Wednesday, July 30, 2014   |   4,727 users online
Contact us    |    Advertise    |   Help   RSS icon Twitter icon Facebook icon
    Home  ·  News  ·  Forum  ·  Stories  ·  Image Gallery  ·  Columns  ·  Encyclopedia  ·  Videos  ·  Chat
Find: in

Are two heads really better than one ?

Posted on Saturday, 21 April, 2012 | Comment icon 9 comments | News tip by: Still Waters

Image credit:

New research suggests that people may be better off answering difficult questions by themselves.

To analyse the difference in performance between individuals thinking on their own and those who discussed things as a group, Professor Asher Koriat conducted a set of studies in which he asked a series of questions to participants. The results suggested that those who worked together in a group produced better answers when the solution was logical, but those working on their own produced better responses when confronted with a trick question. Professor Koriat concluded that people had more confidence in their own answer when working alone than when in a group.

"A study by scientists found that individuals could be better at problem solving on their own, as long as they were confident in their own answers."

  View: Full article |  Source: Telegraph

  Discuss: View comments (9)


Recent comments on this story
Comment icon #1 Posted by DeltaEcho on 21 April, 2012, 14:22
I think this is more of something that depends on the person involved. To me, it seems more likely that some people work/think better on their own, while others would be better in a group.
Comment icon #2 Posted by pestilent1 on 21 April, 2012, 16:46
Did you come up with that on your own? ;-)
Comment icon #3 Posted by PsiSeeker on 21 April, 2012, 17:08
"A study by scientists found that individuals could be better at problem solving on their own, as long as they were confident in their own answers." When they attempted to answer in groups, those who offered the right answer tended to be drowned out by more confident members who confused them or led them astray, the research found. Humans are conformist... It's only logical to assume that when the wrong answer is offered by a populace that is wrong, on average, then the result will be wrong, on average, regardless of the smaller percentage which hold the correct answer. The... [More]
Comment icon #4 Posted by Oen Anderson on 22 April, 2012, 4:08
At a seminar one time the speaker said synergy is like if you have an idea and I have an idea we each only have one idea. But if we share our ideas we each now have two ideas. I spoke up and said, "Yes, we have your bad idea and my good idea, I think I'll keep my idea to myself thank you."
Comment icon #5 Posted by angi chiesa on 22 April, 2012, 6:17
Ok give me a difficult question to solve. Actually I believe that two heads are better than.A problem shared is a problem halved. So prof Asher gets his 10 minutes of glory spouting out so much nonsense.We get a lot of useless theories on unexplained - mysteries. Well at least I find them amusing.
Comment icon #6 Posted by jgorman628 on 27 May, 2012, 19:31
Two heads are great but one head generally is much more decisive. If you don't truly believe in what you're doing you will not put as much effort into it. Doesn't play well with others.
Comment icon #7 Posted by WilliamW on 28 May, 2012, 0:16
Comment icon #8 Posted by Lookitisoneofthosepeople on 30 May, 2012, 13:15
Cash Cab! You have to love when the person with the right answer is steered away by others to a wrong answer and they lose lol. I do like seeing people win though. Maybe because I think it could be me. So let me get this right, the person who has the right answer but is unconfident will get drowned out by those with the wrong answer but who have more confidence? So is confidence the key to success or what? It seems to help with everything else, having people tell you yes, getting dates, clearing that hurdle you cannot see, etc...
Comment icon #9 Posted by keninsc on 30 May, 2012, 13:57
There's an old adage in engineering circles, "You know what an elephant is? It's a mouse designed by a committee." You simply don't get the great leaps forward in technology because too many people will want to play it safe and new designs require risk and the ability to accept the negative consequences when it doesn't work out the way you thought it might.

Please Login or Register to post a comment.

Other news in this category
Woman starts speaking in past-life language
Posted 7-25-2014 | 22 comments
A woman in India suddenly started speaking in a form of Bengali that was used over 150 years ago....
Waiter predicts 1M lottery win in a dream
Posted 7-15-2014 | 18 comments
A restaurant owner is being forced to share his winnings with a waiter who predicted that he would win....
California drought sees dowsers in demand
Posted 7-12-2014 | 68 comments
Dowsers have been seeing a lot of work lately thanks to a third consecutive year of drought....
Scientist investigates phone call telepathy
Posted 7-1-2014 | 18 comments
Dr. Rupert Sheldrake conducted a study to see if we really can tell who is calling before picking up....
Can we slow down our perception of time ?
Posted 6-30-2014 | 27 comments
A man who had suffered an aneurysm discovered that he was perceiving the world as if time had stopped....
Humans share dozens of universal emotions
Posted 6-27-2014 | 12 comments
There are at least 30 facial expressions for emotions that can be recognized anywhere in the world....
UK is home to subculture of 15,000 vampires
Posted 5-30-2014 | 118 comments
A psychology lecturer is carrying out the first ever online academic study in to the lives of vampires....
Scientists learn how to induce lucid dreaming
Posted 5-14-2014 | 34 comments
Influencing the brain through electric scalp stimulation can allow a person to control their own dreams....
Why do we see faces where none exist ?
Posted 5-10-2014 | 29 comments
Pareidolia is a phenomenon that can make us see faces and other meaningful shapes in abstract patterns....
Do our thoughts exist in the physical world ?
Posted 5-9-2014 | 114 comments
Philosophers have pondered for thousands of years over the very nature of human consciousness....

 View: More news in this category
Top   |  Home   |   Forum   |   News   |   Image Gallery   |  Columns   |   Encyclopedia   |   Videos   |   Polls
UM-X 10.6 2001-2014
Privacy Policy and Disclaimer   |   Cookies   |   Advertise   |   Contact   |   Help/FAQ