Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 1
Talon

Americas: 9/11 art project sparks NY anger

9 posts in this topic

9/11 art project sparks NY anger

A US artist in a harness has thrown himself off a five-storey building more than 30 times to create photographs recalling the 11 September attacks.

Kerry Skarbakka was photographed as he repeatedly fell from the roof of the Museum of Contemporary Art in Chicago.

He had the idea after seeing Twin Towers workers fall to their deaths. "I was so distraught, I needed some way to find an artistic response," he said.

New York mayor Michael Bloomberg called the project "nauseatingly offensive".

'Sick individual'

Skarbakka, 34, previously exhibited images of him falling off balconies, from trees and off stepladders.

"Mentally, physically and emotionally, from day to day, we fall. Even walking is falling. You take a step, fall and catch yourself," he said.

More than 2,700 people died when hijacked planes collided with New York's World Trade Center on 11 September 2001.

The mother of a man killed in the attacks was reportedly unimpressed by Skarbakka's latest photo project.

"What kind of a sick individual is he? Tell him to go jump off the Empire State Building and see how it feels," Paul Salvio's mother Rosemarie Giallombardo told the New York Daily News.

"He's an artist? Go paint a bowl of fruit or something."

Story from BBC NEWS:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/1/hi/ente...rts/4104558.stm

.... yeah that is sick huh.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You may be offended, but thats how art is; Artists seek out the edges of moral/social barriers and explore them. All art is controversial when its first shown... look at nude figures? The Venus DeMilo is still censored whenever its shown on TV, even though its nudity in the sake of art, not in a lewd or underhanded manner.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You may be offended, but thats how art is; Artists seek out the edges of moral/social barriers and explore them. All art is controversial when its first shown... look at nude figures? The Venus DeMilo is still censored whenever its shown on TV, even though its nudity in the sake of art, not in a lewd or underhanded manner.

682748[/snapback]

That is such an interesting reply... "Artists seek out the edges of moral/social barriers and explore them."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You may be offended, but thats how art is; Artists seek out the edges of moral/social barriers and explore them. All art is controversial when its first shown... look at nude figures? The Venus DeMilo is still censored whenever its shown on TV, even though its nudity in the sake of art, not in a lewd or underhanded manner.

But you do know,that torture,murder etc are beyond the social border?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

^ Not always... I have seen a lot of killer's art work but this guy just went to far. Disgusting he would use that suicide to make money. no.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not always... I have seen a lot of killer's art work but this guy just went to far. Disgusting he would use that suicide to make money.

No,not always.What I was trying to show,is that murderers do the very same thing.Does that mean they are artists?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

^ In the sick world of art... yes. There is some art that have been forwarded to me in e-mail that I can't even describe for this forum. The limits of art are no longer limited to nude bodies resting on a grape vine, as in the old ages. The vast art world of today has next to everything for "art".

Edit: Stupid typo demons! devil.gif

Edited by __Kratos__

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, technically, it is art, in the sense that it is a medium being used to draw forth an emotional response from the viewer, and the man is an artist in the sense that this is the method which defines his life. I can't really say it's sick, since it is not my place to judge anothers tastes and choices. I will say it is in bad taste, and consideration should have been taken over the reception, but then, every artist faces the dangers of the public.

Ultimately, I will walk away from this art because I do not like what it represents, but I do recognize that it is art in its own right, albeit not necessarily good art.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I dont find anything wrong with ti. He said he was distraught over seeing the 9/11 pictures, so he wanted an artistic way of expressing how he felt. Some of his pictures are really cool all the same.

Linky Linky

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 1

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.