AnchorSteam Posted August 3, 2017 #76 Share Posted August 3, 2017 (edited) 6 hours ago, F3SS said: ... That's the type of slime involved here. Don't put any amount of criminal activity or political corruption past them. They are the mossy sediment at the bottom of the swamp and there are none more corrupt and out of touch. Okay, I agree with what you are saying about the Leadership, the scum that floated to the top and now have a strangle-hold on the strings of power. That even applies to the fringe front-groups, like AntiFa, the Greens. B.A.M.N. and the Teacher's Unions. (okay, being a little sarcastic with that last one, but only a little...the leader of BAMN still teaches Middle School) But with the shoe firmly on the other foot at this point, I want to re-state something I said a while ago; the two parties need each other. Right and Left exist in balance, and upsetting that balance results in Tyranny and/or Chaos (see Venezuela). Many Democrats live in mortal fear of the very idea that thier Party is losing any Power at all. They have been told to think that if the Right wins anything at all, the next day they will have to learn the Horst Wessel song and start saluting the flag on a can of Coka Cola. And who told them that? The very same *******s that just dropped this filthy scandal on them like a dead snake over their shoulders. Soon, they will start seeing the full implications of what is happening here, and what next? I wouild hope that they take the fullest advantage of the Democratic system of Government and chase all the bums right out of D.C. and back into the multi-million dollar Florida condos and the Philippine girls they have stashed away for retirement. However, for some strange reason, they seem to think that using their rights to the fullest is some form of treason! After being told time and time again that Trump is a buffoon because he isn't one of the cloistered Aristocrats in power for life, they are afraid of looking like fools or nerds of they support an outisder of their own. Those Talking Heads on TV sure hold a lot of power... But, if you on the Right offer conciliation, do something that the Left is reluctant to do for you on the Right (at the moment), and keep treating main-stream Democrats like fellow Americans... then maybe something positive can come of this. Maybe they can get us another JFK for 2024, but only if they feel safe enough to do some major house-cleaning. Edited August 3, 2017 by AnchorSteam Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gromdor Posted August 3, 2017 #77 Share Posted August 3, 2017 So it's been a week or so. Has anything been said about what was on the hard drive? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bee Posted August 3, 2017 #78 Share Posted August 3, 2017 14 hours ago, F3SS said: I think some people misunderstand the type of slime we are dealing with here. These are people whose entire being revolves around political gain. This DNC, spearheaded by an autonomous pawn named Debbie, is completely void of any type of heartfelt conviction or ability to play it straight especially at the time of last years election. Their entire purpose, agenda and script was to promote Hillary Clinton rather than the Democratic Party and her contenders. They rigged their side of the election. When that was found out Debbie took the fall as I believe she was always supposed to. What happened next? Hillary hired her to work on her campaign. The integrity these people showed was something to behold. Then we have hubris. To this clique there was never going to be any other outcome than Hillary in the Oval Office. They ran her campaign with ignorance and corruption like no other. Bob Creamer was caught on project veritas admitting that the stated intent was [for Hillary] to win by any means necessary including deceit and violence where he then admitted to paying for all the violence we seen at Trump rallies. He was ordered to and said that while their was no direct contact that Hillary absolutely was aware who was causing the violence along with how and why. Her team just kept in the plausible deniability zone. Back to the hubris, this all happened because she was going to win and they would never be caught or ousted. Debbie was right there for the whole thing and she had a job in the White House. Once in they were going to destroy all evidence or have the power to avoid any trouble if caught and they were all dead wrong. They miscalculated and did business with this Awan guy who knows and did god knows what for this crime syndicate. That's the type of slime involved here. Don't put any amount of criminal activity or political corruption past them. They are the mossy sediment at the bottom of the swamp and there are none more corrupt and out of touch. well said - and it's chilling that those people (the slime) actually feel morally superior to others - and re the bolded above .... it's obvious that this overall strategy now applies to trying to remove Trump - anything goes for them and their supporters no matter how dishonest or deceitful - 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lilly Posted August 3, 2017 #79 Share Posted August 3, 2017 1 hour ago, bee said: well said - and it's chilling that those people (the slime) actually feel morally superior to others - and re the bolded above .... it's obvious that this overall strategy now applies to trying to remove Trump - anything goes for them and their supporters no matter how dishonest or deceitful - I see this as well. And, it's not just certain Democrats that are willing to use slimey tactics to get at Trump, it's the RINO Republicans (the never Trumpers) as well. These people (both Ds and Rs) don't give a proverbial 'rodent's rear' about America, our laws, our Constitution, our economy...and especially could care less about the average citizens. The reality that groups like Antifa and BAMN are even tolerated should make everyone extremely wary (and suspicious) of the agenda the far left is pushing upon our political system. Extremes are bad, everyone would go absolutely nuts if the far right extremists (like the KKK and the Neo-Nazis) were being supported by the media and academia! Time to call out all extremists (right and left) and return to the rule of law under our Constitution. 9 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paranormal Panther Posted August 3, 2017 #80 Share Posted August 3, 2017 13 hours ago, bee said: well said - and it's chilling that those people (the slime) actually feel morally superior to others - and re the bolded above .... it's obvious that this overall strategy now applies to trying to remove Trump - anything goes for them and their supporters no matter how dishonest or deceitful - You're right. There indeed is an orchestrated campaign to damage and/or destroy Trump's presidency. That much is obvious. It didn't take a prophet to predict it. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lilly Posted August 3, 2017 #81 Share Posted August 3, 2017 Mueller has taken it to a grand jury and surprise, the prosecutors are Democratic supporters. Yeah, they will bring down Trump one way or another. The mistake they make is that Trump's base will simply align behind Mike Pence. I don't think this is going to turn out like certain people think it will. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bee Posted August 4, 2017 #82 Share Posted August 4, 2017 although the MSM are getting all excited over the Grand Jury move I was alerted to it's probably not coming to anything when Sky News (an example of shameless Mind Control Media) - tempered it's dramatic announcement by adding the caveat that it didn't mean what it might appear to at first glance - and that the Trump Administration welcomed the move - it allows Mueller to subpoena documents and compel witnesses in hearings that are not made public - that will frustrate the salivating press for a start - I seriously doubt, myself, that ''''they'''' are going to be able to pin anything on Trump or his Campaign - and I think most people understand, the whole collusion nonsense is a Smoke and Mirrors exercise to poison people's minds - this could be the formal beginning of the end of the matter that has been ratcheted up by Trump's enemies for all it's worth - Trump has said in the past that he doesn't think it's a good move to tell your enemies or opponents what your plans are - and I hope that behind the scenes this Awan family and the Democrats debacle is shaping up into a real expose - the Mind Control Media won't want to touch it with a barge pole though - 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paranormal Panther Posted August 4, 2017 #83 Share Posted August 4, 2017 15 hours ago, bee said: although the MSM are getting all excited over the Grand Jury move I was alerted to it's probably not coming to anything when Sky News (an example of shameless Mind Control Media) - tempered it's dramatic announcement by adding the caveat that it didn't mean what it might appear to at first glance - and that the Trump Administration welcomed the move - it allows Mueller to subpoena documents and compel witnesses in hearings that are not made public - that will frustrate the salivating press for a start - I seriously doubt, myself, that ''''they'''' are going to be able to pin anything on Trump or his Campaign - and I think most people understand, the whole collusion nonsense is a Smoke and Mirrors exercise to poison people's minds - this could be the formal beginning of the end of the matter that has been ratcheted up by Trump's enemies for all it's worth - Trump has said in the past that he doesn't think it's a good move to tell your enemies or opponents what your plans are - and I hope that behind the scenes this Awan family and the Democrats debacle is shaping up into a real expose - the Mind Control Media won't want to touch it with a barge pole though - It's likely a huge fishing expedition in search of something that will hurt Trump and/or his staff. It could be that they won't stop until they find *something*. It's pretty much clear that they're not just trying to find proof of X, but they're trying to find any kind of scandal with which to tarnish Trump. They're likely casting a very wide net. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aztek Posted August 7, 2017 #84 Share Posted August 7, 2017 DOJ Releases 400-Plus Pages of Lynch-Clinton Meeting Emails – After Comey’s FBI Said No Records Existed (CNSNews.com) – The Department of Justice on Friday released 413 pages of emails related to a controversial private meeting between former President Bill Clinton and then-Attorney General Loretta Lynch during the FBI’s investigation into then-presidential-candidate Hillary Clinton’s Benghazi emails. The FBI said earlier such records did not exist. http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/zenny-phuong/doj-releases-400-plus-pages-lynch-clinton-meeting-emails-after-comeys-fbi 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Why not Posted August 7, 2017 #85 Share Posted August 7, 2017 It's really a shame the FBI has become the latest agency to become politicized in the long list of government agencies to become politicized in recent years. They were the one agency I thought would not be entrapped. So long America. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AnchorSteam Posted August 7, 2017 #86 Share Posted August 7, 2017 9 hours ago, aztek said: DOJ Releases 400-Plus Pages of Lynch-Clinton Meeting Emails – After Comey’s FBI Said No Records Existed (CNSNews.com) – The Department of Justice on Friday released 413 pages of emails related to a controversial private meeting between former President Bill Clinton and then-Attorney General Loretta Lynch during the FBI’s investigation into then-presidential-candidate Hillary Clinton’s Benghazi emails. The FBI said earlier such records did not exist. http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/zenny-phuong/doj-releases-400-plus-pages-lynch-clinton-meeting-emails-after-comeys-fbi Well, nothing like being a day late and a dollar short. Am I the only one that feels like banging his head on a wall right now? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aztek Posted August 8, 2017 #87 Share Posted August 8, 2017 Obama Attorney General Used Fake Identity To Hide Clinton Investigation Former President Obama’s attorney general, Loretta Lynch, used a fake name to cover up an investigation into Hillary Clinton’s email server, indicates an admission from Lynch’s attorney. Using an email account under a fake name, Lynch (a.k.a. “Elizabeth Carlisle”) coordinated with DOJ officials to respond to queries about the secretive meeting with the former president. Lynch’s attorney, Robert Raben, confirmed her use of an alias on Monday and said she used an email account under a fake identity to prevent “inundation of mailboxes.” Using fake names was a common tactic among Obama administration officials to evade accountability. AG Eric Holder, Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius, and EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson all did so when serving in public offices during Obama’s tenure. Lois Lerner, an IRS official who has been suspected of using the tax-collecting agency to target conservative nonprofit organizations, is also thought tohave used an email address registered to a pseudonym to conduct official business. https://thefederalist.com/2017/08/07/obamas-attorney-general-used-fake-identity-hide-clinton-investigation-e-mails/ 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dark_Grey Posted August 8, 2017 #88 Share Posted August 8, 2017 11 minutes ago, aztek said: Lynch’s attorney, Robert Raben, confirmed her use of an alias on Monday and said she used an email account under a fake identity to prevent “inundation of mailboxes.” Quote Using fake names was a common tactic among Obama administration officials to evade accountability. Welp. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vorg Posted August 8, 2017 #89 Share Posted August 8, 2017 17 minutes ago, aztek said: Obama Attorney General Used Fake Identity To Hide Clinton Investigation Former President Obama’s attorney general, Loretta Lynch, used a fake name to cover up an investigation into Hillary Clinton’s email server, indicates an admission from Lynch’s attorney. Using an email account under a fake name, Lynch (a.k.a. “Elizabeth Carlisle”) coordinated with DOJ officials to respond to queries about the secretive meeting with the former president. Lynch’s attorney, Robert Raben, confirmed her use of an alias on Monday and said she used an email account under a fake identity to prevent “inundation of mailboxes.” Using fake names was a common tactic among Obama administration officials to evade accountability. AG Eric Holder, Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius, and EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson all did so when serving in public offices during Obama’s tenure. Lois Lerner, an IRS official who has been suspected of using the tax-collecting agency to target conservative nonprofit organizations, is also thought tohave used an email address registered to a pseudonym to conduct official business. https://thefederalist.com/2017/08/07/obamas-attorney-general-used-fake-identity-hide-clinton-investigation-e-mails/ So In other words she didn't want her mail box filled with emails from every body in the world. Regardless, she would still need to go through her emails to verify if true needs existed. So that sounds like total crap to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AnchorSteam Posted August 12, 2017 #90 Share Posted August 12, 2017 Russia-gate; It's a Leak, not a Hack A New Report Raises Big Questions About Last Year’s DNC HackFormer NSA experts say it wasn’t a hack at all, but a leak—an inside job by someone with access to the DNC’s system EXCERPTS: Quote ...The president’s ability to conduct foreign policy, notably but not only with regard to Russia, is now crippled. Forced into a corner and having no choice, Trump just signed legislation imposing severe new sanctions on Russia and European companies working with it on pipeline projects vital to Russia’s energy sector. Striking this close to the core of another nation’s economy is customarily considered an act of war, we must not forget. In retaliation, Moscow has announced that the United States must cut its embassy staff by roughly two-thirds. All sides agree that relations between the United States and Russia are now as fragile as they were during some of the Cold War’s worst moments. To suggest that military conflict between two nuclear powers inches ever closer can no longer be dismissed as hyperbole. ...All this was set in motion when the DNC’s mail server was first violated in the spring of 2016 and by subsequent assertions that Russians were behind that “hack” and another such operation, also described as a Russian hack, on July 5. These are the foundation stones of the edifice just outlined. The evolution of public discourse in the year since is worthy of scholarly study: Possibilities became allegations, and these became probabilities. Then the probabilities turned into certainties, and these evolved into what are now taken to be established truths. By my reckoning, it required a few days to a few weeks to advance from each of these stages to the next. This was accomplished via the indefensibly corrupt manipulations of language repeated incessantly in our leading media. Lost in a year that often appeared to veer into our peculiarly American kind of hysteria is the absence of any credible evidence of what happened last year and who was responsible for it. It is tiresome to note, but none has been made available. Instead, we are urged to accept the word of institutions and senior officials with long records of deception. There was no hack of the Democratic National Committee’s system on July 5 last year—not by the Russians, not by anyone else. Hard science now demonstrates it was a leak—a download executed locally with a memory key or a similarly portable data-storage device. In short, it was an inside job by someone with access to the DNC’s system. This casts serious doubt on the initial “hack,” as alleged, that led to the very consequential publication of a large store of documents on WikiLeaks last summer. The customary VIPS format is an open letter, typically addressed to the president. The group has written three such letters on the DNC incident, all of which were first published by Robert Parry at www.consortiumnews.com. Here is the latest, dated July 24; it blueprints the forensic work this article explores in detail. They have all argued that the hack theory is wrong and that a locally executed leak is the far more likely explanation. In a letter to Barack Obama dated January 17, three days before he left office, the group explained that the NSA’s known programs are fully capable of capturing all electronic transfers of data. “We strongly suggest that you ask NSA for any evidence it may have indicating that the results of Russian hacking were given to WikiLeaks,” the letter said. “If NSA cannot produce such evidence—and quickly—this would probably mean it does not have any.” .... Forensicator’s first decisive findings, made public in the paper dated July 9, concerned the volume of the supposedly hacked material and what is called the transfer rate—the time a remote hack would require. The metadata established several facts in this regard with granular precision: On the evening of July 5, 2016, 1,976 megabytes of data were downloaded from the DNC’s server. The operation took 87 seconds. This yields a transfer rate of 22.7 megabytes per second. ...“A speed of 22.7 megabytes is simply unobtainable, especially if we are talking about a transoceanic data transfer,” Folden said. “Based on the data we now have, what we’ve been calling a hack is impossible.” Last week Forensicator reported on a speed test he conducted more recently. It tightens the case considerably. “Transfer rates of 23 MB/s (Mega Bytes per second) are not just highly unlikely, but effectively impossible to accomplish when communicating over the Internet at any significant distance,” he wrote. “Further, local copy speeds are measured, demonstrating that 23 MB/s is a typical transfer rate when using a USB–2 flash device (thumb drive).” ...Time stamps in the metadata provide further evidence of what happened on July 5. The stamps recording the download indicate that it occurred in the Eastern Daylight Time Zone at approximately 6:45 pm. This confirms that the person entering the DNC system was working somewhere on the East Coast of the United States. In theory the operation could have been conducted from Bangor or Miami or anywhere in between—but not Russia, Romania, or anywhere else outside the EDT zone. Combined with Forensicator’s findings on the transfer rate, the time stamps constitute more evidence that the download was conducted locally, since delivery overheads—conversion of data into packets, addressing, sequencing times, error checks, and the like—degrade all data transfers conducted via the Internet, more or less according to the distance involved. ... Well there you have it. https://www.thenation.com/article/a-...ears-dnc-hack/Note this comes from "The Nation", which is usually considered to be a Left leaning publication and one that could be expected to be "anti-Trump". Here we have a case of objective integrity in this issue.Note in the EXCERPTS above(and the full article content) the imposible internet data tranfer rates that implicate download to a thumb drive (or similar); the date/time stamps; and the detectable copy-paste to a "forged" document format made to look like it's "the Russians". Thoughts? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
F3SS Posted August 12, 2017 #91 Share Posted August 12, 2017 Thoughts? Seth Rich. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Farmer77 Posted August 12, 2017 #92 Share Posted August 12, 2017 Just now, F3SS said: Thoughts? Seth Rich. Seth Rich? Lawsuit: Fox News concocted Seth Rich story with oversight from White House Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
F3SS Posted August 12, 2017 #93 Share Posted August 12, 2017 3 minutes ago, Farmer77 said: Seth Rich? Lawsuit: Fox News concocted Seth Rich story with oversight from White House I wouldn't need that story to think it was maybe Seth rich. His death was not a botched robbery and that DNC was an organized crime syndicate headed by Hillary Gambino and Debbie Two-Tales Shultz. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gromdor Posted August 12, 2017 #94 Share Posted August 12, 2017 So it's been a few weeks now. What was on the hard drive? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vorg Posted August 12, 2017 #95 Share Posted August 12, 2017 (edited) 13 hours ago, AnchorSteam said: Russia-gate; It's a Leak, not a Hack A New Report Raises Big Questions About Last Year’s DNC HackFormer NSA experts say it wasn’t a hack at all, but a leak—an inside job by someone with access to the DNC’s system EXCERPTS: Well there you have it. https://www.thenation.com/article/a-...ears-dnc-hack/Note this comes from "The Nation", which is usually considered to be a Left leaning publication and one that could be expected to be "anti-Trump". Here we have a case of objective integrity in this issue.Note in the EXCERPTS above(and the full article content) the imposible internet data tranfer rates that implicate download to a thumb drive (or similar); the date/time stamps; and the detectable copy-paste to a "forged" document format made to look like it's "the Russians". Thoughts? http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/08/wow-breaking-video-julian-assange-suggests-seth-rich-wikileaks-dnc-source-shot-dead-dc/ Julian Assange suggested over a year ago that the murdered DNC staffer Seth Rich was the source of the leaks. And to deflect attention away from that, the DNC and Hillary started screaming "RUSSIA!". Yet the DNC would not allow the FBI or any intelligence agencies to examine the DNC drives to look for evidence that Russia had "hacked" the drives to steal the data. It all makes sense and is coming together. What has the world come to when the criminally complicit has become the norm in our government? Not to mention Podesta himself even was privy to make an example out of leakers.. http://yournewswire.com/wikileaks-podesta-seth-rich/ Exactly who were these leakers, and how did the DNC make an example out of them? Can Podesta point to anyone alive? And leaked to whom? Edited August 12, 2017 by South Alabam 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AnchorSteam Posted August 12, 2017 #96 Share Posted August 12, 2017 1 hour ago, South Alabam said: Exactly who were these leakers, and how did the DNC make an example out of them? Can Podesta point to anyone alive? And leaked to whom? See the thread on the Awan Brothers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ian hacktorp Posted August 18, 2017 #97 Share Posted August 18, 2017 (edited) Debbie Wasserman Schultz’ Ex-IT Aide Indicted on 4 Counts Imran Awan was just indicted on 4 counts by Grand Jury. Heavy perspiration may take some of the bounce out of those curls... Edited August 18, 2017 by hacktorp 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AnchorSteam Posted August 18, 2017 #98 Share Posted August 18, 2017 (edited) Quote The federal case against Imran Awan, a former IT aide for Democratic Florida Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz, expanded Thursday with an indictment on four counts including conspiracy and making false statements. He originally was charged with a single bank fraud count; his wife Hina Alvi also was indicted Thursday. http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/08/18/case-against-wasserman-schultz-ex-it-aide-expands-with-4-count-indictment.html Add this to the Bank Fraud and these guys are in serious trouble. I wonder if Schultz is still trying to get that laptop back Edited August 18, 2017 by AnchorSteam Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skliss Posted August 19, 2017 #99 Share Posted August 19, 2017 If I was computer savy I would merge the above pic with one of Sgt "I know nuthink!" Schultz from Hogan's Heroes...lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now