Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
__Kratos__

Can Bush Come Back?

10 posts in this topic

It may have been serendipitous that soon after the Associated Press released a poll indicating President Bush's approval rating had dropped to 33% and 45% of self-described conservatives now disapprove of Bush’s performance, the news leaked that Bush intended to nominate Gen. Michael Hayden to be director of the Central Intelligence Agency.

Hayden, the former director of the National Security Agency, is best known for his forceful defense of the NSA program ordered by President Bush that -- without first seeking warrants -- intercepts communications in and out of the U.S. by people with suspected links to al Qaeda.

Bush did not name the highly qualified Hayden to badger liberals into a renewed debate over this program. But renewing that debate is a happy political byproduct of a meritorious nomination.

There are four reasons that defending the NSA program turned out to be good politics as well as good policy: 1) The program addresses a serious issue. 2) It comports with commonsense. 3) Liberals, nonetheless, feel compelled to oppose it. 4) It demonstrates decisive presidential leadership.

The President can begin a political comeback -- and help his party retain control of Congress -- if he takes other actions that share these characteristics. Here are three suggestions:

  1. Deploy troops to secure the U.S.-Mexico border. Bush says he wants to secure the border, which is the aim of the tough immigration bill approved by the House. But at the same time he also wants a guest worker plan like the one being considered in the Senate, which many House conservatives correctly call an amnesty. Were Bush to win an amnesty, there would be a backlash in November against Republicans who supported it. But he could begin securing the border immediately, using the same authority he used to order the NSA intercepts: the president’s constitutional power to defend the country. The House has already approved an amendment sponsored by Rep. Virgil Goode (R.-Va.) authorizing the Defense Department to deploy troops on the border. The Senate has not done so. Bush should just do it. Then he can challenge complaining liberals to explain where U.S. troops ought to be deployed if not along the U.S. border.

  2. Offer “supplemental spending cuts” and enforce them with a veto. Bush asked Congress this year for a $92.2 billion “emergency” supplemental spending bill to help pay for the Iraq War and Hurricane Katrina relief. Rep. Jeb Hensarling (R.-Tex.), a leader of the conservative House Republican Study Committee, tried to offer an amendment to offset every penny of that new spending with spending cuts. The House leadership thwarted him and secured passage of a $91.9 billion bill with no offsetting cuts. The Senate upped that to $109 billion. Bush has threatened to veto the final bill if it includes more than his $92.2-billion request plus $2.3 billion for bird-flu preparedness. He should go further, sending Congress a $94.5 billion “emergency supplemental spending cuts bill” to offset his “emergency” spending. It should list specific items Bush wants to cut from appropriations proposed in his own $2.7 trillion fiscal 2007 budget. He should then veto any appropriation that fails to include these cuts. If Democrats want to vote to override the President’s vetoes in the weeks before the election, Republicans should let them try.

  3. Lift the moratorium on offshore drilling and enforce it with a veto. Many Americans now pay more than $3.00 per gallon for gasoline even though the U.S. sits atop massive pools of untapped oil. According to the Energy Information Administration, the U.S. imported 3.67 billion barrels of oil in 2005. But a report delivered to Congress in February by the Interior Department’s Minerals Management Service estimates there are 85.88 billion barrels of undiscovered oil off U.S. shores on the Outer Continental Shelf. At 2005 consumption levels, that oil could replace all our imported crude for about 23 years. Two things block broad development of these oil resources: A moratorium originally ordered by President George H.W. Bush (later extended by President Clinton), and language enforcing a moratorium placed in each year’s Interior appropriation. President Bush should reverse his father’s order and veto any Interior bill that enforces a moratorium. Then he should order Interior to start selling offshore oil drilling leases. Democrats can explain to voters why they want to turn off this supply and keep gas prices high.

As long as the situation remains uncertain in Iraq, the war there will be drag on Bush’s approval ratings. But if Bush takes bold actions like these to secure our border, cut runaway spending, and open our domestic oil supplies, he could start rebuilding his conservative base and reclaim support where he has lost it.

Source

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Some good ideas put out there. :tu:

Let's not make this a Bush bashing thread.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

He could declare martial law, that'd certainly help keep him in the white house.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

I have one and only one step for his "Excellency", resign and leave the country ! Not that Cheney would be any better.... I doubt anything Bush can do now will help approval ratings, much less help the stance of the Iran conflict, much less in Iraq. He put himself in the crapper, and he won't be able to claw his way out. I doubt drilling in and around in the US will help any. We still have the highest oil consumption in the world. I doubt opening domestic drilling would lower the gas prices. More money for Iraq and Katrina is pointless. Take more from Social Security to pay for the fake war? or for Hurricane victims that didn't listen to the "get out of New Orleans area" cries? I doubt spending cuts will help the economy much less where the government keeps getting the money from. We still have a trillion dollar defecit.

Troops on the mexican border? are you kidding.......The troops are all over seas. We have no one left to send to the border. If they had a system like what we have with Canada and the border crossing with them, it wouldn't be a problem. Make the immigrants pay for work visas, make them go to crossing stations, build higher fences and heck, even electric fencing. Force them to go to crossing stations. Make them pay for work visas, or passports, or whatever. Putting troops there is just going to end up in bloodshed. The easier way is to build "The Great Wall of America". A giant cement fence ! 12 feet high. If the immigrants want to work here, they should just do it the legal way, earn their passport and citizenship if they want it so bad instead of jumping borders and going to jail.

They charge you when you cross to Canada, you need a border pass and even then, if its for work, its a temp pass, and they follow up with you.

Edited by Dennison

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yup, he needs to pull the troops out of Iraq, admit he screwed up and lied, apologize to all of the families of those who were killed in the war and then resign. He won't, and he will never veto a bill, he hasn't since he's been in office.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yup, he needs to pull the troops out of Iraq, admit he screwed up and lied, apologize to all of the families of those who were killed in the war and then resign. He won't, and he will never veto a bill, he hasn't since he's been in office.

kept up with news lately? Ther were WMD's! One of Saddam's Generals admits it!

+ not that many in Iraq were killed, the life expectancy for troops in Iraq has been very good.

only 2,000 in 3 years!

on D-Day there were 10,000 casualties!

for those complaining about the losses of troops in Iraq, they are very little compared to most wars past.

:rolleyes:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

your completely wrong though so it doesnt actually matter what you say, its wrong.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

your completely wrong though so it doesnt actually matter what you say, its wrong.

explain how I am wrong and you are Mr. Right

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I heard that George Bush Senior could run for Pres. again.

oh Great!!!!!!!! :S

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"explain how I am wrong and you are Mr. Right"

http://icasualties.org/oif/default.aspx

Well Kaknelson Bush has just mentiond quite recently on what a great president that moron Jeb would make. I mean come on, are they inter breeding or something to produce such a defective gene pool?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well Bush has done some good. He's ruined the America economy which has made the dollar weak. Since i'm not American it's doesn't worry me and it means that the AUD dollar is strong against the US. So that means that trade is cheap for me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.