Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
AlienSama

Champ is real but nessie isnt

15 posts in this topic

according to a para-normal.com article, scientists received sonar from champ in some lake. i think it was china. but in a new update, in para-normal.com, they said they tried to find some sonar of nessie but found nothing. thus, concluding nessie is fake, and champ being real. so is champ really a plesiosaur or a freak of nature?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Both of these subjects were also covered in the news on this site,

Champ Sonar Finds

Loch Ness Monster Finds

There is no evidence to say that Champ is a Plesiosaur, the sonar findings were indicative of a whale or dolphin like creature.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i just find these stories hard to believe...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

me too. thumbsup.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't really see why they bother. If they're right that Champ does exist, what are they going to do about it? And if it doesn't, people are still going to believe what they want.

I find it kind of hard to believe that it does exist though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

the only way is get some whaler boat, capture it and send it to sea world, then air it on news. thats the only way we would believe in such a creature.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

sea world? that's a long way away to put an extinct- pleaseosaur in a wooden box and sail away.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why would you want to send it to sea world? If Champ is found to really exist, it wouldn't have to be moved to a zoo for folks to believe its there. Some already do.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

good point snuffles.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

snuffles? huh.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
grin2.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

HEY ALIENSAMA....ARE YOU FROM WWW.CHAMPISREALNESSIEISFAKE.COM

FICTIONAL WEB ADDY ..I THINK laugh.gif

ACORRDING TO THE DISCOVERY CHANNEL PROGRAMS///THEY HAVE FOUND THINGS ON SONAR THAT THEY CANNOT EXPLAIN IN LOCH NESS.....SO I THINK THAT MAKES A BIT OF A CONFLICT FROM THE CHINESE REPORT....AGAIN..WE ARE LEFT WITH THE WHO FOUND AND DIDN'T FIND ........SOMETHING...AND WHERE................

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"Champ, the famed "monster" of Lake Champlain" mighigan/new york

not china smart 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Under my opinoin I find cahmp to be more beleivable but nessie also has "it's" pros as well as cons disgusted.gif Its who you ask. But champ has way more evidence then a few peoples story.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Dr. Roy P. Mackal. author and renowned Loch Ness investigator, always claimed that "Champ" was probably a relic species of the presumed extinct cetacean known as the basilosaurus. Unlike "Nessie", which he felt was another species all together, Mackal was convinced that the animal reported in lake champlain was a descendent of this snake-like whale.

Certainly not irrefutable proof, but it is at least intriguing... and these sounds seem like the best "evidence" to come down the Lake-Monster pike in some time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.