Wednesday, December 13, 2017
Contact us    |    Advertise    |   Help   RSS icon Twitter icon Facebook icon
    Home  ·  News  ·  Forum  ·  Stories  ·  Image Gallery  ·  Columns  ·  Encyclopedia  ·  Videos
Find: in
This news story is archived which means that, while it is still available to view, the information contained within may be outdated and the original source site/link may no longer be viewable.

For the most recent stories, please visit either the site's home page or main news section.

Will NASA asteroid mission be cancelled ?

Posted on Thursday, 20 June, 2013 | Comment icon 62 comments


Image credit: NASA

 
House Republicans are contemplating whether to push for a Moon base instead of visiting an asteroid.

Despite Obama's pledge to retrieve and then land astronauts on an asteroid, the new draft bill would scrap the entire mission and instead focus the space agency's efforts on establishing a sustained presence on the Moon and Mars. It is unclear how such ambitions goals would be tackled given the current lack of funding and without the precursor 'stepping stone' missions that had been previously planned.

"It is the policy of the United States that the development of capabilities and technologies necessary for human missions to lunar orbit, the surface of the moon, the surface of Mars, and beyond shall be the goals of the administration's human space flight program," the NASA authorization bill states.

"House Republican leaders want to push for outposts on the moon and Mars and they want to push NASA's plan to snare an asteroid into the dustbin, according to a discussion draft of their space spending plan."

  View: Full article

 Source: NBC News


  Discuss: View comments (62)

   


 
Recent comments on this story
Comment icon #53 Posted by Chooky88 on 29 June, 2013, 15:25
A floating rock is a metaphor. You still haven't explained yourself. I took nothing out of context, you were rude Frank as I know many things with impressive pieces of paper to prove it. None of them in the fields of science however . I genuinely want to know why landing once on an asteroid is more scientifically important than a moon base. In my uneducated opinion it's a rock because we know what they are made of and therefore have little to learn from them. A moon base seems to me to be more beneficial to getting off this planet.
Comment icon #54 Posted by Frank Merton on 29 June, 2013, 15:32
The original implication of what you said was a [useless] rock. Now you have backed up and removed the implication, I guess to give you an excuse to get on a high horse. If you think that my response to your thoughtless post was rude, you need a thicker skin
Comment icon #55 Posted by Chooky88 on 29 June, 2013, 23:57
I still think it's useless as I am yet to be convinced otherwise. You keep making it personal on me yet you fail to give me an answer despite repeated requests. Put up or shut up.
Comment icon #56 Posted by danielost on 30 June, 2013, 0:06
I'm not a troll, and what you said was glib and ignorant, and I don't appreciate your taking what I said out of context. When someone refers to an asteroid as nothing more than a big rock, that is glib and ignorant. An asteriod is just a big rock. Earth is just a big rock. Jupiter and saturn are just a bunch of hot gas. Uranis and neptune are just a mixture of them both.
Comment icon #57 Posted by danielost on 30 June, 2013, 0:11
I still think it's useless as I am yet to be convinced otherwise. You keep making it personal on me yet you fail to give me an answer despite repeated requests. Put up or shut up. I see no reason a moon base is less important than the astriod research is, unless they are testing a new rocket or sensor. Something along those lines. Once in space, a ship can use an ion engine which doesn't need to be refueled. I read that nasa is going to test a solar sail.
Comment icon #58 Posted by Merc14 on 30 June, 2013, 4:56
I see no reason a moon base is less important than the astriod research is, unless they are testing a new rocket or sensor. Something along those lines. Once in space, a ship can use an ion engine which doesn't need to be refueled. I read that nasa is going to test a solar sail. A moon base is important but corporations are looking to build it. Let them. Get off the idea that government should do everything, it is ridiculous and unrealistic and heas led to America nit having a manned flight program. Government doesn't do anything right, ever. They dole out the money and industry builds it What... [More]
Comment icon #59 Posted by Chooky88 on 1 July, 2013, 8:39
Thank you for your answers Merc14. I was under the impression that there were just a few type of asteroids and we knew them all, metallic, carbonaceous etc (Yes I cheated and used used Google for the carbonaceous answer). I accept that I too easily dismissed it and I appreciate the clarification. I hereby apologise to everyone for calling them floating rocks. I truly hope that private industry gets more involved in the future as NASA can only do what the Washington Bean counters let them. Countries like mine (Australia) are happy to let NASA go into space and do much of the research for them w... [More]
Comment icon #60 Posted by Frank Merton on 1 July, 2013, 9:41
Break your paradigms and realize that government is highly inefficient and destructive at best. As proof see any socialist country. I was fully with you until the very end (quoted above). Government can be very constructive and very efficient. There is nothing inherent in either state or private enterprise that makes one better than the other for all things. The world is evolving toward mixed economies, neither socialist nor capitalist -- and that is happening in both types as they move toward each other.
Comment icon #61 Posted by Merc14 on 1 July, 2013, 11:24
I was fully with you until the very end (quoted above). Government can be very constructive and very efficient. There is nothing inherent in either state or private enterprise that makes one better than the other for all things. The world is evolving toward mixed economies, neither socialist nor capitalist -- and that is happening in both types as they move toward each other. WE have no manned ship capability at NASA. 'nuff said.
Comment icon #62 Posted by danielost on 3 July, 2013, 9:08
I agree with you. If it had been a private enterprise they would have had the next ship type ready before shutting down the shuttle. But, I have often said any company that is totally backed by the government it will fail. Like the west indies trading company. I know their still around but today they share a small building in london. Monopolies are also doomed to fail. Because they stop inovating, and the customer gets lost.


Please Login or Register to post a comment.


  On the forums
Blood-filled parasites found trapped in amber
12-13-2017
Palaeontologists have discovered prehistoric parasites that once fed on the blood of dinosaurs.
Man-sized penguin fossil found in New Zealand
12-12-2017
The remains of an enormous prehistoric penguin have been found on a beach to the south of Christchurch.
Frozen lake sounds like a Star Wars battle
12-12-2017
This amazing footage of Gun Lake in Canada reveals the cacophony of strange sounds made by the ice.
Mystery object to be checked for ET signals
12-12-2017
An asteroid thought to have come from another solar system is to be checked for signs of alien technology.
Other news in this category
NASA teases new extrasolar planet discovery
Posted 12-11-2017 | 3 comments
The space agency will be making an announcement on Thursday about its latest groundbreaking discovery....
 
Boeing is aiming to beat SpaceX to Mars
Posted 12-9-2017 | 14 comments
Boeing CEO Dennis Muilenburg has stated that the first human on Mars will have got there on a Boeing rocket....
 
Massive, distant black hole 'shouldn't exist'
Posted 12-7-2017 | 8 comments
A newly discovered supermassive black hole is challenging what scientists know of the early universe....
 
Firm develops spacesuit 'take me home' button
Posted 12-5-2017 | 4 comments
The new system offers a much-needed safety feature to help stranded astronauts get back to the ISS....
 
Voyager 1 fires up dormant backup thrusters
Posted 12-2-2017 | 25 comments
NASA has activated the iconic interstellar probe's backup thrusters for the first time in 37 years....
 
Elon Musk is planning to send his car to Mars
Posted 12-2-2017 | 8 comments
The maiden voyage of the SpaceX Falcon Heavy rocket will carry Musk's own Tesla Roadster in to space....
 
ESO astronomers discover 72 new galaxies
Posted 11-30-2017 | 3 comments
The new galaxies date back 13 billion years to a time shortly after the formation of the universe....
 
Beer firm aims to brew Budweiser in space
Posted 11-27-2017 | 14 comments
Anheuser-Busch, the company behind Budweiser beer, wants to create a beverage for people to drink on Mars....
 
Mars liquid water discovery cast in to doubt
Posted 11-23-2017 | 36 comments
Dark streaks on the Martian surface thought to be evidence of water may actually be little more than sand....
 
NASA reveals Cassini 'farewell Saturn' image
Posted 11-22-2017 | 12 comments
A breathtaking mosaic of the iconic ringed gas giant has been put together by the Cassini mission team....
 
Interstellar visitor is red and very dark
Posted 11-21-2017 | 81 comments
An asteroid thought to have come from interstellar space is carrying organic carbon-based molecules....
 

 View: More news in this category
 
Top   |  Home   |   Forum   |   News   |   Image Gallery   |  Columns   |   Encyclopedia   |   Videos   |   Polls
UM-X 10.7 Unexplained-Mysteries.com 2001-2017
Privacy Policy and Disclaimer   |   Cookies   |   Advertise   |   Contact   |   Help/FAQ