Brexit: London gateway to Europe?

[Unusual Tournament]

4 hours ago, stevewinn said:

im afraid you will have to spell it out. Because you haven't answered the question. (no surprise) god loves a trier and god your trying.

Yet again, What does it say in the treaties about a country leaving the Euro?

Lets see if you've learnt the lessons of the past and finally understand what your talking about. I notice all your links are yet again opinionated media outlets. Any chance you can use official sources for a change?

 

Posting a link to your vague point about salvaging your mistake about euro membership and debt might help your argument more, you know. 

[Unusual Tournament]

You back again? You should really follow through on what you say... terrible self discipline. 

[Space Commander Travis]

8 minutes ago, Captain Risky said:

Posting a link to your vague point about salvaging your mistake about euro membership and debt might help your argument more, you know. 

he should post a link from the Independent, that's what he should do. They can always be relied on, and they're not biased in the slightest. 

[Unusual Tournament]

Just now, Manfred von Dreidecker said:

he should post a link from the Independent, that's what he should do. They can always be relied on, and they're not biased in the slightest. 

You should worry less about stevewinn and his fascination with the Daily Mail and more about answering a few of my questions... don't you think?

[Duke Wellington]

1 hour ago, Captain Risky said:

Decades to build the banking industry and at the behest of the people, moments to abolish. My understanding is that the current banking arrangements rely on British banking having direct access to Europe. If Britain is out of the EU then why would business use London as a financial clearing house for transaction? Taxes and regulation will make any use of London redundant. I see your point about banking infrastructure and educated people but Paris, Amsterdam and Frankfurt could just as easily take up the slack. Who say's that just one city needs to take over London's duties.    

I would argue that we want no free trade agreements.

All firms should compete on an equal playing field exposed to a full range of market forces. Not given a safety buffer to protect them from competitors outside the trading block. All that achieves in the long-term is reduced levels of innovation from our businesses and them not really being on the ball. We want a strong and vibrant economy where our organisations have their acts together not one when incompetence goes unpunished.

 If the EU was to place trade barriers on our banking sector then let it. All they do is damage their own banking sector in the long-run due to the above. If we have to compete with no special agreements in place to favour us then we have to be on the ball to do so. Consumers will get a better deal and as our banks adapt to compete under the new conditions our economy will benefit from it.

Our banking and financial services sector require expert knowledge to offer their products to customers. That expert knowledge is not easily replicated or transplanted. It London disappeared it would take Germany decades before its banking sector could expand to meet the demand.

[stevewinn]

12 hours ago, Captain Risky said:

Posting a link to your vague point about salvaging your mistake about euro membership and debt might help your argument more, you know. 

Yet again no answer to the question put to you.

All you are capable of is posting opinionated media articles and when questioned on it your left at a loss having not learnt the knowledge for yourself. One only has to look at the elementary mistakes in your none coherent replies to all members on here. 

On to your next post with the traditional large Bold font.