Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 2
UM-Bot

Large Hadron Collider discovers new particles

14 posts in this topic

 

Love it.  Thanks for sharing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I wonder if these particles are made of yet smaller, unknown particles. This could go into the ever smaller realm of particles with no end in sight, but at some point our instrumentality will probably break down, not allowing us to see beyond a certain limit. 

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Awesome

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Quarks to the left of me, quasars to the right, here I am, stuck in the middle with you.

2 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I read about this from several sources, but no one mentions any significance beyond the simple fact of their existence.  Does it prove or disprove some conjecture about the behavior of quarks?  Was their presence predicted?  Does it imply some hitherto unknown physics?  Is it, as I suspect, just news to tell us the Hadron people are busy.  

4 people like this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

42 minutes ago, Frank Merton said:

Does it prove or disprove some conjecture about the behavior of quarks?  Was their presence predicted?  Does it imply some hitherto unknown physics?  Is it, as I suspect, just news to tell us the Hadron people are busy.

Right On my man FRANK ! "Does it prove or disprove some conjecture about the behavior of quarks?  ...  Is it, as I suspect, just news to tell us the Hadron people are busy."  Mmmm maybe they'll elaborate in a few weeks, hopefully still not holding hard to string theory fun. Anyone read up on all the different particles? HOLY! think my head about burst!

Excellent re: below :::::

5 hours ago, Sundew said:

I wonder if these particles are made of yet smaller, unknown particles. This could go into the ever smaller realm of particles with no end in sight

Yeah when it first started out, I would assume everyone kind of had that thought in the back of their head, but probably didn't expect the can of worms they now have HA!

Edited by MWoo7
1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It seems to me, given the nature of the universe and our perception.

No matter how deeply we look either within, or without, we will perceive something.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Frank Merton said:

I read about this from several sources, but no one mentions any significance beyond the simple fact of their existence.  Does it prove or disprove some conjecture about the behavior of quarks?  Was their presence predicted?  Does it imply some hitherto unknown physics?  Is it, as I suspect, just news to tell us the Hadron people are busy.  

I'm also missing more elaboration on the finding. I would for example like to know if the find was expected according to known physics or not.

1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Regardless of the "importance"  it's still an amazing discovery.  Maybe it's just the SciFi freak in me, but the more CERN does the closer I feel we're getting to a boom! BIG or small.  Hopefully not a BANG!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

well... when the frequencies we use for radio broadcasting were discovered, we didn't know the ramifications and potential uses of them at the time.

Discovery is for discovery... the uses of those discoveries... I'm sure some clever capitalists will jump in and find a way to profit from it soon enough.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Good deal. Hoping for further findings from this awesome physics machine.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On March 20, 2017 at 9:45 PM, Twin said:

Quarks to the left of me, quasars to the right, here I am, stuck in the middle with you.

RIP Gerry Rafferty. 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

These particles seem to be higher-energy excitations of an already known particle, formed from one charm and two strange quarks.

In high-energy physics, different excitation levels of particles are often treated as new particles (for valid technical reasons).

I think (not an expert, but somewhat knowledgeable) that the importance of this find is that knowing the energy levels of these charmed/strange particles helps quantify the strong force interaction between charm quarks. This has bearing on possible grand unified theories.

So:

  • The sub-atomic particles just discovered are definitely composed of already known ``sub-sub-atomic'' particles.
  • These particles are expected to exist according to known physics, but the energy levels of these exotic particle states cannot be predicted very well with our current theory so we didn't have a clear idea ``where'' to find them.
  • There is probably not any unknown physics at work here. Charm/strange quark systems are relatively easy to produce in moderate-energy accelerators and have been well-studied for decades. Excited states are more difficult to product (need higher energy, obviously) but should not exhibit any novel behaviour.
1 person likes this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 2

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.