Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 1
crystal sage

planets' atmospheres are changing

8 posts in this topic

This is the Russian perspective on earth changes Hard facts that are going unreported in America The atmospheres of the planets are changing Dr. Dmitriev's work shows that the planets themselves are changing. They are undergoing changes in their atmospheres For example the Martian atmosphere is getting sizably thicker than it was before. The Mars observer probe in 1997 lost one of its mirrors, which caused it to crash, because the atmosphere was about twice as dense as they calculated, and basically the wind on that little mirror was so high that it blew it right off the device.

Earth's moon is growing an atmosphere Also, the moon is growing an atmosphere that's made up of a compound Dmitriev refers to as ''Natrium.'' Dmitriev says that, around the moon, there is this 6,000-kilometer-deep layer of Natrium that wasn't there before.

And we're having this kind of change in Earth's atmosphere in the upper levels, where HO gas is forming that wasn't there before; it simply did not exist in the quantity that it does now. It's not related to global warming and it's not related to CFCs or fluorocarbon emissions or any of that stuff. It's just showing up.

Magnetic fields and brightness of the planets are changing. The planets are experiencing sizable changes in their overall brightness. Venus, for example, is showing us marked increases in its overall brightness.

Jupiter has gotten to have such a high energetic charge that there is actually a visible tube of ionizing radiation that's formed between its moon, Io.

You can actually see the luminous energy tube in photographs that have been taken more recently.

And the planets are having a change in their fields. The magnetic fields are becoming stronger.

Jupiter's magnetic field has more than doubled. Uranus's magnetic field is changing. Neptune's magnetic field is increasing. These planets are becoming brighter. Their magnetic field strength is getting higher.

Their atmospheric qualities are changing.

Uranus and Neptune appear to have had recent pole shifts. When the Voyager 2 space probe flew past Uranus and Neptune, the apparent north and south magnetic poles were sizably offset from where the rotational pole was. In one case, it was 50 degrees off, and in the other case the difference was around 40 degrees, both of which are pretty big changes.

http://www.2012.com.au/Planets_changing.html

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What a pile of pseudo-science clap-trap.

"Natrium" is not some new substance, it is the latin name for sodium, hence the reason that sodium has the symbol Na in the periodic table.

The Mars Observer spacecraft was actually lost in 1993, not 1997. The reasons for it's loss are not know, but a ruptured fuel line leading to an explosion was suspected.

In 1999 (not 1997) The Mars Climate Orbiter was lost as a result of hitting the Martian atmosphere. The reason for this was quite simply a NASA error in sending instructions in metric that should have been Imperial, hence the spacecraft hit the atmosphere rather than missed it.

HO is a charged ion and a natural breakdown product of water (in fact in liquid water there is a constant equilibrium reaction going on with H2O breaking down into H+ and OH- ions. These are unstable and quickly recombine to reform H2O.

The piece about the pole shift on Uranus and Neptune shifting is a huge piece of speculation. As no one knew where the magnetic poles of these planets where before Voyager 2 arrived how can the Voyager data possibly be evidence that they had recently shifted?

Where is the evidence that the planets are getting brighter? As they shine by reflected light from the sun this would seem unlikely unless the sun was getting considerably brighter and I think we might notice that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting to note the year 2012 in the link.

Lets get the Mayan arguement started again :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting to note the year 2012 in the link.

Lets get the Mayan arguement started again :)

Not in this forum :no:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

RUSSIAN SCIENTIST SAYS THE SOLAR SYSTEM IS MOVING INTO A NEW ENERGY "ZONE" THAT IS TRANSFORMING THE MAGNETIC FIELDS OF THE PLANETS.

Dear Friends,

The scientific report below is so strange that I was not prepared to believe it or send it out to you until I contacted my old friend, peace poet, writer and translator, Igor Mikhailusenko in Moscow to find out if the scientist named below is a respected individual or just some kind of a kook. I can't really investigate the science but the least I can do is ascertain the reliability of the scientist.

Igor reports that the man is well-known and respected among Russian scientists and therefore I pass on the very interesting report below. We have always looked on the sun as very permanent and unchanging. But in fact we have recently been reading American scientists' reports of much larger magnetic storms on the sun than ever before. Sunspots have become larger or more numerous or the like, but no explanation has been offered. Now we may have it. I've not followed solar activity much but left it to others, not understanding that it could affect our real world situations.

Now it seems that what may really be happening is larger than just sun spot changes. It may actually be as Dr. Dmitriev seems to suggest that the entire solar system is moving into a new area of the heavens where things are indeed different.

We've always known that just as our planet revolves around the sun and in doing that passes through different areas so there are more meteorites at certain seasons than at others, so also the sun itself with the entire solar system around it has an orbit of its own. Orbit ? That would suggest a centre around which it revolves. I'm not sure of that, but it is clear that the entire solar system is not fixed in space. It must at least move with what some refer to as an "expanding universe".

So as it moves there is no reason to think that it cannot move into areas of different kinds of energy. Are these energies physical only ? What is the difference between physical energy and spiritual energy ? I have long believed that just as physical energy can be transformed into matter (E=mc square, a la Einstein), so also it seems likely that there is some similar relationship between spiritual energy (love) and physical energy. Well that is only my own intuitive feeling, but now we have some evidence that there really can be some vast changes affecting all the earth and all the planets at the same time. Whether the effect is physical only or also spiritual remains to be seen and experienced.

Now Igor also deserves some credit here. Without his input, his assurance that this scientist is credible, I would not have forwarded the report that follows. From the age of 10 when he lost both legs during a Nazi air raid, Igor has been a poet for peace writing and travelling and publishing books dedicated to a meaningful spiritual change for the earth.

I've known him since 1984 and met him personally in 1986, brought him to the U.S. in 1987. There is no question of his sincerity and dedication to peace. However, since the end of Communism when disabled people were fairly well cared for, things have not gone well for Igor. But in recent times he has been given an old computer and is now able to do email with many people across the world. Though he cannot himself access the web with his old equipment, a friend has created a website for him. That's how I found out that the scientific work which appears below is respectable. Please do visit his website and find out about his books. See the scientific report below. Peace and love, Art Rosenblum

http://www.crawford2000.co.uk/planetchange1.htm

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

crystal sage,

subjects such as the one above are probably more suited to metaphysics forum than the space and astronomy forum. They are more likely to finder a readership that apreciates them there.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

http://netmar.com/~maat/archive/mar2/changes.htm

"An important newcomer to the space age: Mars Pathfinder is the first lander to carry a small mobile exploration robot, Sojourner. The six-wheel rover, controlled from Earth, begins exploring the Martian soil on July 6, 1997, and returns data on the geology of the planet for nearly three months. The lander is equipped with a camera capable of photographing Sojourner while it explores the environment. Communication with Mars Pathfinder is lost on September 27 for unknown reasons, but the mission is a resounding success."

http://www.space.gc.ca/asc/eng/exploration/mars_1990.asp

may be the person got confused with this event

http://www.isslr.org/biblio/abstracts2002....atrium######%22

And what makes it so hard to believe there is evidence of salt..on the moon???

:yes:

Discovery of lunar tail advances study of the moon's atmosphere

By Hope Green

Boston University astronomers have discovered a tail of sodium gas half a million miles long streaming from the moon. In the process, they have developed a novel observation technique that could aid future studies of the lunar atmosphere.

"For the first time we have direct evidence that meteors hitting the lunar surface vaporize sodium in the rock and soil, contributing to the moon's sodium atmosphere," says Jody Wilson, a research associate in the Center for Space Physics (CSP). "We have also learned that we can observe the moon's atmosphere during the new-moon phase. No one had ever thought that would be possible."

The findings of the BU research team, led by Michael Mendillo, CAS professor of astronomy, were published in the June 15 issue of the American Geophysical Union journal, Geophysical Research Letters.

http://www.bu.edu/bridge/archive/1999/07-02/features1.html

Two years ago the density of the Moon's sodium tail tripled just after the 1998 Leonid fireball shower," he continued. "The meteoroids in '98 were larger than usual and they were really slamming the Moon when they hit. There's no doubt that the primary source of the exosphere at that time was the Leonids."

http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2000/ast26oct_1.htm

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/363105.stm

Edited by crystal sage

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We have been hit with some of these salty meteorites too!!!

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/431496.stm

I wonder if ithe moon was hit with the red rain as well???That would certainly speed up evolution.... ;)

http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0601022

http://www.sundayherald.com/53577

http://www.popsci.com/popsci/science/2c21c...ecbccdrcrd.html

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 1

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.