Tuesday, April 23, 2024
Contact    |    RSS icon Twitter icon Facebook icon  
Unexplained Mysteries
You are viewing: Home > News > Science & Technology > News story
Welcome Guest ( Login or Register )  
All ▾
Search Submit

Science & Technology

Oldest known Earth fragment discovered

By T.K. Randall
February 25, 2014 · Comment icon 12 comments

A cut Zircon crystal. Image Credit: CC BY-SA 3.0 Gunnar Ries Amphibol
Scientists have identified a zircon crystal in Australia that dates back more than 4.375 billion years.
Among some of the toughest materials on the planet, Zircons are important to scientists as not only can they survive the tumultuous conditions that followed the Earth's formation but some can also trap small bubbles of gas from the planet's earliest atmosphere.
The discovery in Australia of a crystal dating back to just 165 million years after the Earth formed has therefore provided experts with a unique opportunity to learn more about the atmospheric conditions at that time. What they discovered was that the Earth is likely to have cooled within just 100 million years of the collision that brought about the formation of the moon.

"The zircons show us the earliest Earth was more like the Earth we know today," said geochemist John Valley who lead the study. "It wasn't an inhospitable place."

Source: Fox News | Comments (12)




Other news and articles
Recent comments on this story
Comment icon #3 Posted by qxcontinuum 10 years ago
Bullocks, the dating methods we are using are inaccurate. There is no way to tell how old it truly is.
Comment icon #4 Posted by Imaginarynumber1 10 years ago
Bullocks, the dating methods we are using are inaccurate. There is no way to tell how old it truly is. They're actually not inaccurate. That's why we use them.
Comment icon #5 Posted by YukiEsmaElite0 10 years ago
Regardless, if that image is the same type of rock, it's beautiful. Just goes to show that with age, there's beauty.
Comment icon #6 Posted by Calibeliever 10 years ago
Bullocks, the dating methods we are using are inaccurate. There is no way to tell how old it truly is. Please explain?
Comment icon #7 Posted by paperdyer 10 years ago
This article says a collision. A while ago an article here theorized the Earth stole the Moon from Venus. I feel like Vinnie Barbarino "I'm so confused!"
Comment icon #8 Posted by dummy2b 10 years ago
You are not alone.Ever Tom Dick and Harry that says they know what happen a billion years ago are confused too.
Comment icon #9 Posted by watoom 10 years ago
Yes, but unless you were there to see the rocks form, you can't know how old they are. - Ken Ham Ken Ham is an embarrassment to Australia
Comment icon #10 Posted by seaturtlehorsesnake 10 years ago
Bullocks, the dating methods we are using are inaccurate. There is no way to tell how old it truly is. if every geologist in the world slammed their head into a desk upon seeing this post, it would cause a minor seismic event. fact.
Comment icon #11 Posted by psyche101 10 years ago
Ken Ham is an embarrassment to Australia And that is being very kind.
Comment icon #12 Posted by Codenwarra 10 years ago
I've seen the instruments used for this, in the basement at Geoscience Australia in Canberra. There are several around the world. http://www.ga.gov.au/about-us/our-facilities/laboratories/geochronology-facilities.html Zircons dated in 2000 or 2001. http://www.geology.wisc.edu/zircon/Wilde2001Nature.pdf


Please Login or Register to post a comment.


Our new book is out now!
Book cover

The Unexplained Mysteries
Book of Weird News

 AVAILABLE NOW 

Take a walk on the weird side with this compilation of some of the weirdest stories ever to grace the pages of a newspaper.

Click here to learn more

We need your help!
Patreon logo

Support us on Patreon

 BONUS CONTENT 

For less than the cost of a cup of coffee, you can gain access to a wide range of exclusive perks including our popular 'Lost Ghost Stories' series.

Click here to learn more

Recent news and articles