Wednesday, May 4, 2016   |   3,725 users online
Contact us    |    Advertise    |   Help   RSS icon Twitter icon Facebook icon
    Home  ·  News  ·  Forum  ·  Stories  ·  Image Gallery  ·  Columns  ·  Encyclopedia  ·  Videos  ·  Chat
Find: in
  Birthday party negative
Birthday party negative
Image credit: © kool_shen


<< Previous image in this category
 Ghost in road
Next image in this category >>
 Birthday party negative
Comments on this image:
Comment icon #64 Posted by MisterSuperGod on 10 March, 2014, 15:01
One of the faces looks drunk as all hell. One of the few really good pics posted here!
Comment icon #63 Posted by 95-Nasty on 7 May, 2013, 12:42
I see three faces, very weird!
Comment icon #62 Posted by Celestial_Blu on 28 May, 2012, 16:09
They look like they're a part of a victorian school boys choir - amazing!
Comment icon #61 Posted by Celestial_Blu on 28 May, 2012, 16:04
For it to be a processing error she would have had to taken a pic before or after this shot with that boy(s) in I'm sure she'd know. Plus the negative does not look damaged at all. Really interesting pic, fantastic shot! Thanks for posting.
Comment icon #60 Posted by minera on 9 August, 2011, 5:06
I don't know about you guys but I see five faces in total. The front one seems to be half a head with a head of a boy behind it then the man and the face with the fingerprint is on the forehead of the man bending down as if looking at something. The face in the front looks like it has its eyes closed but closer examination it has half a head and another right behind where the eyes and eyebrows would be. It is weird but not sure if it is paranormal.
Comment icon #59 Posted by Blues Girl on 20 June, 2011, 14:30
This is pretty cool!
Comment icon #58 Posted by Yellow Jacket on 8 December, 2010, 3:34
This one brings questions. Pretty cool stuff. Even if it is not real, it is pretty crazy looking.
Comment icon #57 Posted by tattooguy on 10 August, 2010, 10:33
Does noone ever consider that this could be a simple processing error by whoever developed the film? I am guessing that since it is colour film you did not develop this yourself and had it developed in a lab? I have had some films come out strange because they have been mishandles, the negs get damaged and it shows as an anomoly on the print
Comment icon #56 Posted by ellejay on 24 July, 2010, 2:40
though i do see a fingerprint on the uppermost face...
Comment icon #55 Posted by ellejay on 24 July, 2010, 2:39
im freaked out now. question to pic taker- do you recognize any of these people??
Comment icon #54 Posted by mallmo on 6 May, 2010, 18:48
ok the "ghost" are to close to gather they all ook alike in ways ......FAKE double triple exposer or sumin nice try tho
Comment icon #53 Posted by ghost kid 101 on 9 July, 2008, 18:15
you can see it on the NEG. and POS.,, creepy.
Comment icon #52 Posted by girlieghost on 2 July, 2008, 1:18
the faces are detailed! very creepy! nice pic :]
Comment icon #51 Posted by ericofbodom on 30 June, 2008, 19:55
i see three faces
Comment icon #50 Posted by s.t.u. on 10 December, 2007, 3:19
I am very fimiliar with these type of spirits showing up. I live in a paranomally active home, actually very active home. I have some similar photos this however is amazing, mine aren't this wonderful. I think if this was a fake, you would not have gone through all the trouble to have scanned it and put it up. Not all negatives show every detail of the photo when there is ectoplasm active. Test this... take this photo and invert it.. see what you get. The child is beautiful. She looks up alot and laughs? Does she babble when she is alone?
Comment icon #49 Posted by dark_fairie on 22 October, 2007, 6:52
Why are they all in a stairstep row? and it looks like the reflection of the playpen netting on the top one. Whether its real or not..its creepy.
Comment icon #48 Posted by twegner on 20 August, 2007, 22:41
the faces are very detailed. nice pic
Comment icon #47 Posted by offamychain on 7 August, 2007, 4:48
The picture doesn't match up with the negative at all. There's a fingerprint on the negative & the picture has been manipulated by adding the faces. You can even see the finger "prints" in this picture, on the top "face". Nothing "unexplained" here.
Comment icon #46 Posted by tamsen on 4 August, 2007, 12:16
It's a fingerprint, 100%... 100% fake, everyone! 100% fake!
Comment icon #45 Posted by valkyrievoice on 6 June, 2007, 3:16
I see 3 faces as well. It would be interesting to find out who those people were/are.
Comment icon #44 Posted by spiridion on 8 April, 2007, 1:10
The ghost closest to the baby's head looks like it has netting, like the netting of the playpen. This is certainly creepy! The faces are undeniable.
Comment icon #43 Posted by nothinggreatstaysthesame on 6 April, 2007, 20:52
..........what's most fascinating is that the 4 ghosts appears to be of late 19th century or early 20th century and the baby is of the present!!! I always believed that old ghosts are lingering all around us!!!
Comment icon #42 Posted by morgan on 1 February, 2007, 7:15
ectoplasm my ass. I'm pretty sure the child would have been prone to see the "ghost". It really does look like double exposure to me.
Comment icon #41 Posted by apriabella on 21 January, 2007, 8:15
I think its real, people dont use babies on their birthdays to make fake photos, at least I would hope not plus I agree with others its to well defined..clothes are out of date..which means spooky to me.
Comment icon #40 Posted by icyingdeath on 20 January, 2007, 21:15
ok wow you people are stupid there looks to be a finger print in the back the one that looks pinkish but the other two look nothing like it, you can see there cloths as well the tops of there collars look! and thoughs two are def not smudges coem up with a better excuse
Comment icon #39 Posted by deaditequeen on 16 September, 2006, 8:54
The faces are unmistakable and if you will notice they are facing the tv/entertainment center, which according to theory would be providing them with the electrical power necessary to manifest in this form
Comment icon #38 Posted by ziggen on 14 August, 2006, 1:07
looks like a double exposure.. but it's still cool because the faces are so distinct.
Comment icon #37 Posted by american chupacabra on 5 July, 2006, 19:55
Finger prints? Look at the top of the pic above the heads. You will see an arm too.
Comment icon #36 Posted by artemisthehunter on 21 June, 2006, 3:28
Those are fingerprints.
Comment icon #35 Posted by keira on 17 June, 2006, 19:55
Ithink its fingerprints, but you have to admit its pretty freaky that faces are in them.....
Comment icon #34 Posted by matt1 on 18 May, 2006, 17:03
Hi there I reckon it is a clever fake, simply because as someone has said already could be fingerprints, ( look at the upermost face, you can see the ridges of what could be a fingerprint even if you look closely on the second face the same fingerprint would be evident) Im not saying it is a fake just that I think the evidence speaks for itself.
Comment icon #33 Posted by ythompson86 on 8 April, 2006, 20:55
I agree about the fingerprints, but mine generally don't have faces on them...or maybe I just haven't looked close enough. ;-)
Comment icon #32 Posted by tengu on 8 April, 2006, 16:34
Looks like someone put some fingerprints on their negatives and then developed the picture. You can see the fingerprint swirls in the pic. No ghost here
Comment icon #31 Posted by najaesouljah on 24 March, 2006, 0:24
thats a neat picture.
Comment icon #30 Posted by mizz squitz on 9 March, 2006, 0:53
hi, just like to add if you enlarge pics of so called orbs, they seem to have a structure to them similar to fingerprint whirls.
Comment icon #29 Posted by voodoodaddy on 26 January, 2006, 2:37
BuyMeAPony, anyone who puts his/her finger on the picture side of a photograph while handling it will leave fingerprint whorls on it. ffffP
Comment icon #28 Posted by buymeapony on 4 January, 2006, 5:14
Looks like no one has noticed that the face towards the back has fingerprint whirls. Pffff
Comment icon #27 Posted by genevieve on 3 January, 2006, 23:44
I see 3 faces. Very cool. I don't know if it's real or not but I hope she didn't show it to her tot, cause I know that would freak me out for years to come.
Comment icon #26 Posted by voodoodaddy44 on 4 December, 2005, 10:43
My apologies. The negative makes total sense, now that I see the faces. Yep, it's real, all right.
Comment icon #25 Posted by klausable on 1 December, 2005, 20:18
ok...i see the 2 faces.Looks like the one behind is pleasuring the one in front:)
Comment icon #24 Posted by crissangelslave on 29 November, 2005, 6:26
2 faces looks like there in pain screaming for help.
Comment icon #23 Posted by juan carlos on 16 November, 2005, 0:16
thats creepy and scary!!
Comment icon #22 Posted by zig864 on 14 November, 2005, 15:10
Cool photo looks like one to investigate.
Comment icon #21 Posted by mtswf4lf on 12 November, 2005, 1:43
how old is this picture? Everthing looks a little out of date but its still kinda freaky. I can see how the tv is reflecting one of the faces on to the camera but the other ones arent that easily explained. could be photoshopped but who knows.
Comment icon #20 Posted by dweebs on 5 November, 2005, 2:01
Is that a television way in the back? It looks like the top face is definately overtaken by a finger smudge, and the bottom faces could be a reflection on the smudge from the television in the back.
Comment icon #19 Posted by jimmytheclown on 27 October, 2005, 15:54
I agree. Looks like fingerprints that came out as faces. Happened to me when i was little and smudged the lens with my finger. The photo had a face in it. Sorry, but this just don't look real to me! :(
Comment icon #18 Posted by duskwalker on 6 October, 2005, 1:08
Looks like a fake to me, could it not be just smudges from dirty fingetprints? Faces can be seen in anything from dirt smudges to pieces of wood if you study it for long enough!! It is not convincing to me but cute kid!!
Comment icon #17 Posted by kenzie_the_unexplained on 2 October, 2005, 21:52
..I believe that the faces are evil llama people of Canada made of Blue cheese!Feed them dirty carrots and peace will be brang!
Comment icon #16 Posted by marcin t on 30 September, 2005, 3:26
WOW and if right now something are behin you ? OMG !!!
Comment icon #15 Posted by hephaestus on 29 September, 2005, 23:33
Great pic!! Doesn't smell fake to me. Spooky. Wonder if this has any connection to EVP?
Comment icon #14 Posted by frogfish on 20 September, 2005, 2:44
very strange, i dont know what to say
Comment icon #13 Posted by soonerlover on 7 September, 2005, 22:08
Very strange. Is a cute kid
Comment icon #12 Posted by pepperw2 on 7 September, 2005, 0:06
That's just plain out weird!!!!!! Cute baby!!! I hope she had a happy birthday despite the uninvited guests.
Comment icon #11 Posted by fennel on 26 August, 2005, 9:16
one problem... the negative shows less of the image than the print! Look at where the image ends on the left and right sides of the print and the negative. The negative would show at least as much of the image as the print, if not more, because the print would be mad efrom the negative. It's a very clever fake of a negative, thats my theory. Not that I wouldn't like it to be real, that would be cool...
Comment icon #10 Posted by Idriss on 24 August, 2005, 6:16
kool pic. if you look at it the faces are glaring at the child!. maybe they are some of her dead relatives?! they don't look melovent quite friendly looking and want to share her birthday celebrations :)
Comment icon #9 Posted by jonb on 5 August, 2005, 1:12
dunno what to think of this, you could re creatie it using a double exposure (as it is on the negative) by getting people to wear black and have burst fires from a flashgun, or perhaps if the camera was pointed at the tv briefly and the frames of a face were captured 3 or 4 times... very odd pic
Comment icon #8 Posted by shiggity shiggity shwa on 1 August, 2005, 23:08
thats scary!!
Comment icon #7 Posted by iseedeadppl on 29 July, 2005, 23:46
omg there are 4 not 3
Comment icon #6 Posted by iseedeadppl on 29 July, 2005, 23:46
I see 3 faces ... faces of old people ...very nice pic very creepy ... one on top ... there are two overlapping ... the one in the middle seems like a woman and the bottom face looks like a dead man ...Creepy
Comment icon #5 Posted by bogeyman on 29 July, 2005, 16:46
In lots of the seances in the late 1800's and early 1900's ,there tons of accounts of spirits forming when coming up out of the floor and also just shrinking through the floor......creepy
Comment icon #4 Posted by daisy0277 on 27 July, 2005, 8:45
The detail in the faces is absolutely incredible,......FASINATING!!!!
Comment icon #3 Posted by snowcloud182 on 27 July, 2005, 0:03
thats crazy, doesnt look fake
Comment icon #2 Posted by cryptosporidium137 on 26 July, 2005, 4:45
Looks like ectoplasm
Comment icon #1 Posted by atticgirl on 22 July, 2005, 17:21
Thats creepy.
Please Login or Register to post a comment.
Image information
July 21, 2005, 6:56 am
File size:
Upload an image
Recent news stories
Can a brain dead patient be brought back ?
Posted 5-4-2016 | 7 comments
A groundbreaking new trial is aiming to find a way to regenerate the brains of clinically dead patients.
Three new Earth-sized planets discovered
Posted 5-3-2016 | 6 comments
Astronomers have identified three new terrestrial worlds around a relatively close 'ultracool' star.
Scientists build the world's smallest engine
Posted 5-3-2016 | 8 comments
University of Cambridge physicists have created an engine that is one million times smaller than an ant.
Ancient horse racing rules found in Turkey
Posted 5-3-2016 | 9 comments
Archaeologists have deciphered a 2,000-year-old tablet inscribed with the rules of a horse racing event.
Elephant is spotted flying over Disneyland
Posted 5-2-2016 | 11 comments
Visitors to the popular theme park were amazed to see an elephant flying high above the attractions.
Will it soon be possible to live to 1,000 ?
Posted 5-2-2016 | 34 comments
Dr Aubrey de Grey maintains that the first person to live for hundreds of years has already been born.
Mysterious lines show up in the Caspian Sea
Posted 5-2-2016 | 9 comments
A chaotic pattern of scour marks in the Tyuleniy Archipelago has been photographed by a NASA satellite.
Google patents injectable eyeball computer
Posted 5-1-2016 | 21 comments
The search giant appears to be working on a device that can be injected directly in to your eyeballs.
Top   |  Home   |   Forum   |   News   |   Image Gallery   |  Columns   |   Encyclopedia   |   Videos   |   Polls
UM-X 10.6 2001-2015
Privacy Policy and Disclaimer   |   Cookies   |   Advertise   |   Contact   |   Help/FAQ