Jump to content
Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -

Research turns memory theory on its head


UM-Bot

Recommended Posts

user posted image rContrary to conventional thought dating back to Freud, victims of traumatic events do not subconsciously repress the memories but rather recall them with a clarity reminiscent of reality. That startling finding comes from a five-year-study conducted by researchers at Dalhousie University in Halifax.

The same study, funded by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC) concludes that people have much more difficulty recalling pleasant memories than they do unpleasant.

news icon View: Full Article | Source: News Wire

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 
  • Replies 3
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Brilliant One

    2

  • UM-Bot

    1

  • frogfish

    1

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

I think they are missing the point. It is the intensity of the experience, not if it's pleasant or unpleasant that would create a more accurate memory. A certain impact is required to wallop the memory into the body cells instead of just floating in the mind. Probably sky diving and other high adrenaline adventures would do it. Maybe adrenaline is the key...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is the intensity of the experience, not if it's pleasant or unpleasant that would create a more accurate memory. A certain impact is required to wallop the memory into the body cells instead of just floating in the mind. Probably sky diving and other high adrenaline adventures would do it. Maybe adrenaline is the key...

I don't think so. Many studies disagree too. Intensity may have a part in this, but not much. Otherwise, Freud is completely wrong.

I doubt adrenaline is the key. There are other hormones that play the same part.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think so. Many studies disagree too. Intensity may have a part in this, but not much. Otherwise, Freud is completely wrong.

I doubt adrenaline is the key. There are other hormones that play the same part.

Well, Freud's been wrong before... but then, sometimes a cigar is only a cigar.

I just have a hard time believing that what is labelled 'pleasant' and 'unpleasant' - which are purely subjective if you think aobut it from a non-dualistic point of view such as energy is neutral - that makes a difference to how well things are remembered. If it's not the intensity of an experience that makes a difference it's something above or other than, the realm of 'good' and 'bad'.

By the way, I am totally new at posting here and I don't know if I'll be able to phind - just kidding - find my way back tomorrow. (not kidding about the lost part)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.