Jump to content
Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -

When To Trust Unnamed Sources


Farmer77

Recommended Posts

 
1 hour ago, preacherman76 said:

It's not necessarily that they fabricated sources. It's that their sources are full of s***. 

If they could have, they would literally have us believe Trump had prostitutes pee on a bed once slept on by 0bama. 

These are the people you are believing. 

He was buds with Epstein and the Clintons (including Bill).........  With friends like that, that story isn't too much of a stretch.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Farmer77 said:

Just because they say things you dont like doesn't mean they're wrong and when they are, as witnessed just recently, they retract the story and people lose their jobs. Which kinda goes back to the original article, dont trust stories that cite a single unnamed source. 

That retraction and firing was due to legal liability.  I saw more than one reference to the sum being around 100 million that Scaramucci could have won for their actions.  He was a fool not to burn them.  That was the only reason they retracted.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.