Thursday, October 23, 2014   |   4,632 users online
Contact us    |    Advertise    |   Help   RSS icon Twitter icon Facebook icon
    Home  ·  News  ·  Forum  ·  Stories  ·  Image Gallery  ·  Columns  ·  Encyclopedia  ·  Videos  ·  Chat
Find: in

Was Queen Nefertiti King Tutís mother ?


Posted on Thursday, 14 February, 2013 | Comment icon 19 comments | News tip by: Still Waters


Image credit: Jon Bodsworth

 
A DNA analysis by French archaeologist Marc Gabolde suggests a new link between Nefertiti and King Tut.

CT scans and genetic analyses revealed as far back as 2005 that Tutankhamun was likely to be the offspring of Akhenaten and his unnamed sister. King Tut's congenital malformations such as a clubbed foot and curved spine further added weight to his incestuous origins. Archaeologist Marc Gabolde however has a different idea - he believes that Tutankhamun's mother might have actually been his father's first cousin, Queen Nefertiti.

"The DNA of the third generation between cousins looks like the DNA between a brother and sister," he said. "I believe that Tutankhamun is the son of Akhenaten and Nefertiti, but that Akhenaten and Nefertiti were cousins."

"A genetic investigation by French archaeologist Marc Gabolde is threatening to rewrite the history books on two of ancient Egypt's most iconic figures."

  View: Full article |  Source: io9.com

  Discuss: View comments (19)

   


 
Recent comments on this story
Comment icon #10 Posted by glorybebe on 14 February, 2013, 19:19
Ah! Gotcha!
Comment icon #11 Posted by cormac mac airt on 14 February, 2013, 19:31
And just to throw this out there, there have been two possibilities presented for Nefertiti in the original JAMA report. One is KV35 YL and the other, KV35 EL. In neither case do the microsatellites match sufficiently for either lady to be a full sister of Akhenaten. Which means that if either lady really was Nefertiti then she definitely wasn't Tutankhamun's mother. ng to the Tutankhamun Kindred.gif] cormac
Comment icon #12 Posted by Everdred on 14 February, 2013, 20:39
What makes you say that? Looks like a perfect match to me. Both KV55 and KV35YL have alleles from their putative parents (KV35EL and Amenhotep III) at every locus.
Comment icon #13 Posted by Atentutankh-pasheri on 14 February, 2013, 20:43
You could well have been reading about this since 1925 let alone 1995. What has breathed new life into this ancient and contentious nonsense is the DNA testing done in 2010.
Comment icon #14 Posted by cormac mac airt on 14 February, 2013, 21:54
Your right. Got a bit ahead of myself with two different trains of thought. The whole "first cousin/full sister" bit threw me off. What I should have said was that if KV35 Elder Lady was Nefertiti, then there is no way she was Tutankhamun's mother*. And there is no extant information from Ancient Egypt on Nefertiti's parentage**, to make her a biological sister of Akhenaten, so Gabolde is attempting to pidgeon-hole her into the genetic lineage based on nothing. So it's basically wishful thinking on his part. * Although KV35 EL may have been Queen Tiye. ** Although so... [More]
Comment icon #15 Posted by kmt_sesh on 17 February, 2013, 5:01
I agree with cormac. It's too bad this discussion has already grown quiet and I regret not having had the time to weigh in until tonight, but [background=rgb(245, 249, 253)]Marc Gabolde's conclusions are a bit of a stretch, to say the least. As cormac noted, nothing certain is known of Nefertiti's parentage, so suddenly placing her as a first cousin of Akhenaten seems decidedly odd to me. In the first place there is not much evidence for how cousins came into play in the royal families at any point in dynastic history, aside possibly from some muddled periods when there was royal i... [More]
Comment icon #16 Posted by teetay08 on 1 March, 2013, 16:33
thats just alot of incest
Comment icon #17 Posted by Atentutankh-pasheri on 1 March, 2013, 16:57
Disturbing actually, and I wonder if any, or how many, AE royalty had a brother who was also their father. It's always possible that some DNA results are not released because they are just too shocking.... Anyway, having six fingers on each hand makes for really fast typing
Comment icon #18 Posted by kmt_sesh on 2 March, 2013, 3:29
Pity the ancient royals had no typewriters, then. Listen to me—"typewriters." Now I'm dating myself. Let's change that to computer keyboards. But as far as that goes, at least the old-fashioned typewriters didn't require electricity, so the ancient royals with their dozen fingers are screwed on all counts. What DNA results would be too shocking? Thanks to DNA analysis we know now Tut's parents were a brother and sister, and the "icky" factor doesn't get much worse than that. Besides which, most modern folk love to hear about all of the ickines... [More]
Comment icon #19 Posted by Atentutankh-pasheri on 2 March, 2013, 9:20
Ah, about shocking, I was thinking about a well know Americanism that is slightly worse than brother/sister


Please Login or Register to post a comment.


Other news in this category
Mary Rose dog turns out to be male
Posted 10-20-2014 | 4 comments
The ship's dog aboard the doomed vessel that sank 500 years ago has undergone DNA testing....
 
Ancient cult complex unearthed in Israel
Posted 10-15-2014 | 3 comments
Archaeologists have discovered the long lost ruins of a huge cult complex at the site of Tel Burna....
 
Viking treasure hoard found in Scotland
Posted 10-13-2014 | 16 comments
A huge haul of valuable Viking artefacts has been discovered in a field by a man with a metal detector....
 
Further treasures found in Antikythera wreck
Posted 10-10-2014 | 10 comments
Divers have discovered valuable artefacts hidden within the same wreck as the Antikythera Mechanism....
 
Indonesia rock art dates back 40,000 years
Posted 10-9-2014 | 4 comments
Ancient cave drawings found in Indonesia show that early Europeans weren't the only ones creating art....
 
'Beardless Jesus' discovered in Spain
Posted 10-6-2014 | 18 comments
One of the earliest depictions of Jesus has been found on a plate dating back to the 4th century AD....
 
Dracula's dungeon discovered in Turkey
Posted 9-29-2014 | 17 comments
The dungeon in which Vlad the Impaler was imprisoned by the Turks has been found at Tokat Castle....
 
New 'Nazca lines' discovered in Kazakhstan
Posted 9-25-2014 | 96 comments
More than 50 previously unknown geoglyphs have been found sprawled across the north of the country....
 
'Second Stonehenge' discovered in England
Posted 9-10-2014 | 16 comments
A Neolithic site consisting of 50 large stone blocks has been found two miles north-east of Stonehenge....
 
Viking ring fortress discovered in Denmark
Posted 9-8-2014 | 26 comments
An impressive ring-shaped fortress has been unearthed on an island 50km south of Copenhagen....
 
Ancient treasure found in Nile cemetery
Posted 9-2-2014 | 5 comments
Archaeologists excavating several 2,000-year-old tombs have discovered a host of valuable artifacts....
 

 View: More news in this category
 
Top   |  Home   |   Forum   |   News   |   Image Gallery   |  Columns   |   Encyclopedia   |   Videos   |   Polls
UM-X 10.6 Unexplained-Mysteries.com © 2001-2014
Privacy Policy and Disclaimer   |   Cookies   |   Advertise   |   Contact   |   Help/FAQ