Friday, May 26, 2017
Contact us    |    Advertise    |   Help   RSS icon Twitter icon Facebook icon
    Home  ·  News  ·  Forum  ·  Stories  ·  Image Gallery  ·  Columns  ·  Encyclopedia  ·  Videos
Find: in
This news story is archived which means that, while it is still available to view, the information contained within may be outdated and the original source site/link may no longer be viewable.

For the most recent stories, please visit either the site's home page or main news section.

Is it ethical to bring back extinct species ?

Posted on Tuesday, 9 April, 2013 | Comment icon 69 comments | News tip by: Render


Image credit: Hobart Zoo

 
Once a species has gone extinct, is it ethically sound to use science to bring it back from oblivion ?

One of the biggest questions raised by the movie blockbuster "Jurassic Park" was that even if we did have the capability to bring extinct species back to life, the question remains whether or not we actually should. With advances in science leading us ever closer to the capacity to resurrect an extinct species, scientists have found themselves pondering the ethical considerations of such an act in addition to the practical possibilities.

One particularly controversial area is in the resurrection of an extinct species of human such as the Neanderthals. If we were able to produce a living Neanderthal, would that person be doomed to a life of scientific experimentation and observation ? Would human rights still apply ?

"Twenty years after the release of Jurassic Park, the dream of bringing back the dinosaurs remains science fiction."

  View: Full article

 Source: Phys.org


  Discuss: View comments (69)

   


 
Recent comments on this story
Comment icon #60 Posted by Myles on 13 April, 2013, 14:36
Unlike an asteroid, humans have the ability to think. It's just unfortunate that a lot of them don't. I agree with that. But it really shouldn't be a factor in bring an animal back.
Comment icon #61 Posted by Hawkin on 13 April, 2013, 20:53
I agree with that. But it really shouldn't be a factor in bring an animal back. I will agree that we are a part of nature since we share this planet with other species. I just feel that since we have the intellect to control our destiny and the destiny of other species, we should repair what we broke.
Comment icon #62 Posted by DieChecker on 14 April, 2013, 2:08
If man had a hand in killing off a species then man should bring it back. It's not the same where dinos became extinct by nature. if humans extinct the creature, then we should be abligated to bring their spicies back as we extincted it What if the species that went extint only lived in one lake, or in one small 1 acre field, and fed off only one kind of plant or flower? Are we going to revive a species that was already 99% extinct? What if the plant or the lake that they depended on no longer exists? That is why I think bring back a species into the world is only a good idea if there is somew... [More]
Comment icon #63 Posted by Hawkin on 14 April, 2013, 3:20
What if the species that went extint only lived in one lake, or in one small 1 acre field, and fed off only one kind of plant or flower? Are we going to revive a species that was already 99% extinct? What if the plant or the lake that they depended on no longer exists? That is why I think bring back a species into the world is only a good idea if there is somewhere for them to live and thrive. Otherwise your good intentions are just creating a second extinction. When I was born, the Earth's population was half of what it is now. I have a feeling that nature will take care of that.
Comment icon #64 Posted by DieChecker on 14 April, 2013, 19:35
When I was born, the Earth's population was half of what it is now. I have a feeling that nature will take care of that. Maybe... Maybe not. Mother Nature is just another god entity that is claimed to have power, but I'd bet she can fade away just as Odin, Jupiter and Zeus have passed away. When humans Create their own environments, we step outside of nature. That is not to say that some plague might not wipe out large numbers of humans, but chiefly what wipes out humans is Other Humans!!
Comment icon #65 Posted by Myles on 16 April, 2013, 22:47
I can certainly understand the arguement that we should only bring back animals who could survive and be prosperous in the wild. Dodo's, Thylacine, passenger pigeon and different deer species would make sense. But I really want both a mastodon and a mammoth to be revived.
Comment icon #66 Posted by markdohle on 19 April, 2013, 14:08
No matter if it is moral to bring back extinct spieces or not... we will do it if we can.
Comment icon #67 Posted by Heaven Is A Halfpipe on 20 April, 2013, 0:50
No it isn't ethical. AKA we'll do it any way until it screws up, then continue to do it. Perhaps if we put a little more effort into looking after the wildlife and animals we already have in the first place then nothing else would be driven to extinction.
Comment icon #68 Posted by Zerocoder on 20 April, 2013, 21:00
No it isn't ethical. AKA we'll do it any way until it screws up, then continue to do it. Perhaps if we put a little more effort into looking after the wildlife and animals we already have in the first place then nothing else would be driven to extinction. most people in the world does not care about the consequenses of their actions, i did not either but now i think twice before i do something No matter if it is moral to bring back extinct spieces or not... we will do it if we can. Agreed, their called animals for a reason and the reason is their not sentient beings that can think and act, the... [More]
Comment icon #69 Posted by DieChecker on 22 April, 2013, 19:20
No it isn't ethical. AKA we'll do it any way until it screws up, then continue to do it. Perhaps if we put a little more effort into looking after the wildlife and animals we already have in the first place then nothing else would be driven to extinction. Compared to most of the world, the US is Mega-Uber-Green. India (overpopulation, disease, industry), China (Farming Nitrites, Industial pollutions), Brazil (Deforestation), Central Africa (burning anything they can find, eating anything they can find, overgrazing, desertification).... are all much worse then the US ecologically. There is more... [More]


Please Login or Register to post a comment.


  On the forums
Forum posts:
Forum topics:
Members:

5912965
254387
167341

 
Some snakes are now known to hunt in packs
5-26-2017
Scientists have revealed that some species of snake have learned how to co-operate and hunt in groups.
Ancient sea monster was the size of a bus
5-26-2017
Palaeontologists in Russia have discovered a huge new sea creature that lived 130 million years ago.
Mystery surrounds 'SOS' in Australian outback
5-26-2017
Police in Western Australia have been investigating a large 'SOS' sign discovered in a remote area.
NASA to probe $10,000 quadrillion asteroid
5-25-2017
The iron-rich asteroid 16 Psyche is so valuable that, if mined, it would collapse the global economy.
Other news in this category
Superheated lava once reached Earth's surface
Posted 5-24-2017 | 0 comments
Scientists have determined that 1,600-degree lava once surged to the surface in what is now Costa Rica....
 
Mount Everest's 'Hillary Step' is destroyed
Posted 5-21-2017 | 7 comments
The infamous rocky outcrop was the last great challenge for mountaineers aiming to reach the summit....
 
Doomsday vault flooded by melting permafrost
Posted 5-20-2017 | 24 comments
Norway's Svalbard Global Seed Vault has been breached by water flooding in through the entrance....
 
Huge 20-meter 'rogue waves' are actually real
Posted 5-13-2017 | 9 comments
Recent research has shown that massive waves can appear out of the blue with surprising regularity....
 
Ambitious UK firm wants to build the Matrix
Posted 5-12-2017 | 15 comments
Improbable is the latest startup hoping to change the world by embracing virtual reality technology....
 
Earliest known recording of JFK revealed
Posted 5-11-2017 | 3 comments
The recording, which was made when Kennedy was 20, has been released by archivists at Harvard University....
 
Graphene could 'revolutionize nuclear power'
Posted 5-9-2017 | 9 comments
Scientists in Manchester have revealed that graphene can make heavy water production more efficient....
 
DARPA investigating fast learning methods
Posted 5-8-2017 | 6 comments
Researchers at DARPA want to make it possible for a soldier to be trained in a fraction of the time....
 
'Thor' drills down 4.7km beneath Iceland
Posted 5-6-2017 | 0 comments
A new experimental project is aiming to generate electricity by harnessing the power of volcanoes....
 
Abu Dhabi firm wants to tow iceberg to the UAE
Posted 5-6-2017 | 17 comments
An impending water shortage in the United Arab Emirates has called for a rather extraordinary solution....
 
Are insects and fake meat the future of food?
Posted 5-5-2017 | 57 comments
Scientists have indicated that we may need to make some major dietary changes over the coming years....
 

 View: More news in this category
 
Top   |  Home   |   Forum   |   News   |   Image Gallery   |  Columns   |   Encyclopedia   |   Videos   |   Polls
UM-X 10.7 Unexplained-Mysteries.com 2001-2017
Privacy Policy and Disclaimer   |   Cookies   |   Advertise   |   Contact   |   Help/FAQ