Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 2
An Urban Legend

9/11 Bombshell:WTC7 Security Official Details

1,024 posts in this topic

linked-image

The Alex Jones show today welcomed Loose Change creators Dylan Avery and Jason Burmas to discuss an exclusive interview they have conducted with an individual with high level security clearance who was inside the Office of Emergency Management in World Trade Center 7 and has descibed and detailed explosions inside the building prior to the collapse of any of the buildings at ground zero on 9/11.

The interview, to be featured in the forthcoming Final Cut of Loose Change is currently under wraps but the creators have allowed some details to leak purely to protect themselves and the individual involved who has asked to remain anonymous until the film is released.

While details remain scant for obvious reasons, we can reveal that the individual concerned was asked to report to building seven with a city official after the first attack on the North tower but before the second plane hit the South Tower and before their eventual collapse, in order to provide the official with access to different floors of the building.

The city official he was escorting was attempting to reach Rudy Guiliani, who he had determined was inside building 7 at that time. According to Avery and Burmas this official now works for Guiliani partners.

The individual was also asked to provide access to the Office Of Emergency Management on the 23rd floor of the building, this was the so called "bunker" that was built inside WTC7 on the orders of Rudy Guiliani.

When he got there he found the office evacuated and after making some calls was told to leave immediately.

It was at this point that he witnessed a bomb going off inside the building:

"We subsequently went to the stairwell and were going down the stairs, when we reached the sixth floor, the landing that we were standing on gave way, there was an explosion and the landing gave way. I was left there hanging, I had to climb back up and now had to walk back up to the eighth floor. After getting to the eighth floor everything was dark."

The individual in a second clip detailed hearing further explosions and then described what he saw when he got down to the lobby:

"It was totally destroyed, it looked like King Kong had been through it and stepped on it and it was so destroyed i didn't know where I was. It was so destroyed that had to take me out through a hole in the wall, a makeshift hole I believe the fire department made to get me out."

He was then told by firefighters to get twenty blocks away from the area because explosions were going off all over the World Trade Center complex.

The key to this information is that the individual testifies this all happened BEFORE either tower collapsed, thus building 7 was at that point completely undamaged from any falling debris or resulting fires. It also means that explosions were witnessed in WTC7 up to eight hours before its collapse at around 5.30pm.

Avery and Burmas, who played the two short clips of the interview prior to further analysis and more clips to be played on their own GCN radio show later tonight at 7pm CST, further described how the individual had witnessed dead bodies in the lobby of 7 and was told by the police not to look at them.

This is vital information be cause it is in direct conflict with the official claim that no one was killed inside building 7. The 9/11 Commission report did not even mention building, yet here we have a key witness who told them he saw dead people inside the building after explosions had gutted the lower level.

What makes all this information even more explosive is the fact that this individual was interviewed by the 9/11 Commission as they conducted their so called investigation.

The fact that the building was not even mentioned in the report in light of this information thus becomes chilling and indicates that officials have lied in stating that they have not come into contact with evidence of explosive devices within the buildings.

Avery and Burmas successfully contacted the individual after discovering a TV interview he did on 9/11 while they were trawling through news footage from the day in research for the Final Cut.

Avery says that he can and will prove beyond any shadow of doubt that the individual was in building 7 on 9/11 and that what he is saying is accurate.

Source

Boy, I cant wait for the interview in the Final Cut. Debunkers will just hate the part where it says explosions going off in building7 before either Towers collapse! Go think of a good excuse for that!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

linked-image

The Alex Jones show today welcomed Loose Change creators Dylan Avery and Jason Burmas to discuss an exclusive interview they have conducted with an individual with high level security clearance who was inside the Office of Emergency Management in World Trade Center 7 and has descibed and detailed explosions inside the building prior to the collapse of any of the buildings at ground zero on 9/11.

The interview, to be featured in the forthcoming Final Cut of Loose Change is currently under wraps but the creators have allowed some details to leak purely to protect themselves and the individual involved who has asked to remain anonymous until the film is released.

While details remain scant for obvious reasons, we can reveal that the individual concerned was asked to report to building seven with a city official after the first attack on the North tower but before the second plane hit the South Tower and before their eventual collapse, in order to provide the official with access to different floors of the building.

The city official he was escorting was attempting to reach Rudy Guiliani, who he had determined was inside building 7 at that time. According to Avery and Burmas this official now works for Guiliani partners.

The individual was also asked to provide access to the Office Of Emergency Management on the 23rd floor of the building, this was the so called "bunker" that was built inside WTC7 on the orders of Rudy Guiliani.

When he got there he found the office evacuated and after making some calls was told to leave immediately.

It was at this point that he witnessed a bomb going off inside the building:

"We subsequently went to the stairwell and were going down the stairs, when we reached the sixth floor, the landing that we were standing on gave way, there was an explosion and the landing gave way. I was left there hanging, I had to climb back up and now had to walk back up to the eighth floor. After getting to the eighth floor everything was dark."

The individual in a second clip detailed hearing further explosions and then described what he saw when he got down to the lobby:

"It was totally destroyed, it looked like King Kong had been through it and stepped on it and it was so destroyed i didn't know where I was. It was so destroyed that had to take me out through a hole in the wall, a makeshift hole I believe the fire department made to get me out."

He was then told by firefighters to get twenty blocks away from the area because explosions were going off all over the World Trade Center complex.

The key to this information is that the individual testifies this all happened BEFORE either tower collapsed, thus building 7 was at that point completely undamaged from any falling debris or resulting fires. It also means that explosions were witnessed in WTC7 up to eight hours before its collapse at around 5.30pm.

Avery and Burmas, who played the two short clips of the interview prior to further analysis and more clips to be played on their own GCN radio show later tonight at 7pm CST, further described how the individual had witnessed dead bodies in the lobby of 7 and was told by the police not to look at them.

This is vital information be cause it is in direct conflict with the official claim that no one was killed inside building 7. The 9/11 Commission report did not even mention building, yet here we have a key witness who told them he saw dead people inside the building after explosions had gutted the lower level.

What makes all this information even more explosive is the fact that this individual was interviewed by the 9/11 Commission as they conducted their so called investigation.

The fact that the building was not even mentioned in the report in light of this information thus becomes chilling and indicates that officials have lied in stating that they have not come into contact with evidence of explosive devices within the buildings.

Avery and Burmas successfully contacted the individual after discovering a TV interview he did on 9/11 while they were trawling through news footage from the day in research for the Final Cut.

Avery says that he can and will prove beyond any shadow of doubt that the individual was in building 7 on 9/11 and that what he is saying is accurate.

Source

Boy, I cant wait for the interview in the Final Cut. Debunkers will just hate the part where it says explosions going off in building7 before either Towers collapse! Go think of a good excuse for that!

Another piece of crucial evidence which evidently will lead to the debunkers "TRYING" to mislead people with there information being gospel.

Wow the lobby of the Twin Towers looked like a bomb exploded, now with this evidence here the lobby of the WTC7 looked like a bomb had exploded with the witness testimonial referring to at least 7 people dying in the lobby how could this be so when no plane hit WTC7? Simple answer: Explosives were present.

Inside Job? DEFINITELY.

Edited by The Legend

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Wow the lobby of the Twin Towers looked like a bomb exploded, now with this evidence here the lobby of the WTC7 looked like a bomb had exploded with the witness testimonial referring to at least 7 people dying in the lobby how could this be so when no plane hit WTC7? Simple answer: Explosives were present.
Exactly. The official account will maintain that jet fuel from the initial impact travelled down the elevator shafts all the way down into the lobby erupting into a large fireball type explosion, in this account from building 7 there is nothing to account for the lobby damage because no plane hit building 7 and not to mention the Twin towers had not yet collapse so there isnt ANY damage to the building from debris or anything of that sort which would leave the lobby in such a destructive condition. The only logical alternative debunkers fail to concede to is that, based upon all of this information and Eye Witness testimony, 9/11 was an inside job; explosives were planted in the building(s) and in order for that to be so elements within the U.S government would have to be responsible. I rest my case.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

Oh really. Would the governement agents have exploded your bomb in the lobby had the highjacking failed?

Why not just bring down the Tower like the attempt on 1993 and blame the terrorist, think about it.

Alex Jones is making a living really out of your imaginations, wise up folks!

Edited by AROCES

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Oh really. Would the governement agents have exploded your bomb in the lobby had the highjacking failed?
AROCES, sorry, I dont have time to play the "what if" game, try addressing the present facts instead of brainstorming about what would have happened if things went different. And anyways, it was reported that there was a large explosion within the basement of one of the towers BEFORE the first plane even hit! What would coincidentally cause that? Was this explosion imaginary!? I doubt the culprits would have exploded any bombs within any of the towers had the planes not been present to act as a diversion. No planes=No fire=No damage=no dislogged fireproofing= no impact=no collapse. The government needed the planes present so they would have something to contribute to as to why the buildings collapsed, if they would have just straight out controlled demolitioned it with no planes/terrorist to take blame people would easily have figured out it was an inside job.

Why not just bring down the Tower like the attempt on 1993 and blame the terrorist, think about it.
Well you seem to overlook that, that is exactly what did happen on 9/11!!! They did bring down the towers(+b7), and then blamed it on terrorist; just because they're method of destruction wasnt the same as in 1993 that doesnt stop them from bringing the buildings down. With the way they did it on 9/11 they made sure with certainty that those towers were coming down. Very different from the truck bomb in 93, one large bomb which was suppose to blow out the main support columns and bring the building down, but on 9/11 they made sure it was coming down, people in and around the buildings heard MULTIPLE explosions going off in the towers! All 3 of them! Now you THINK about that!

Alex Jones is making a living really out of your imaginations, wise up folks!

"Today, America would be outraged if U.N. troops entered Los Angeles to restore order [referring to the 1991 LA Riot]. Tomorrow they will be grateful! This is especially true if they were told that there were an outside threat from beyond [i.e., an "extraterrestrial" invasion], whether real or *promulgated* [emphasis by original compiler], that threatened our very existence. It is then that all peoples of the world will plead to deliver them from this evil. The one thing every man fears is the unknown. When presented with this *scenario*, individual rights will be willingly relinquished for the guarantee of their well-being granted to them by the World Government."

Henry Kissinger speaking at Evian, France, May 21, 1992

Bilderburgers meeting.

Unbeknownst to Kissinger,

his speech was taped by a Swiss delegate to the meeting.

"In politics, nothing happens by accident. If it happens, it was planned that way." -- Franklin D. Roosevelt

"The real rulers in Washington are invisible and exercise their power from behind the

scenes."-- Justice Felix Frankfurter, U.S. Supreme Court.

"I am concerned for the security of our great nation; not so much because of any threat from without, but because of the insideous forces working from within." -- General Douglas MacArthur

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here's another very good article on that topic:

FBI Withholding 84 More Tapes of Pentagon on 9/11

Magically Only 1 shows impact so why not release the rest?

Steve Watson / Infowars | May 17 2006

The FBI is withholding at least another 84 surveillance tapes that were seized in the immediate aftermath of the attack on the Pentagon.

There is an ongoing lawsuit to get....

Source Link: http://infowars.net/articles/may2006/17050...agon_videos.htm

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Here's another very good article on that topic:

FBI Withholding 84 More Tapes of Pentagon on 9/11

Magically Only 1 shows impact so why not release the rest?

Steve Watson / Infowars | May 17 2006

The FBI is withholding at least another 84 surveillance tapes that were seized in the immediate aftermath of the attack on the Pentagon.

There is an ongoing lawsuit to get....

Source Link: http://infowars.net/articles/may2006/17050...agon_videos.htm

NO, its nothing shocking, it's painfully obvious they have something to hide! The people can want those tapes released all they want, but because they show something other than a boeing hitting the Pentagon, they WONT be released, EVER. But of course there is that one alternative to them releasing the tapes, they'll release all 84 tapes no problem, ......just as soon as they finish editing the #!@#$%@ out of them. :whistle: This is just like with the Oklahoma city bombing, there were multiple mounted security cameras which caught the entire bombing on tape with McVeigh and his accomplises fleeing the scene together, but guess what? They never got the FBI to release those tapes until this day because the story had to be that McVeigh acted alone with the detonation of a single truck bomb. It's ridiculous, on that day there were many eye witnesses including live news reporters who reported that they heard more than one explosion, not to mention the bomb squad admitting to finding more devices within the building all larger than the first. With the Pentagon tapes its no different, same pattern, those tapes wont get released.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

nonsence again, i was there, i heard no blasts before collapse, not one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Oh really. Would the governement agents have exploded your bomb in the lobby had the highjacking failed?

Why not just bring down the Tower like the attempt on 1993 and blame the terrorist, think about it.

Alex Jones is making a living really out of your imaginations, wise up folks!

Not out of our imaginations. George Bush and Dick Cheney are making BILLIONS on the gullible stupidity of Americans.

Alex Jones is fantastic. Check out his site at www.prisonplanet.com

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

AROCES, sorry, I dont have time to play the "what if" game, try addressing the present facts instead of brainstorming about what would have happened if things went different. And anyways, it was reported that there was a large explosion within the basement of one of the towers BEFORE the first plane even hit! What would coincidentally cause that? Was this explosion imaginary!? I doubt the culprits would have exploded any bombs within any of the towers had the planes not been present to act as a diversion. No planes=No fire=No damage=no dislogged fireproofing= no impact=no collapse. The government needed the planes present so they would have something to contribute to as to why the buildings collapsed, if they would have just straight out controlled demolitioned it with no planes/terrorist to take blame people would easily have figured out it was an inside job.

No diversion needed in 1993, they simply tried to bring down the tower with a basement bomb. NOW, why do it again and obviously it did not bring it down again if that is the case, right?

So, if the highjacking fails, they remove the bomb??? I mean why not just explode it and blame the terrorist, quite simple huh?

Now, do you by chance see how idotic this Alex Jones crap is?

Someone heard a bomb explode, WHO? How come there was no Alarm in the building then when the bomb exploded?

Who was it reported to? With all the security in the building, who looked into it?

All Alex Jones has is someone who saw Big Foot or a 50 foot snake.

Well you seem to overlook that, that is exactly what did happen on 9/11!!! They did bring down the towers(+b7), and then blamed it on terrorist; just because they're method of destruction wasnt the same as in 1993 that doesnt stop them from bringing the buildings down. With the way they did it on 9/11 they made sure with certainty that those towers were coming down. Very different from the truck bomb in 93, one large bomb which was suppose to blow out the main support columns and bring the building down, but on 9/11 they made sure it was coming down, people in and around the buildings heard MULTIPLE explosions going off in the towers! All 3 of them! Now you THINK about that!

3 people have a different story against the hundreds others who did not hear or know of any pre explosions??? And because of those 3 who is not even sure themeselves I bet, you are accusing others of murdering their fellow Americans? You worst really than those you accuse of murders.

Edited by AROCES

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Not out of our imaginations. George Bush and Dick Cheney are making BILLIONS on the gullible stupidity of Americans.

Alex Jones is fantastic. Check out his site at www.prisonplanet.com

Show me their TAX returns of Billions of income? You can't, well?

Alex Jones really is the one who's market is the you know who Americans.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
nonsence again, i was there, i heard no blasts before collapse, not one.
I agree, these people are several bricks shy of a load...LOL!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
nonsence again, i was there, i heard no blasts before collapse, not one.

I spoke to firefighters that were inside the building who said they heard explosions before they were getting out of the building before the collapse, so there is conflicting stories. I have a tendency to trust the guys inside the building as they were inside immediately before the collapse.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The new witness seems to have had an eventful time inside WTC7. How did he fit it all in to the available time before the first collapse? Is he really certain that his "bomb" wasn't the collapse?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Color me skeptical, but its a huge coincidence that he just happened to be in the right place at the right time to see the bomb go off and had enough sense about him to stop his fall when the stairway collapsed.

And its interesting to note they don't tell us how he got out...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The new witness seems to have had an eventful time inside WTC7. How did he fit it all in to the available time before the first collapse? Is he really certain that his "bomb" wasn't the collapse?

I need to clarify, he was not inside 7, but getting out of 1 when he heard what he felt to be an explosion. The reason he felt it was an explosion rather than just the collapse itself is that he heard the crack of high explosives. He told me that he had been present for several demolitions in his career and believed the sound to be the explosives, not the collapse itself.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Simple answer: Explosives were present.

Inside Job? DEFINITELY.

How do you know it was an inside job? Maybe the terrorists planted bombs in the WTC, and the government is covering that up! Oooooooooh!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Color me skeptical, but its a huge coincidence that he just happened to be in the right place at the right time to see the bomb go off and had enough sense about him to stop his fall when the stairway collapsed.

And its interesting to note they don't tell us how he got out...

Would you say its a bizarre coincidence?

He got out through a hole in the wall.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

How do you know it was an inside job? Maybe the terrorists planted bombs in the WTC, and the government is covering that up! Oooooooooh!

So, your best argument that is wasn't an inside job, is that there is a conspiracy to cover up what realy happened?

Edited by el midgetron

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I spoke to firefighters that were inside the building who said they heard explosions before they were getting out of the building before the collapse, so there is conflicting stories. I have a tendency to trust the guys inside the building as they were inside immediately before the collapse.

A 767 was just slammed over where this Firefighters were, and they wonder why they hear explosions??? Debri falling on the street, in the elevator chute.

Quite easy really to assume they were bombs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
How do you know it was an inside job? Maybe the terrorists planted bombs in the WTC, and the government is covering that up! Oooooooooh!

Oh yeah :tu: Very good point here. Why they assume it was the governement and not the terrorist who planted those bombs. HAH! shows they want the governement to be the culprit.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Oh yeah :tu: Very good point here. Why they assume it was the governement and not the terrorist who planted those bombs. HAH! shows they want the governement to be the culprit.

It is a good point. At best the government is covering up what happened. Why??

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Oh yeah :tu: Very good point here. Why they assume it was the governement and not the terrorist who planted those bombs. HAH! shows they want the governement to be the culprit.

You don't get it do you. No one wants it to be the goverment but when the goverment fails to explain what happened properly and that includes the wtc 7, people want to know. If you smell something fishy and you don't like the smell you hunt for the source of that smell and get ride of it, and this stinks to high heaven. I don't have a souce but will look if you want one, but 42% of americans think the goverment had some sort of involvment. Does 42% not warrent a deeper look or another look into this?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I need to clarify, he was not inside 7, but getting out of 1 when he heard what he felt to be an explosion.

???

It says quite clearly that he was on the 23rd floor of WTC7.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 2

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.