The Narcisse Posted July 24, 2017 #26 Share Posted July 24, 2017 Only when they confirm you're already deeply held assumptions. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gromdor Posted July 24, 2017 #27 Share Posted July 24, 2017 1 hour ago, preacherman76 said: It's not necessarily that they fabricated sources. It's that their sources are full of s***. If they could have, they would literally have us believe Trump had prostitutes pee on a bed once slept on by 0bama. These are the people you are believing. He was buds with Epstein and the Clintons (including Bill)......... With friends like that, that story isn't too much of a stretch. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+and-then Posted July 24, 2017 #28 Share Posted July 24, 2017 7 hours ago, Farmer77 said: Just because they say things you dont like doesn't mean they're wrong and when they are, as witnessed just recently, they retract the story and people lose their jobs. Which kinda goes back to the original article, dont trust stories that cite a single unnamed source. That retraction and firing was due to legal liability. I saw more than one reference to the sum being around 100 million that Scaramucci could have won for their actions. He was a fool not to burn them. That was the only reason they retracted. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now