Thursday, February 23, 2017
Contact us    |    Advertise    |   Help   RSS icon Twitter icon Facebook icon
    Home  ·  News  ·  Forum  ·  Stories  ·  Image Gallery  ·  Columns  ·  Encyclopedia  ·  Videos
Find: in

Was Queen Nefertiti King Tutís mother ?


Posted on Thursday, 14 February, 2013 | Comment icon 19 comments | News tip by: Still Waters


Image credit: Jon Bodsworth

 
A DNA analysis by French archaeologist Marc Gabolde suggests a new link between Nefertiti and King Tut.

CT scans and genetic analyses revealed as far back as 2005 that Tutankhamun was likely to be the offspring of Akhenaten and his unnamed sister. King Tut's congenital malformations such as a clubbed foot and curved spine further added weight to his incestuous origins. Archaeologist Marc Gabolde however has a different idea - he believes that Tutankhamun's mother might have actually been his father's first cousin, Queen Nefertiti.

"The DNA of the third generation between cousins looks like the DNA between a brother and sister," he said. "I believe that Tutankhamun is the son of Akhenaten and Nefertiti, but that Akhenaten and Nefertiti were cousins."

"A genetic investigation by French archaeologist Marc Gabolde is threatening to rewrite the history books on two of ancient Egypt's most iconic figures."

  View: Full article |  Source: io9.com

  Discuss: View comments (19)

   


 
Recent comments on this story
Comment icon #10 Posted by glorybebe on 14 February, 2013, 19:19
But the parents of Tutankhamum were brother and sister according to the DNA analysis and such analyses can determine the difference between a cousin and a sibling. cormac Ah! Gotcha!
Comment icon #11 Posted by cormac mac airt on 14 February, 2013, 19:31
Ah! Gotcha! And just to throw this out there, there have been two possibilities presented for Nefertiti in the original JAMA report. One is KV35 YL and the other, KV35 EL. In neither case do the microsatellites match sufficiently for either lady to be a full sister of Akhenaten. Which means that if either lady really was Nefertiti then she definitely wasn't Tutankhamun's mother. cormac
Comment icon #12 Posted by Everdred on 14 February, 2013, 20:39
And just to throw this out there, there have been two possibilities presented for Nefertiti in the original JAMA report. One is KV35 YL and the other, KV35 EL. In neither case do the microsatellites match sufficiently for either lady to be a full sister of Akhenaten. Which means that if either lady really was Nefertiti then she definitely wasn't Tutankhamun's mother. cormac What makes you say that? Looks like a perfect match to me. Both KV55 and KV35YL have alleles from their putative parents (KV35EL and Amenhotep III) at every locus.
Comment icon #13 Posted by Atentutankh-pasheri on 14 February, 2013, 20:43
Err is this new?, I am sure I read about this way back in 1995 or the postulation of it. You could well have been reading about this since 1925 let alone 1995. What has breathed new life into this ancient and contentious nonsense is the DNA testing done in 2010.
Comment icon #14 Posted by cormac mac airt on 14 February, 2013, 21:54
What makes you say that? Looks like a perfect match to me. Both KV55 and KV35YL have alleles from their putative parents (KV35EL and Amenhotep III) at every locus. Your right. Got a bit ahead of myself with two different trains of thought. The whole "first cousin/full sister" bit threw me off. What I should have said was that if KV35 Elder Lady was Nefertiti, then there is no way she was Tutankhamun's mother*. And there is no extant information from Ancient Egypt on Nefertiti's parentage**, to make her a biological sister of Akhenaten, so Gabolde is attempting to pidgeon-hole her into the gene... [More]
Comment icon #15 Posted by kmt_sesh on 17 February, 2013, 5:01
I agree with cormac. It's too bad this discussion has already grown quiet and I regret not having had the time to weigh in until tonight, but Marc Gabolde's conclusions are a bit of a stretch, to say the least. As cormac noted, nothing certain is known of Nefertiti's parentage, so suddenly placing her as a first cousin of Akhenaten seems decidedly odd to me. In the first place there is not much evidence for how cousins came into play in the royal families at any point in dynastic history, aside possibly from some muddled periods when there was royal infighting such as at the end of Dynasty 19 ... [More]
Comment icon #16 Posted by teetay08 on 1 March, 2013, 16:33
thats just alot of incest
Comment icon #17 Posted by Atentutankh-pasheri on 1 March, 2013, 16:57
Disturbing actually, and I wonder if any, or how many, AE royalty had a brother who was also their father. It's always possible that some DNA results are not released because they are just too shocking.... Anyway, having six fingers on each hand makes for really fast typing
Comment icon #18 Posted by kmt_sesh on 2 March, 2013, 3:29
Disturbing actually, and I wonder if any, or how many, AE royalty had a brother who was also their father. It's always possible that some DNA results are not released because they are just too shocking.... Anyway, having six fingers on each hand makes for really fast typing Pity the ancient royals had no typewriters, then. Listen to meó"typewriters." Now I'm dating myself. Let's change that to computer keyboards. But as far as that goes, at least the old-fashioned typewriters didn't require electricity, so the ancient royals with their dozen fingers are screwed on all counts. What DNA results ... [More]
Comment icon #19 Posted by Atentutankh-pasheri on 2 March, 2013, 9:20
Pity the ancient royals had no typewriters, then. Listen to meó"typewriters." Now I'm dating myself. Let's change that to computer keyboards. But as far as that goes, at least the old-fashioned typewriters didn't require electricity, so the ancient royals with their dozen fingers are screwed on all counts. What DNA results would be too shocking? Thanks to DNA analysis we know now Tut's parents were a brother and sister, and the "icky" factor doesn't get much worse than that. Besides which, most modern folk love to hear about all of the ickiness ancient people were capable of. Humans have becom... [More]


Please Login or Register to post a comment.


  On the forums
Forum posts:
Forum topics:
Members:

5888721
265782
165722

 
Prehistoric worm with huge jaws discovered
2-23-2017
Scientists have identified a previously unknown species of primordial giant worm with huge snapping jaws.
7 Earth-sized worlds found around nearby star
2-22-2017
NASA has announced the discovery of seven new planets including three within their star's habitable zone.
Scientists finally solve 'ketchup problem'
2-22-2017
It's a question that has puzzled mankind for years - how do you get every drop of sauce out of the bottle?
Amazing 'fire rainbow' spotted over Singapore
2-22-2017
The breathtaking natural phenomenon was photographed by dozens of people on Monday afternoon.
Other news in this category
New Dead Sea Scrolls cave found in Israel
Posted 2-9-2017 | 5 comments
The cave, though previously looted of its scrolls, is the first to be discovered in more than 60 years....
 
Mysterious earthworks found in the Amazon
Posted 2-7-2017 | 13 comments
More than 450 large geometrical geoglyphs have been discovered in areas cleared by deforestation....
 
James Cameron finds 'evidence of Atlantis'
Posted 2-1-2017 | 574 comments
The famed movie director has linked the discovery of bronze age anchors to the legend of Atlantis....
 
Lost kingdom of Rheged found in Scotland
Posted 1-20-2017 | 7 comments
Archaeologists believe that they have located the site of a lost kingdom dating back to the Dark Ages....
 
Hidden wall discovered near Egyptian city
Posted 12-26-2016 | 3 comments
Archaeologists have unveiled a hidden wall that may indicate the presence of nearby pharaonic tombs....
 
Evidence of prehistoric plant cooking found
Posted 12-20-2016 | 3 comments
Researchers at the University of Bristol have found cooking pot fragments dating back over 10,000 years....
 
Mystery surrounds Amazon's 'Stonehenge'
Posted 12-16-2016 | 14 comments
An ancient civilization is believed to have built standing stones in the rainforest over 1,000 years ago....
 
Face of Robert the Bruce has been revealed
Posted 12-10-2016 | 29 comments
Scientists have put together a reconstruction of what the famous Scottish king would have looked like....
 
7,000-year-old lost city unearthed in Egypt
Posted 11-26-2016 | 8 comments
Archaeologists have discovered the remains of an ancient city and graveyard at Abydos in southern Egypt....
 
Ancient Egyptian mummy unearthed near Luxor
Posted 11-14-2016 | 13 comments
Discovered in a tomb by Spanish archaeologists, the well-preserved mummy dates back over 3,000 years....
 
Did the ancient Scots eat roasted rodents ?
Posted 10-22-2016 | 24 comments
Forget haggis - Neolithic Scots living on the islands may have once had an appetite for the humble vole....
 

 View: More news in this category
 
Top   |  Home   |   Forum   |   News   |   Image Gallery   |  Columns   |   Encyclopedia   |   Videos   |   Polls
UM-X 10.7 Unexplained-Mysteries.com © 2001-2017
Privacy Policy and Disclaimer   |   Cookies   |   Advertise   |   Contact   |   Help/FAQ