Tuesday, June 27, 2017
Contact us    |    Advertise    |   Help   RSS icon Twitter icon Facebook icon
    Home  ·  News  ·  Forum  ·  Stories  ·  Image Gallery  ·  Columns  ·  Encyclopedia  ·  Videos
Find: in
This news story is archived which means that, while it is still available to view, the information contained within may be outdated and the original source site/link may no longer be viewable.

For the most recent stories, please visit either the site's home page or main news section.

Huge spikes of ice threaten Europa landing

Posted on Saturday, 23 March, 2013 | Comment icon 19 comments | News tip by: seeder


Image credit: CC 3.0 Mark Sanderson

 
A future Europa mission may need to contend with deadly jagged ice spikes littering the surface.

Jupiter's icy moon is a strong contender for a future space mission due to the possibility that it hides a vast ocean of liquid water. Sending a spacecraft to Europa and landing on the surface is a difficult proposition in itself, but now scientists have pointed out that huge spikes of ice known as 'penitentes' may pose a deadly hazard to any probe attempting to touch down. Similar ice spikes can be found on Earth in high altitude regions such as the Andes.

Penitentes form when irregularities in the snow are enhanced by the energy from the Sun, creating deep furrows. The debate is on over whether similar conditions could exist on Europa. "The Sun is always coming down straight from above on Europa," said Dr Daniel Hobley. "From our point of view, if the surface of Europa is subliming - if it is being sculpted by the sunlight - it will form these features."

"Jupiter's icy moon Europa is a prime target for future space missions as it harbours a buried ocean that could have the right conditions for life."

  View: Full article

 Source: BBC News


  Discuss: View comments (19)

   


 
Recent comments on this story
Comment icon #10 Posted by psyche101 on 26 March, 2013, 9:23
Do we need to "land" as such? Could we send something with a strong shield in at high speed and bury it in the ice seeming as we need to get through quite a few kilometers of Ice already?
Comment icon #11 Posted by seeder on 28 March, 2013, 18:12
Do we need to "land" as such? Could we send something with a strong shield in at high speed and bury it in the ice seeming as we need to get through quite a few kilometers of Ice already? I think that fact alone will make it a very difficult task. When the Russians drilled lake Vostok, well they used drills! 20 years drilling for for 40 liters of juice! http://www.dailymail...Antarctica.html So we need something that can get in lots quicker...obviously perhaps! Now for a vid, and despite the title its nothing to do with the AA crowd! 'Aliens of the Deep & Mission to Europa' quote: "Whereve... [More]
Comment icon #12 Posted by Waspie_Dwarf on 28 March, 2013, 18:25
Do we need to "land" as such? Absolutely yes we do. There is no point sending a probe through the ice into the ocean below if it can not transmit its findings back to Earth. That is going to require a transmitter on the surface to relay the signals either to an orbiter and then on to Earth or directly back to Earth.
Comment icon #13 Posted by CrimsonKing on 28 March, 2013, 18:40
What do you think would be the best way of getting through the ice waspie?Heat,crash through,drill?Do we have any idea if the cracks in the ice are much thinner than the rest or is it about the same thickness?
Comment icon #14 Posted by Waspie_Dwarf on 28 March, 2013, 18:55
What do you think would be the best way of getting through the ice waspie?Heat,crash through,drill?Do we have any idea if the cracks in the ice are much thinner than the rest or is it about the same thickness? To be honest I don't know. I suspect that the ice will be too thick to crash through. Some of the proposals for melting through the ice look promising, but the only exist on paper at the moment. I suspect that, unless we find some very thin ice, drilling is going to be out of the question. The weight of the boring equipment would be prohibitive. Besides if we do find thin ice. I think wh... [More]
Comment icon #15 Posted by CrimsonKing on 28 March, 2013, 19:04
To be honest I don't know. I suspect that the ice will be too thick to crash through. Some of the proposals for melting through the ice look promising, but the only exist on paper at the moment. I suspect that, unless we find some very thin ice, drilling is going to be out of the question. The weight of the boring equipment would be prohibitive. Besides if we do find thin ice. I think what this topic is really highlighting is the need for orbiter missions first, to map Europa's surface in enough detail that lnding missions can be planned an carried out with a high probability of success. NASA ... [More]
Comment icon #16 Posted by Waspie_Dwarf on 28 March, 2013, 19:11
Do you think the radiation or magnetic field from jupiter might make things harder?Im no expert on the issue but some things i have read in the past almost make sending anything electronic their impossible. It doesn't make things easy, but the Galileo probe survived nearly 8 years in orbit around Jupiter, so it is well within our abilities.
Comment icon #17 Posted by seeder on 28 March, 2013, 19:22
Going back to the Op, it says: "Scientists would like to send a lander down to sample surface regions where water wells up through the icy crust. These areas could allow a robotic probe to sample a proxy for ocean water that lies several kilometres deep". http://www.bbc.co.uk...onment-21341176 I guess if it does well up, and we will only know from fly-bys or orbital probes/satellites etc, that there is a small chance we could just do a scoop and analyze it. But its a big IF I can appreciate typos .
Comment icon #18 Posted by Artaxerxes on 8 April, 2013, 18:24
A thermonuclear device that goes into meltdown when it hits the surface and melts it's way to the water below.
Comment icon #19 Posted by Waspie_Dwarf on 8 April, 2013, 18:36
A thermonuclear device that goes into meltdown when it hits the surface and melts it's way to the water below. Ignoring the fact that nuclear weapons in space are banned by international law. You would send a scientific mission to another world, but nuke the surface first? Do you not think that totally annihilating the very environment you want to explore BEFORE you even land might just reduce the scientific returns of the mission to zero? Would this not make the entire mission pointless? Here's an idea, map the surface and land where there are no ice blades?


Please Login or Register to post a comment.


  On the forums
Georgia police officers stop speeding 'alien'
6-27-2017
When the cops pulled over a car in Alpharetta this week they discovered a rather unusual passenger.
Laser beam is 'as bright as a billion suns'
6-26-2017
The high-powered Diocles Laser in Nebraska is changing the way that scientists look at the universe.
SpaceX launches two rockets within 48 hours
6-26-2017
The double launch showcased the private space firm's ability to scale up and manage multiple launches.
Anonymous: 'NASA to announce alien life'
6-26-2017
The hacktivist group has suggested that NASA may be on the verge of making a very important announcement.
Other news in this category
SpaceX launches two rockets within 48 hours
Posted 6-26-2017 | 4 comments
The double launch showcased the private space firm's ability to scale up and manage multiple launches....
 
Could the universe itself be conscious ?
Posted 6-25-2017 | 33 comments
The idea that the cosmos may be self-aware has intrigued scientists and philosophers for centuries....
 
Magnetic beam could dispose of old satellites
Posted 6-24-2017 | 2 comments
A French scientist is working on a novel new way to keep Earth's orbit clear of defunct satellites....
 
Mysterious Mars-sized 'Planet Ten' proposed
Posted 6-23-2017 | 8 comments
Astronomers have suggested that there may be more than one mystery planet in the outer solar system....
 
PLATO mission to hunt for Earth-like worlds
Posted 6-22-2017 | 2 comments
ESA is set to launch a new satellite that will seek out potentially habitable extrasolar planets....
 
'Star Chip' could reach Earth 2.0 in 20 years
Posted 6-21-2017 | 20 comments
Stephen Hawking is hoping to send a space probe to a potentially habitable world around Alpha Centauri....
 
NASA discovers 10 near-Earth size exoplanets
Posted 6-19-2017 | 13 comments
Scientists believe that these new worlds lie in the 'Goldilocks zone' of their respective solar systems....
 
Elon Musk reveals vision for city on Mars
Posted 6-15-2017 | 10 comments
The SpaceX CEO has been working towards his goal of seeing mankind become an interplanetary species....
 
Did the Sun once have a companion star ?
Posted 6-14-2017 | 8 comments
New evidence has suggested that all the sunlike stars in the universe may have formed together in pairs....
 
Space nation 'Asgardia' set to launch probe
Posted 6-13-2017 | 3 comments
The so-called 'first nation state in space' is about to make its first foray in to the final frontier....
 
NASA reveals 'Batmobile' concept Mars rover
Posted 6-9-2017 | 5 comments
The futuristic vehicle, which is designed to operate on Mars, was unveiled at the Kennedy Space Center....
 

 View: More news in this category
 
Top   |  Home   |   Forum   |   News   |   Image Gallery   |  Columns   |   Encyclopedia   |   Videos   |   Polls
UM-X 10.7 Unexplained-Mysteries.com © 2001-2017
Privacy Policy and Disclaimer   |   Cookies   |   Advertise   |   Contact   |   Help/FAQ