Tuesday, December 6, 2016
Contact us    |    Advertise    |   Help   RSS icon Twitter icon Facebook icon
    Home  ·  News  ·  Forum  ·  Stories  ·  Image Gallery  ·  Columns  ·  Encyclopedia  ·  Videos
Find: in

Dozens of Yeti hair samples DNA tested


Posted on Wednesday, 2 July, 2014 | Comment icon 182 comments

Could there still be an undiscovered primate roaming the mountains ? Image Credit: CC BY-SA 2.0 Dirk Hartung
Scientists have been analyzing samples of hair that are said to have originated from the elusive cryptid.
Oxford geneticist Bryan Sykes made headlines last year when he tested strands of alleged Yeti hairs recovered from the Himalayas and discovered that they seemed to belong to an extinct species of polar bear that lived 40,000 years ago.

Since then he has tested dozens more samples of hair thought to have originated from the cryptozoological biped as part of an ongoing project to try and solve the mystery once and for all.

His findings, which were published this week, indicate that almost all of the samples had come from cows, bears, porcupines, horses and an assortment of other mundane species. Despite this however Sykes is adamant that his research does not mean that Bigfoot can't still exist.

"I don't think this finishes the Bigfoot myth at all," he told NBC News. "What it does do is show that there is a way for Bigfoot enthusiasts to go back out into the forest and get the real thing."

The geneticist is now organizing an expedition to the Himalayas next year to seek out live specimens of the elusive polar bear species that his DNA testing had helped to identify.

"That's the next logical step," he said. "We need a live 'Yeti.'"

Source: NBC News | Comments (182)

Tags: Bigfoot, Yeti


 
Recent comments on this story
Comment icon #173 Posted by Sakari on 17 July, 2014, 2:41
Take a look at this link about a recently discovered creature 20 years ago. http://relivearth.co...ry-and-threats/. Read just this part, then see if you agree with me..... After this discovery, scientists did extensive research in the area. In next few years this research led to the discovery of 20 partial specimen of this species, including three complete skin and several photos. Researchers were also able to trap the species in remotely set camera in the rain forests. With all these evidences, scientists came to the conclusion that this is a completely new species and it was named as Saola (... [More]
Comment icon #174 Posted by DieChecker on 17 July, 2014, 2:51
The problem with finding a large mammal in a Vietnamese valley, and finding Bigfoot, is that a Bigfoot supposedly has a territory that spans an entire western state. A home range something on the order of 100,000 square miles. Where the Saola has a range of something like 1000 square miles. So it is 100 times easier to find with cameras and on foot. The only leveling factor would be how many bigfoots there are overlapping the same range. Could be 10, or 20... But unless it is 200+, you're still going to have BF being 10 to 100 times harder to find. And BF is more intelligent then an ox. Going ... [More]
Comment icon #175 Posted by Hawkin on 17 July, 2014, 2:58
Read just this part, then see if you agree with me..... Now, lets use that with Bigfoot : After this discovery, scientists did extensive research in the area............ One can argue that the first sighting was in 1811......But, lets not go that far....Lets go with this : Interest in Bigfoot began to pick up in the United States in 1958 when a bulldozer operator named Jerry Crew found enormous footprints around where he was working in Humboldt County, California. What that does not mention is those tracks were admitted to be made on purpose, to keep trespassers out.....Anyway, 1958 to 2014. 5... [More]
Comment icon #176 Posted by Sakari on 17 July, 2014, 2:58
The problem with finding a large mammal in a Vietnamese valley, and finding Bigfoot, is that a Bigfoot supposedly has a territory that spans an entire western state. A home range something on the order of 100,000 square miles. Where the Saola has a range of something like 1000 square miles. So it is 100 times easier to find with cameras and on foot. The only leveling factor would be how many bigfoots there are overlapping the same range. Could be 10, or 20... But unless it is 200+, you're still going to have BF being 10 to 100 times harder to find. And BF is more intelligent then an ox. Going ... [More]
Comment icon #177 Posted by Sakari on 17 July, 2014, 3:01
I'm not saying they exist. I'm just saying that it's a possibility they do considering that species have been rediscovered or new species have come to light. As for you saying you gave up on that fantasy. It would seem you still have an interest in it more then you realize since you visit these threads and discuss it. But that's ok. I do have an interest in it. I have said numerous times, I used to believe in it. " used to ". As I have stated, my interest is in why some people still do believe, and believe to the point of getting defensive and mad. Not saying you, saying some people. I do not ... [More]
Comment icon #178 Posted by DieChecker on 17 July, 2014, 3:18
How many people hunt, hike, work, and live in those areas of Vietnahm versus the PNW. Per capita, I would be willing to bet more people ( and guns and trail cams ) per square mile frequent the PNW, and/or live in it, work in it, hunt in it, hike in it. Perhaps. But the US has a population density of 32 people per square kilometer, while Vietnam as a population density of 268. About 10 times denser population. That would mean more hunters and more wood gatherers, and more people wandering about in my opinion (per square kilometer). http://en.wikipedia....ulation_density
Comment icon #179 Posted by Sakari on 17 July, 2014, 10:46
Perhaps. But the US has a population density of 32 people per square kilometer, while Vietnam as a population density of 268. About 10 times denser population. That would mean more hunters and more wood gatherers, and more people wandering about in my opinion (per square kilometer). http://en.wikipedia....ulation_density I'm that case. http://www.bigfootencounters.com/creatures/pj.htm
Comment icon #180 Posted by Myles on 17 July, 2014, 12:12
Or homeless people... or even hikers that want to be found. Sakari does have a point that if BF was real, we should have found some good evidence by now. But that is not a sure thing.... Someone had physical evidence of these already though. Big difference.
Comment icon #181 Posted by Rafterman on 17 July, 2014, 15:45
The problem with finding a large mammal in a Vietnamese valley, and finding Bigfoot, is that a Bigfoot supposedly has a territory that spans an entire western state. A home range something on the order of 100,000 square miles. Where the Saola has a range of something like 1000 square miles. So it is 100 times easier to find with cameras and on foot. The only leveling factor would be how many bigfoots there are overlapping the same range. Could be 10, or 20... But unless it is 200+, you're still going to have BF being 10 to 100 times harder to find. And BF is more intelligent then an ox. Going ... [More]
Comment icon #182 Posted by Thorvir Hrothgaard on 17 July, 2014, 16:11
Maybe Bigfoot is really human...inflicted with some sort of lycanthropy. His more "animal" form isn't some terrifying creature that eats humans, but more shy and careful. After the cycle is up, he returns to human form, completely forgetting his recent activites--or, alternatively, he knows exactly what is happening and takes steps to make sure he isn't found out. That would explain his sightings throughout the world, even though it's sparse enough that it couldn't possibly sustain it's own population without overwhelming evidence. And the lack of remains. I honestly hope that load of codswall... [More]


Please Login or Register to post a comment.


  On the forums
Forum posts:
Forum topics:
Members:

5825145
263536
164300

 
Trip to the Moon could be available by 2026
12-5-2016
Moon Express is hoping to be able to send people on trips to the Moon within as little as ten years.
AI predicts the future by watching videos
12-5-2016
An artificial intelligence is learning how to anticipate what is going to happen in the next few seconds.
Virgin Galactic test flight proves a success
12-5-2016
Richard Branson's fledgling space tourism firm is back on track following a fatal crash two years ago.
Could alien life thrive on brown dwarf stars?
12-4-2016
Extrasolar planets may not be the only place where it is possible to find signs of extraterrestrial life.
Featured book
 
By Toryn Chapman
Campbell Mackenzie is a successful lawyer with occasional feelings of déjà vu. There's just one problem, though - it's not déjà vu.
Featured Videos
Gallery icon 
World's longest shout
Posted 12-5-2016 | 0 comments
Christian Kinner from Germany managed to shout for over 43 seconds non-stop.
 
Top 10 facts about James Webb Telescope
Posted 12-4-2016 | 0 comments
A look at the upcoming orbital observatory and what it will see in the depths of space.
 
Jumping widowbirds
Posted 12-3-2016 | 2 comments
These male widowbirds are competing to see which of them can jump the highest.
 
Why do we like shiny things ?
Posted 12-2-2016 | 7 comments
Why do we seem to be intrinsically drawn from an early age to shiny objects ?
 
Why are dogs so different ?
Posted 12-1-2016 | 5 comments
Despite being the same species, various breeds of dogs can be very different indeed.
 
 View: More videos
Stories & Experiences
Not my daughter
12-2-2016 | Kansas USA
 
Curious cat
12-2-2016 | Australia
 
My ball lightning story
11-12-2016 | Kane, PA
 
My doppelganger story
11-12-2016 | Levittown, PA
 
The same dream
11-12-2016 | Pennsylvania
 
Paranormal activity ?
11-4-2016 | England
 
ESP experiences
11-4-2016 | United States
 
Witnessing hyperspeed?
10-13-2016 | United States
 
Auntie doppelganger
10-13-2016 | United States
 
Men in Black encounters
10-13-2016 | Canada
 

         More stories | Send us your story
 
Top   |  Home   |   Forum   |   News   |   Image Gallery   |  Columns   |   Encyclopedia   |   Videos   |   Polls
UM-X 10.7 Unexplained-Mysteries.com 2001-2015
Privacy Policy and Disclaimer   |   Cookies   |   Advertise   |   Contact   |   Help/FAQ