Saturday, August 1, 2015   |   7,420 users online
Contact us    |    Advertise    |   Help   RSS icon Twitter icon Facebook icon
    Home  ·  News  ·  Forum  ·  Stories  ·  Image Gallery  ·  Columns  ·  Encyclopedia  ·  Videos  ·  Chat
Find: in

How not to be a paranormal investigator

A panel discussion with James Randi, Banachek, Benjamin Radford, and Matthew Baxter.


Recent comments on this video
Comment icon #7 Posted by Sakari on 3 July, 2013, 15:46
You did not apply for it? And you are trying to make a name for yourself by saying he refused? As I said, you are full of crap. The forums are not where you apply, and not where " management " decides. Keep lying, and I will keep replying that you are. Links please. By the way, what year was this? .....
Comment icon #8 Posted by Mike G on 6 July, 2013, 5:42
Why don't you just predict something else? Are your powers only limited to the date that a single man dies?
Comment icon #9 Posted by Raptor Witness on 6 July, 2013, 5:57
The purpose of that proposal goes far beyond anything to do with me ... It's about how such information could be obtained, and why it would be given. As far as the official application process, if the idea is knocked down on the forum created for a discussion of the prize, then what's the point of wasting my time with fearful men?
Comment icon #10 Posted by Sakari on 6 July, 2013, 16:04
Because that is how you " apply " for the offer.....Hence " application ". If you did not go that route, do not try to state Randi will not accept your challenge, that is lying. A mod, or a member, on the PUBLIC forum said something negative about it and you claim that as " not accepting "........That is B.S. I would like to see the link...Either way.
Comment icon #11 Posted by rashore on 6 July, 2013, 16:17
At this point, I'd like to see a link to the thread as well.
Comment icon #12 Posted by Raptor Witness on 12 July, 2013, 10:59
If James Randi accidentally fell from the observation deck of the Empire State building, I would like to have a tape recording of what he says as he spirals down. Who would he call on for help? Himself? Nobody? God? Only when all hope in human power is extinguished, is the underlying truth of our belief in a Higher supernatural power, revealed. So it will be with all of humanity, and soon. The entire human population of earth is about to fall off the observation deck of the Empire State Building. Who we look to for help, will decide our Individual futures, but not the future of our civiliza... [More]
Comment icon #13 Posted by Sakari on 12 July, 2013, 22:27
So, I guess this means you have no link.....No evidence to support your tall tale. As i said, you are a liar.
Comment icon #14 Posted by Raptor Witness on 13 July, 2013, 8:33
Personal attacks won't change the argument, because it's no longer about James Randi or his prize. It's about a world in denial of the spell of humanism, which teaches that the only thing normal are the endeavors of men. As for me, why concern yourself with my tiny voice? Who calls a mosquito a liar, but a man who is really afraid of something else? My application has already been written on the sky for all to see, and where truth is the prize.
Comment icon #15 Posted by Sakari on 13 July, 2013, 17:09
It is not a personal attack. It is how I feel about you saying that Randi is afraid to accept your challenge. You made the claim, I expressed how I feel about your claim. It is nothing personal. I am " attacking " your reply and claim, not you. Until I see a link that you were denied a chance at that, from Randi and his team, then I say that claim is a lie.
Comment icon #16 Posted by Raptor Witness on 14 July, 2013, 18:33
Anyone with the time to make over 10,000 posts here in the past four years, has plenty of time to reference what I've reported, without my help. Do you always jump to the conclusion that someone is a liar, simply because you're too lazy to reference it yourself? Rather than argue the facts or the merit of the credibility of James Randi as an investigator, whose only probative tool is simply a lot of cash and some headlines, you want to argue why you're too lazy to go get the reference. It's been my experience that the biggest liars are usually those who are too lazy to find... [More]

Please Login or Register to post a comment.

Last updated forum topics
Forum icon 
Recent news in this category
Ghosts 'more likely to be male' claims study
Posted 7-30-2015 | 14 comments
Research involving an analysis of 337 ghost sighting cases has suggested that most ghosts are male.
'Ghost' photobombs pub photo in Liverpool
Posted 7-27-2015 | 23 comments
An actress and her friends discovered an unexpected extra in a photograph taken during a night out.
Ghostly face appears in museum photograph
Posted 7-19-2015 | 22 comments
Amateur ghost hunters have captured an image of what looks like a shadowy woman's face in Torquay Museum.
'Ghostly figure' shows up in CCTV footage
Posted 7-15-2015 | 29 comments
A video showing a strange shadowy figure moving along a corridor has been uploaded on to the Internet.
Liverpool tenants warned about poltergeist
Posted 6-18-2015 | 18 comments
A three-bedroom house has had its rental price reduced thanks to the presence of a disruptive ghost.
Did 'ectoplasm' ever have any basis in fact ?
Posted 6-17-2015 | 59 comments
The controversial substance played a significant role in early 20th century spirit communication.
Mystery hands appear in Mt Kinabalu photos
Posted 6-14-2015 | 37 comments
An unexplained pair of hands has appeared in photographs taken by two separate cameras in Borneo.
Is Charlie Charlie Challenge a PR campaign ?
Posted 6-4-2015 | 64 comments
Rumors have suggested that the viral phenomenon may be a marketing stunt for an upcoming movie.
Top   |  Home   |   Forum   |   News   |   Image Gallery   |  Columns   |   Encyclopedia   |   Videos   |   Polls
UM-X 10.6 2001-2015
Privacy Policy and Disclaimer   |   Cookies   |   Advertise   |   Contact   |   Help/FAQ