted July 26, 2016 #20 Share Posted July 26, 2016 Why would he bother trying to become Eternal Dictator of the US when he can just wander around and collect millions in speaking fees? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RavenHawk Posted July 26, 2016 #21 Share Posted July 26, 2016 20 minutes ago, Gromdor said: Why would he bother trying to become Eternal Dictator of the US when he can just wander around and collect millions in speaking fees? Because he still needs to punish the evil America. America must be brought to her knees. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dark_Grey Posted July 26, 2016 Author #22 Share Posted July 26, 2016 32 minutes ago, and then said: I understand your reasoning but I think that's the least likely event. I cannot imagine that he has enough real allies in the military to not be dragged from that office (possibly at room temperature) if he tried that. The only way he pulls that off is if a truly devastating - potentially existential - attack occurred that required implementing COG protocols. I'd be curious to know if any succession plans are included within those continuity of government plans. Interesting question. No, after reading HILLARY'S AMERICA (D'Souza) I realize they really are just a criminal element. TRULY criminal. Grifters on an unsurpassed scale and it's the dumbing down of America that made it possible. If he DOES implement martial law all I can do is paraphrase Jefferson: When tyranny becomes law, rebellion becomes duty. Then take a few of his/her enforcers with me as I leave the stage. If America is to end like THIS, I wouldn't want to be here anyway. Bring the pain, baby! Like the gun store owner in GTA: IV once told me, "stay safe, stay Second Amendment." 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gromdor Posted July 26, 2016 #23 Share Posted July 26, 2016 21 minutes ago, RavenHawk said: Because he still needs to punish the evil America. America must be brought to her knees. We are getting Hillary or Trump. I think America is getting punishment enough. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RavenHawk Posted July 26, 2016 #24 Share Posted July 26, 2016 3 minutes ago, Gromdor said: We are getting Hillary or Trump. I think America is getting punishment enough. There is a gulf of a difference between the two. Trump has the character and mindset needed, which Hilary is completely unarmed. The question will be if Trump is capable of fixing the damage that Obama has done?? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+and-then Posted July 26, 2016 #25 Share Posted July 26, 2016 1 hour ago, Gromdor said: We are getting Hillary or Trump. I think America is getting punishment enough. Seriously, man - SERIOUSLY - you (and everyone else) should read HILLARY'S AMERICA. It's a history of the Democrat party and Hillary's place as it's leader today. I learned a tremendous amount. For one thing, my first reaction to the removal of Jackson from the $20 note to be replaced by Harriet Tubman was that I was angry that the Left was once again trying to destroy a little more of our history and change it to reflect their take on the past. WRONG! Jackson was an incredibly dishonest and brutal man. He used the US Cavalry to steal Indian land to then sell to cronies. He got votes AND rich. The man was worth 100 million when he died. And oh by the way... Democrat. As were all the governors and Senators that supported slavery, the re enslavement of blacks after the Civil War and on into today keeping them on the Democrat plantation. Every other ethnic minority or foreign national citizen group that has come to this country from outside has surpassed economically this one group of citizens who have been loyal (and dependent) on the Democrat party since the 60's. They don't seem to understand that they're STILL slaves. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now