AztecInca Posted June 3, 2006 #26 Share Posted June 3, 2006 Thank-you to both our debaters, you both did a fantastic job! I shall now hand this debate over to the debate judges. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TooFarGone Posted June 3, 2006 #27 Share Posted June 3, 2006 (edited) Debater 1: aquatus1 Relevancy: 9 Countering: 8 Style: 10 Persuasiveness: 10 Total: 37 Debater 2: Sunofone Relevancy: 8 Countering: 5 Style: 5 Persuasiveness: 6 Total: 24 EDIT: Forgot to comment Great job to both. Sunofone, for future debates please try to capitalize, and use spell check. These are just simple things, and make a world of difference in the score you receive Edited June 3, 2006 by TooFarGone Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sunofone Posted June 3, 2006 #28 Share Posted June 3, 2006 congrats to A1-- i guess that flowery mental imagery thing worked out for you-- i guess "the truth" is irrelavent Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TooFarGone Posted June 3, 2006 #29 Share Posted June 3, 2006 (edited) The judging isnt over...... Edited June 3, 2006 by TooFarGone Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
__Kratos__ Posted June 3, 2006 #30 Share Posted June 3, 2006 Debater 1: aquatus1 Relevancy: 9 Countering: 10 Style: 9 Persuasiveness: 10 Total: 38 Debater 2: Sunofone Relevancy: 9 Countering: 10 Style: 7 Persuasiveness: 8 Total: 34 Great debate the both of you. Lots of information from both sides and a wealth of personal knowledge thrown in to your posts. I hope to see both of you sometime in the future for other debates. If you have any questions or concerns, feel free to PM AztecInca or tiddlyjen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thebarman Posted June 5, 2006 #31 Share Posted June 5, 2006 Great debate, both stayed pretty relevant throughout however I felt the gold/feathers argument a little unnecessary, no doubt it was an accurate analogy of conspiracy theory tactics but it didn't really add much to the conclusion. Apart from that small detail I thought aquatus1 was the stronger debater, I cannot find fault with neither countering ability nor persuasiveness. Style was very strong for both sides, good use of illustrations and technical knowledge although I must reiterate the point about the spell checker, it certainly takes away some credibility when claiming to be knowledgable about a subject when key words are spelled incorrectly. Debater 1: aquatus1 Relevancy: 8 Countering: 10 Style: 9 Persuasiveness: 10 Total: 37 Debater 2: Sunofone Relevancy: 9 Countering: 5 Style: 7 Persuasiveness: 6 Total: 27 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AztecInca Posted June 6, 2006 #32 Share Posted June 6, 2006 aquatus1 wins this debate with a final score of 37.3. Sunofone finishes this debate with a final score of 28.3. Well done to both our debaters, you both did an excellent job. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts