Thursday, November 23, 2017
Contact us    |    Advertise    |   Help   RSS icon Twitter icon Facebook icon
    Home  ·  News  ·  Forum  ·  Stories  ·  Image Gallery  ·  Columns  ·  Encyclopedia  ·  Videos
Find: in
This news story is archived which means that, while it is still available to view, the information contained within may be outdated and the original source site/link may no longer be viewable.

For the most recent stories, please visit either the site's home page or main news section.

Did the Neanderthals fail to hunt rabbits ?

Posted on Sunday, 3 March, 2013 | Comment icon 38 comments | News tip by: Still Waters


Image credit: CC 3.0 Masteruk

 
A new theory suggests that an inability to catch rabbits for food may have hastened their extinction.

Neanderthals were known to have hunted a variety of animals, in particular large mammals such as deer and even mammoths. When some of these species started to disappear our human ancestors enjoyed success switching to hunting for smaller mammals such as rabbits, but evidence retrieved from caves suggests that the Neanderthals may have struggled to keep up.

The remains of larger animals have been discovered in abundance dating back up to 30,000 years, but after the Neanderthals disappeared this seemed to change to a greater abundance of rabbit remains. Could it be that an inability to adapt to smaller prey was a contributing factor in their eventual extinction ?

"It's not clear why Neanderthals would have had more trouble changing prey, says Fa."

  View: Full article

 Source: New Scientist


  Discuss: View comments (38)

   


 
Recent comments on this story
Comment icon #29 Posted by Frank Merton on 4 March, 2013, 13:30
Any killing of anything, for food or otherwise, is wrong. It is just that starving yourself is also wrong. There are big wrongs and small wrongs and in-between wrongs, and we all have to make our decisions. I am not a vegetarian. I eat fish and poultry and a few other more bizarre things, but most of my diet is vegetarian. Do I think it is wrong for others to eat meat? Well, yes, but cutting off a bit of asparagus is also killing, and therefore wrong, but, as things go, not a very bad wrong. It is even better if the animal as a result lives better than if it weren't our prey -- either because ... [More]
Comment icon #30 Posted by CrimsonKing on 4 March, 2013, 13:32
Any killing of anything, for food or otherwise, is wrong. It is just that starving yourself is also wrong. There are big wrongs and small wrongs and in-between wrongs, and we all have to make our decisions. I am not a vegetarian. I eat fish and poultry and a few other more bizarre things, but most of my diet is vegetarian. Do I think it is wrong for others to eat meat? Well, yes, but cutting off a bit of asparagus is also killing, and therefore wrong, but, as things go, not a very bad wrong. It is even better if the animal as a result lives better than if it weren't our prey -- either because ... [More]
Comment icon #31 Posted by Junior Chubb on 4 March, 2013, 13:34
There are big wrongs and small wrongs and in-between wrongs, and we all have to make our decisions. Westerners have this stupid idea of sin -- if something is wrong it is as sin and all sin is condemned. This is an absurd notion. Wrongs come in a scale of wrongness -- lying is wrong but so is telling the truth if it hurts someone. I would guess you are a Westerner then. In reality there are no rights, wrongs or sins just life and death...
Comment icon #32 Posted by CrimsonKing on 4 March, 2013, 13:40
I would guess you are a Westerner then. In reality there are no rights, wrongs or sins just life and death... Even better said chubb hahaha
Comment icon #33 Posted by Frank Merton on 4 March, 2013, 13:41
I would guess you are a Westerner then. In reality there are no rights, wrongs or sins just life and death... Not quite, although I suspect close to it. I think there are rights and wrongs. This is a notion that no doubt I was taught very young with a switch but I have both religious and philosophical reasons for retaining the idea. I just don't buy "sin." That is an offense against God, and since I'm an atheist I don't believe in that kind of divine legislation.Something is wrong basically if it harms. Now many things both harm and do good, which is why there are degrees of harm. The Buddha (... [More]
Comment icon #34 Posted by CrimsonKing on 4 March, 2013, 13:42
i just had 3 eggs,and venison tenderloin for breakfast.I just sinned like crazy,felt and tasted good though so i guess it was worth it
Comment icon #35 Posted by Junior Chubb on 4 March, 2013, 14:00
This is a notion that no doubt I was taught very young This is where your perception of right or wrong comes from, we all have different (though often similar) perceptions of right and wrong though in reality there is no such thing, there is just survival and what has to be done to survive. Luckily we live in a world where we can justify what is 'right' or what is 'wrong'. I just don't buy "sin." That is an offense against God, and since I'm an atheist I don't believe in that kind of divine legislation. I see where you are coming from with this, but again it is all point of view, for me saying... [More]
Comment icon #36 Posted by Frank Merton on 4 March, 2013, 14:07
We have a perception of right and wrong that we were indoctrinated as children, and we all automatically assume this is the proper basis for behavior. It is called our conscience. It is a reasonably good guide, but we have to remember that it is a cultural artifact, not a rational one. So we really need a rational guide to help us assess what our conscience tells us. In the West some complicated combination of utilitarianism and Kant seems to work. For me the concept of compassion is the best guide. Whether or not good and bad are absolutes in the frame of things is problematic, but we can alw... [More]
Comment icon #37 Posted by Junior Chubb on 4 March, 2013, 14:40
but we can always ask ourselves, does this do good or harm, and how much, and try to decide how to proceed from that. That's always a good way to proceed (and how I like to think I appoach situations), but again yields varyingly wild results depending on the individual. For me the way to proceed from here would be to wish you a good day...
Comment icon #38 Posted by Silver Surfer on 10 March, 2013, 9:11
Any killing of anything, for food or otherwise, is wrong. It is just that starving yourself is also wrong. There are big wrongs and small wrongs and in-between wrongs, and we all have to make our decisions. I am not a vegetarian. I eat fish and poultry and a few other more bizarre things, but most of my diet is vegetarian. Do I think it is wrong for others to eat meat? Well, yes, but cutting off a bit of asparagus is also killing, and therefore wrong, but, as things go, not a very bad wrong. It is even better if the animal as a result lives better than if it weren't our prey -- either because ... [More]


Please Login or Register to post a comment.


  On the forums
Forum posts:
Forum topics:
Members:

6036953
259264
171241

 
NASA reveals Cassini 'farewell Saturn' image
11-22-2017
A breathtaking mosaic of the iconic ringed gas giant has been put together by the Cassini mission team.
Mature white crocodile sighted in Australia
11-22-2017
Nicknamed Pearl, the reptile was seen swimming around in the Adelaide River near Darwin on Sunday.
Flat-Earther to launch himself in a rocket
11-22-2017
Self-taught rocket scientist 'Mad' Mike Hughes is hoping to reach 1,800ft in his own steam-powered rocket.
Entire family of mammoths goes on sale
11-21-2017
The skeletons, which include a one-year-old baby, were discovered by builders in Siberia 15 years ago.
Other news in this category
Entire family of mammoths goes on sale
Posted 11-21-2017 | 5 comments
The skeletons, which include a one-year-old baby, were discovered by builders in Siberia 15 years ago....
 
Prehistoric forest fossils predate dinosaurs
Posted 11-13-2017 | 2 comments
Scientists exploring Antarctica have found fossils from a forest dating back over 260 million years....
 
Prehistoric shark found off coast of Portugal
Posted 11-12-2017 | 11 comments
Considered to be a 'living fossil', the frilled shark has remained unchanged for over 80 million years....
 
Huge prehistoric otter was the size of a wolf
Posted 11-10-2017 | 8 comments
The remarkable species, which once roamed what is now China, had a bite comparable to that of a bear....
 
Dino-killing asteroid hit worst possible place
Posted 11-9-2017 | 8 comments
The dinosaurs may not have gone extinct if the asteroid had hit almost anywhere other than where it did....
 
Did T. rex use its tiny arms to slash prey ?
Posted 11-5-2017 | 16 comments
One palaeontologist has suggested that Tyrannosaurus rex may have used its arms as vicious weapons....
 
Fossil ichthyosaur found alongside its prey
Posted 10-31-2017 | 2 comments
Palaeontologists have unearthed the fossil remains of an 18ft sea monster dating back to the Jurassic Era....
 
'Mega-carnivore' dinosaur found in Africa
Posted 10-26-2017 | 2 comments
An enormous meat-eating dinosaur measuring up to 30ft in length once roamed what is now Southern Africa....
 
Near-complete tyrannosaur fossil found in Utah
Posted 10-22-2017 | 20 comments
Palaeontologists have unearthed the skeleton of a meat-eating dinosaur dating back over 76 million years....
 
9.7 million-year-old hominin teeth discovered
Posted 10-20-2017 | 22 comments
The surprising find has the potential to completely rewrite everything we know of early human history....
 
48 million-year-old bird fossil unearthed
Posted 10-18-2017 | 2 comments
A prehistoric species of bird that preened itself like a flamingo has been discovered in Germany....
 

 View: More news in this category
 
Top   |  Home   |   Forum   |   News   |   Image Gallery   |  Columns   |   Encyclopedia   |   Videos   |   Polls
UM-X 10.7 Unexplained-Mysteries.com © 2001-2017
Privacy Policy and Disclaimer   |   Cookies   |   Advertise   |   Contact   |   Help/FAQ