Moving the camera while the shutter is open causes the effect of the objects appearing to be in two places. And the explanation for the fact that the girl's head seems to have moved to the right while the houses didn't is simple: the girl actually moves; the houses don't.

If I moved my camera while the shutter was opened wouldnt the whole picture be messed up or show movement? In this picture there was one person paying attention to me and stopped for me to take this picture...the others were moving and getting ready to change out their uniforms...If this is a motion shot then why isnt the motion showing in the kids while they are moving...instead it is showing up in the houses that dont move...

I can see how the sutter or double exposure my affect a picture maybe on the left or right side of a picture with movement...In this picture you can see a totally messed up top and a perfect bottom...How is this possible?

You actually can see the shapes of the other people's heads above them, in varying degrees of distinctiveness depending on the the amount of light being reflected by them and the objects behind them. With motion blur, you'll often see portions of the subjects in near-perfect focus, with blurred images trailing next to them. There is nothing at all unusual here. I don't understand what you're trying to accomplish. Is your theory that the second image of the girl's head is a ghostly doppelganger?

SquareTraveler, I am simply sharing some of my weird pictures I have been taking over the years at the request of friends...The only thing I am trying to accomplish is opening other people mind just as mine was opened to other possibilities that people say does not happen or does not exist in this world...I'm also trying to understand motion blur and double exposure...

You're having the opposite impact. My mind was much more open to the possibilities before I came to this site. Easily debunked photos like these make rational people doubt that there has ever been any genuine evidence for the supernatural. This is exactly why I'm a hard-nosed skeptic about evidence, despite being still inclined to believe.

October Last AKA "Square Traveler"...Not sure why you changed your name but all the photos I have placed on this website are true pictures...I have not altered them in any way shape or form...I placed them on here to help others just as they have helped me understand and believe...I never once said there was a ghost /spirit in this picture. picture...If you would take the time to read my other/first post about this picture you would see it was to better understand motion blur...

I'm sorry you feel I am giving you the opposite impact...Some of the pictures I had posted up until this one had people in them that was called motion blur because they claimed the people moved...This picture the people was moving except for the one possing and the motion blur showed up on the houses that dont move behind them...

If I moved my camera to capture this motion blur than why isnt the whole picture showing the same amount of motion blur...If I moved my camera with the shutter still opened why did my camera decide to pick the images that did not move to show the motion blur? This makes no since to me...Why did my camera just pick up one girl and the houses to show motion blur...Why didnt it pick up the rest of the kids that were moving and show the same motion blur?

October Last if your mind was much more opened to the possibilities before you came to this website and all we are doing is "Debunking" you with our photos then why are you still here looking and putting other people photo's down? I think a part of you does believe in the possibilities but your looking in the wrong place to truly believe...Grab your own camera and call the ghost/spirits in so that you can see for yourself...The more you really want to see the better the possibiliy will be that you will get you own photo to prove to yourself they do exist...