Thursday, July 28, 2016
Contact us    |    Advertise    |   Help   RSS icon Twitter icon Facebook icon
    Home  ·  News  ·  Forum  ·  Stories  ·  Image Gallery  ·  Columns  ·  Encyclopedia  ·  Videos
Find: in

Dozens of Yeti hair samples DNA tested


Posted on Wednesday, 2 July, 2014 | Comment icon 182 comments

Could there still be an undiscovered primate roaming the mountains ? Image Credit: CC BY-SA 2.0 Dirk Hartung
Scientists have been analyzing samples of hair that are said to have originated from the elusive cryptid.
Oxford geneticist Bryan Sykes made headlines last year when he tested strands of alleged Yeti hairs recovered from the Himalayas and discovered that they seemed to belong to an extinct species of polar bear that lived 40,000 years ago.

Since then he has tested dozens more samples of hair thought to have originated from the cryptozoological biped as part of an ongoing project to try and solve the mystery once and for all.

His findings, which were published this week, indicate that almost all of the samples had come from cows, bears, porcupines, horses and an assortment of other mundane species. Despite this however Sykes is adamant that his research does not mean that Bigfoot can't still exist.

"I don't think this finishes the Bigfoot myth at all," he told NBC News. "What it does do is show that there is a way for Bigfoot enthusiasts to go back out into the forest and get the real thing."

The geneticist is now organizing an expedition to the Himalayas next year to seek out live specimens of the elusive polar bear species that his DNA testing had helped to identify.

"That's the next logical step," he said. "We need a live 'Yeti.'"

Source: NBC News | Comments (182)

Tags: Bigfoot, Yeti


 
Recent comments on this story
Comment icon #173 Posted by Sakari on 17 July, 2014, 2:41
Take a look at this link about a recently discovered creature 20 years ago. http://relivearth.co...ry-and-threats/. Read just this part, then see if you agree with me..... After this discovery, scientists did extensive research in the area. In next few years this research led to the discovery of 20 partial specimen of this species, including three complete skin and several photos. Researchers were also able to trap the species in remotely set camera in the rain forests. With all these evidences, scientists came to the conclusion that this is a completely new species and it was named as Saola (... [More]
Comment icon #174 Posted by DieChecker on 17 July, 2014, 2:51
The problem with finding a large mammal in a Vietnamese valley, and finding Bigfoot, is that a Bigfoot supposedly has a territory that spans an entire western state. A home range something on the order of 100,000 square miles. Where the Saola has a range of something like 1000 square miles. So it is 100 times easier to find with cameras and on foot. The only leveling factor would be how many bigfoots there are overlapping the same range. Could be 10, or 20... But unless it is 200+, you're still going to have BF being 10 to 100 times harder to find. And BF is more intelligent then an ox. Going ... [More]
Comment icon #175 Posted by Hawkin on 17 July, 2014, 2:58
Read just this part, then see if you agree with me..... Now, lets use that with Bigfoot : After this discovery, scientists did extensive research in the area............ One can argue that the first sighting was in 1811......But, lets not go that far....Lets go with this : Interest in Bigfoot began to pick up in the United States in 1958 when a bulldozer operator named Jerry Crew found enormous footprints around where he was working in Humboldt County, California. What that does not mention is those tracks were admitted to be made on purpose, to keep trespassers out.....Anyway, 1958 to 2014. 5... [More]
Comment icon #176 Posted by Sakari on 17 July, 2014, 2:58
The problem with finding a large mammal in a Vietnamese valley, and finding Bigfoot, is that a Bigfoot supposedly has a territory that spans an entire western state. A home range something on the order of 100,000 square miles. Where the Saola has a range of something like 1000 square miles. So it is 100 times easier to find with cameras and on foot. The only leveling factor would be how many bigfoots there are overlapping the same range. Could be 10, or 20... But unless it is 200+, you're still going to have BF being 10 to 100 times harder to find. And BF is more intelligent then an ox. Going ... [More]
Comment icon #177 Posted by Sakari on 17 July, 2014, 3:01
I'm not saying they exist. I'm just saying that it's a possibility they do considering that species have been rediscovered or new species have come to light. As for you saying you gave up on that fantasy. It would seem you still have an interest in it more then you realize since you visit these threads and discuss it. But that's ok. I do have an interest in it. I have said numerous times, I used to believe in it. " used to ". As I have stated, my interest is in why some people still do believe, and believe to the point of getting defensive and mad. Not saying you, saying some people. I do not ... [More]
Comment icon #178 Posted by DieChecker on 17 July, 2014, 3:18
How many people hunt, hike, work, and live in those areas of Vietnahm versus the PNW. Per capita, I would be willing to bet more people ( and guns and trail cams ) per square mile frequent the PNW, and/or live in it, work in it, hunt in it, hike in it. Perhaps. But the US has a population density of 32 people per square kilometer, while Vietnam as a population density of 268. About 10 times denser population. That would mean more hunters and more wood gatherers, and more people wandering about in my opinion (per square kilometer). http://en.wikipedia....ulation_density
Comment icon #179 Posted by Sakari on 17 July, 2014, 10:46
Perhaps. But the US has a population density of 32 people per square kilometer, while Vietnam as a population density of 268. About 10 times denser population. That would mean more hunters and more wood gatherers, and more people wandering about in my opinion (per square kilometer). http://en.wikipedia....ulation_density I'm that case. http://www.bigfootencounters.com/creatures/pj.htm
Comment icon #180 Posted by Myles on 17 July, 2014, 12:12
Or homeless people... or even hikers that want to be found. Sakari does have a point that if BF was real, we should have found some good evidence by now. But that is not a sure thing.... Someone had physical evidence of these already though. Big difference.
Comment icon #181 Posted by Rafterman on 17 July, 2014, 15:45
The problem with finding a large mammal in a Vietnamese valley, and finding Bigfoot, is that a Bigfoot supposedly has a territory that spans an entire western state. A home range something on the order of 100,000 square miles. Where the Saola has a range of something like 1000 square miles. So it is 100 times easier to find with cameras and on foot. The only leveling factor would be how many bigfoots there are overlapping the same range. Could be 10, or 20... But unless it is 200+, you're still going to have BF being 10 to 100 times harder to find. And BF is more intelligent then an ox. Going ... [More]
Comment icon #182 Posted by Thorvir Hrothgaard on 17 July, 2014, 16:11
Maybe Bigfoot is really human...inflicted with some sort of lycanthropy. His more "animal" form isn't some terrifying creature that eats humans, but more shy and careful. After the cycle is up, he returns to human form, completely forgetting his recent activites--or, alternatively, he knows exactly what is happening and takes steps to make sure he isn't found out. That would explain his sightings throughout the world, even though it's sparse enough that it couldn't possibly sustain it's own population without overwhelming evidence. And the lack of remains. I honestly hope that load of codswall... [More]


Please Login or Register to post a comment.


  On the forums
Forum posts:
Forum topics:
Members:

5732238
260035
161453

 
Philae mission officially comes to a close
7-27-2016
After a year without communication, scientists have finally said goodbye to Philae for the last time.
This year's global warming is off the charts
7-27-2016
Climate scientists have expressed concern over the record-breaking temperatures seen so far this year.
White whale Migaloo spotted near Queensland
7-27-2016
Migaloo, one of only four known white humpbacks in existence, has surfaced once again near Australia.
Mystery surrounds missing craters on Ceres
7-26-2016
Scientists have been attempting to determine why the dwarf planet Ceres has no large craters at all.
Featured Videos
Gallery icon 
Following the Oregon Trail
Posted 7-27-2016 | 1 comment
A look back at Narcissa Whitman - the first woman to complete the Oregon Trail.
 
Walking over light bulbs
Posted 7-26-2016 | 2 comments
This skilled Chinese woman succeeds in walking across light bulbs for 20 meters.
 
Are great leaders born or made ?
Posted 7-25-2016 | 7 comments
What does it take to be a great leader and how does one go about accomplishing that ?
 
Real-life Pokemon
Posted 7-24-2016 | 1 comment
Are there any animals in the real world that could be considered actual real-life Pokemon ?
 
Trans-Atlantic solar powered flight
Posted 7-23-2016 | 0 comments
A look at Solar Impulse 2, the aircraft that crossed the Atlantic using the power of the sun.
 
 View: More videos
Stories & Experiences
Light in Orion
7-23-2016 | Tampa, Florida
 
Girl with the broken neck
7-23-2016 | Mississippi
 
Holes in cotton clothing
7-23-2016 | Somerset, UK
 
Three knocks in the night
6-28-2016 | Cedar City, Utah
 
Mr Button and laurel leaves
6-28-2016 | Unknown
 
Knocking on the door
6-28-2016 | Virginia, United States
 
Not in our jurisdiction
5-2-2016 | California, United States
 
Zippers and headlights
5-2-2016 | Raleigh, United States
 
Spinning, voiceless and breathless
5-2-2016 | Garland, Texas
 
Paralyzed
4-15-2016 | United States
 

         More stories | Send us your story
 
Top   |  Home   |   Forum   |   News   |   Image Gallery   |  Columns   |   Encyclopedia   |   Videos   |   Polls
UM-X 10.7 Unexplained-Mysteries.com © 2001-2015
Privacy Policy and Disclaimer   |   Cookies   |   Advertise   |   Contact   |   Help/FAQ