Jump to content
Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -

Collapse of the WTC Towers - Official Story..


Guest Lottie

Recommended Posts

Thank-you to both our debaters, you both did a fantastic job!

I shall now hand this debate over to the debate judges. :tu:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 
  • Replies 31
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Sunofone

    9

  • aquatus1

    8

  • AztecInca

    5

  • TooFarGone

    2

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Debater 1: aquatus1

Relevancy: 9

Countering: 8

Style: 10

Persuasiveness: 10

Total: 37

Debater 2: Sunofone

Relevancy: 8

Countering: 5

Style: 5

Persuasiveness: 6

Total: 24

EDIT: Forgot to comment :P

Great job to both. Sunofone, for future debates please try to capitalize, and use spell check. These are just simple things, and make a world of difference in the score you receive

Edited by TooFarGone
Link to comment
Share on other sites

congrats to A1-- i guess that flowery mental imagery thing worked out for you-- i guess "the truth" is irrelavent

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Debater 1: aquatus1

Relevancy: 9

Countering: 10

Style: 9

Persuasiveness: 10

Total: 38

Debater 2: Sunofone

Relevancy: 9

Countering: 10

Style: 7

Persuasiveness: 8

Total: 34

Great debate the both of you. Lots of information from both sides and a wealth of personal knowledge thrown in to your posts. I hope to see both of you sometime in the future for other debates. :tu:

If you have any questions or concerns, feel free to PM AztecInca or tiddlyjen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Great debate, both stayed pretty relevant throughout however I felt the gold/feathers argument a little unnecessary, no doubt it was an accurate analogy of conspiracy theory tactics but it didn't really add much to the conclusion.

Apart from that small detail I thought aquatus1 was the stronger debater, I cannot find fault with neither countering ability nor persuasiveness.

Style was very strong for both sides, good use of illustrations and technical knowledge although I must reiterate the point about the spell checker, it certainly takes away some credibility when claiming to be knowledgable about a subject when key words are spelled incorrectly.

Debater 1: aquatus1

Relevancy: 8

Countering: 10

Style: 9

Persuasiveness: 10

Total: 37

Debater 2: Sunofone

Relevancy: 9

Countering: 5

Style: 7

Persuasiveness: 6

Total: 27

Link to comment
Share on other sites

aquatus1 wins this debate with a final score of 37.3.

Sunofone finishes this debate with a final score of 28.3.

Well done to both our debaters, you both did an excellent job. :tu:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.