ChrLzs Posted December 7, 2016 #26 Share Posted December 7, 2016 5 hours ago, geraldnewfie said: typical american picking up for their gov who secretly hides everything! If they hide everything, then you wouldn't even know they existed. So that's a very, very silly thing to say, and shows you are a bit of an exaggerator..... 5 hours ago, geraldnewfie said: if you believe what they tell ya then your sir needs a ct scan on your head... And you sir, are a little off the planet if you seriously believe everything is a lie. I'm guessing you've not had the best of times dealing with the gubmint.. and that sorta suggests something to me... and it's not necessarily all about the gubmint being a bit naughty.... 5 hours ago, geraldnewfie said: and you think this team will release info to the pubic without the gov having their hands in it first then your in denial... And tell me, gerald, how long have you been interested in astronomy? Not long I suspect... Did you know that NASA often farms out their data collection to organisations like Universities? That the transmissions are usually not encrypted and given a reasonable quality receiver setup, any amateur can intercept the incoming data, quite legally? NASA do NOT hide this data at all. They do sometimes hold back data to allow their own scientists to make discoveries (that's only fair - they paid for and developed the spacecraft and technology!) but it is normally in conjunction with the University or collection agency - if you really wanted to get at the data, you could. It's a pity you didn't know that... 5 hours ago, geraldnewfie said: they will release it 24 hrs later like all rover images after they photoshop them, and a hoax hey? Can you point out any that you think are photoshopped? Can you also explain why NASA, who would get a HUGE increase in funding at the first sign of off-planet life, would hide something exciting like that? 5 hours ago, geraldnewfie said: well there is still questions about the landing that aint answered ASK YOUR BEST ONE. Right now. And let's see how good your knowledge is, Gerald. If what you think is the 'best' evidence of hoaxery is shown as incorrect and/or ignorant, then the implication is pretty obvious. So, be brave and post the best evidence you've seen. 5 hours ago, geraldnewfie said: and if they did, what did they find, why a few mins on a different channel that the pubic couldnt listen to, why did 3 of them look so despressed and scared when they arrived back? hiding something? Tired??? Good Grief, that has to be the lamest 'evidence' I've heard. 'Your client looks a little tired, Mr Lawyer" 'Well, he spent the last several days in a spacecraft that successfully landed on the Moon, and performed time sensitive experiments, walked on the Moon in a big and uncomfortable spacesuit, ate dried food, didn't get a whole lot of sleep...' 'Sorry, not good enough for Gerald - so GUILTY!!!' 5 hours ago, geraldnewfie said: if we went up there and came back we be excited but not them. so question is did they go up? or was it they are good actors saying they did? why so long to go back up? why after roswell we decided to go up then wait till now? anyways ..that garbage isn't even worth the effort to post a facepalm... 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Merc14 Posted December 7, 2016 Author #27 Share Posted December 7, 2016 14 hours ago, geraldnewfie said: typical american picking up for their gov who secretly hides everything! if you believe what they tell ya then your sir needs a ct scan on your head.... and you think this team will release info to the pubic without the gov having their hands in it first then your in denial...they will release it 24 hrs later like all rover images after they photoshop them, and a hoax hey? well there is still questions about the landing that aint answered and if they did, what did they find, why a few mins on a different channel that the pubic couldnt listen to, why did 3 of them look so despressed and scared when they arrived back? hiding something? if we went up there and came back we be excited but not them. so question is did they go up? or was it they are good actors saying they did? why so long to go back up? why after roswell we decided to go up then wait till now? anyways Get off your Mom's computer and back into the books, even for a kid you are woefully uneducated. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChrLzs Posted December 8, 2016 #28 Share Posted December 8, 2016 On 12/7/2016 at 4:09 PM, ChrLzs said: Can you point out any {Mars Rover images} that you think are photoshopped? Can you also explain why NASA, who would get a HUGE increase in funding at the first sign of off-planet life, would hide something exciting like that? And if they did want to hide it, surely they would simply not display those images, rather than do that and also allow others to see the raw data, thus ensuring they would be busted. Only to date they never have been shown to falsify the original data... On 12/7/2016 at 4:09 PM, ChrLzs said: Quote well there is still questions about the landing that aint answered ASK YOUR BEST ONE. Right now. And let's see how good your knowledge is, Gerald. If what you think is the 'best' evidence of hoaxery is shown as incorrect and/or ignorant, then the implication is pretty obvious. So, be brave and post the best evidence you've seen. No reply to this? I'm waiting, Gerald... You've been back to the forum since posting these claims - why are you suddenly shy? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Derek Willis Posted December 8, 2016 #29 Share Posted December 8, 2016 (edited) On 12/7/2016 at 6:09 AM, ChrLzs said: Can you point out any that you think are photoshopped? Can you also explain why NASA, who would get a HUGE increase in funding at the first sign of off-planet life, would hide something exciting like that? It seems the Curiosity "selfie" images were manipulated to hide the robotic arm holding the camera. But JPL/NASA happily admitted to that! Edit: Actually, the truth is that Curiosity isn't on Mars, and I was the person who took the photographs! Edited December 8, 2016 by Derek Willis 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Merc14 Posted December 8, 2016 Author #30 Share Posted December 8, 2016 1 hour ago, Derek Willis said: It seems the Curiosity "selfie" images were manipulated to hide the robotic arm holding the camera. But JPL/NASA happily admitted to that! Edit: Actually, the truth is that Curiosity isn't on Mars, and I was the person who took the photographs! Here is the proof 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Derek Willis Posted December 8, 2016 #31 Share Posted December 8, 2016 4 minutes ago, Merc14 said: Here is the proof Hey Merc, I've given you a like also! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now