docyabut2 Posted October 27, 2016 #1 Share Posted October 27, 2016 http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2016/10/27/sneak-peek-who-killed-jonbenet-new-tv-special-profiles-patsy-ramsey.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lilly Posted October 27, 2016 #2 Share Posted October 27, 2016 The primary investigation was badly botched, evidence was compromised and/or over looked. IMO, unless someone confesses we'll never know for sure. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
docyabut2 Posted October 27, 2016 Author #3 Share Posted October 27, 2016 Right if only this unknown DNA is found. we will never know Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Regi Posted October 28, 2016 #4 Share Posted October 28, 2016 15 hours ago, docyabut2 said: Right if only this unknown DNA is found. we will never know You know, according to the Dept. Of Justice, it's possible that a match has been collected and is either not yet processed or is processed and not yet entered. https://www.justice.gov/ag/advancing-justice-through-dna-technology-using-dna-solve-crimes *** On 10/27/2016 at 7:07 AM, docyabut2 said: http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2016/10/27/sneak-peek-who-killed-jonbenet-new-tv-special-profiles-patsy-ramsey.html I'd definitely recommend that book to anyone interested in this case. http://www.wehaveyourdaughter.net/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maureen_jacobs Posted October 28, 2016 #5 Share Posted October 28, 2016 Just ordered it via Amazon Kindle Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
docyabut2 Posted October 29, 2016 Author #6 Share Posted October 29, 2016 http://www.aol.com/article/entertainment/2016/10/28/report-dna-cited-to-clear-jonbenet-ramsey-family-in-murder-in-q/21594404/ he Boulder Daily Camera, in conjunction with Denver television station KUSA-TV, said the results an outside laboratory conducted on DNA found in the slain girl's clothing contained genetic markers from two people. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
docyabut2 Posted October 29, 2016 Author #7 Share Posted October 29, 2016 I always thought it could be two perpetrators , being that there were two unidentified shoe prints in the wine cellar where JB was killed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Regi Posted October 29, 2016 #8 Share Posted October 29, 2016 (edited) 10 hours ago, docyabut2 said: http://www.aol.com/article/entertainment/2016/10/28/report-dna-cited-to-clear-jonbenet-ramsey-family-in-murder-in-q/21594404/ he Boulder Daily Camera, in conjunction with Denver television station KUSA-TV, said the results an outside laboratory conducted on DNA found in the slain girl's clothing contained genetic markers from two people. I don't know what to make of such info. because in the first place- to my knowledge, Bode Lab. obtained a full STR profile. Edit: The reason I believe I know this to be a fact is because such info. was included in a promo. ad. for the laboratory. Edited October 29, 2016 by regi Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+ouija ouija Posted October 29, 2016 #9 Share Posted October 29, 2016 http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3883458/New-analysis-JonBenet-evidence-suggests-Ramsey-family-NOT-cleared-based-DNA-results-traces-multiple-people-victim-s-clothes.html Up to date information about the DNA on Jonbenet's underwear: it is from multiple people. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Regi Posted October 29, 2016 #10 Share Posted October 29, 2016 ^ Why do you say that's up to date info? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+ouija ouija Posted October 29, 2016 #11 Share Posted October 29, 2016 ^ ^ Because original examination of the DNA concluded that it belonged to just one male and not a male Ramsey, therefore the hunt was on for a male suspect who has never been found. At that time Boulder District Attorney Mary Lacy pronounced that the Ramseys could be excluded as suspects. This new examination gives the conclusion that whilst the Ramseys cannot be excluded as suspects, one or several of them cannot conclusively be accused of the crime. I'm assuming this is new information because it was in the news today! Have you seen it before? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Regi Posted October 29, 2016 #12 Share Posted October 29, 2016 ^No, but I don't take info. to the bank merely because it's the latest news. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
docyabut2 Posted October 30, 2016 Author #13 Share Posted October 30, 2016 I don't think the DNA from JB`s clothes are that important from one or two unknown males DNA`s . What is important is unknown DNA was found matching on her. in three different places on her clothing that night she went to bed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
liviab Posted December 26, 2016 #14 Share Posted December 26, 2016 On 10/27/2016 at 6:03 PM, docyabut2 said: Right if only this unknown DNA is found. we will never know i think some dna was found Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
liviab Posted December 26, 2016 #15 Share Posted December 26, 2016 On 10/29/2016 at 1:31 PM, ouija ouija said: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3883458/New-analysis-JonBenet-evidence-suggests-Ramsey-family-NOT-cleared-based-DNA-results-traces-multiple-people-victim-s-clothes.html Up to date information about the DNA on Jonbenet's underwear: it is from multiple people. maybe yeah like men who were pervs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Narcisse Posted December 27, 2016 #16 Share Posted December 27, 2016 This case will never be solved unfortunately. Inconsistent work done by the investigators and too much speculation, innuendo and outright manipulation by the media has been done to ever ensure a conviction at this point anyway. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cluey Posted January 21, 2017 #17 Share Posted January 21, 2017 so the unknown DNA.....is someone that has never been caught before or after the crime.......or he has passed away.......or actually never commited another crime.......well the perp....prior to that might well have but with no DNA or finger prints will be impossible to find...........at least she is resting in peace with her mother........ 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now