Friday, December 15, 2017
Contact us    |    Advertise    |   Help   RSS icon Twitter icon Facebook icon
    Home  ·  News  ·  Forum  ·  Stories  ·  Image Gallery  ·  Columns  ·  Encyclopedia  ·  Videos
Find: in

Bear walks on two legs



Could bears like this one that can walk upright be responsible for sightings of the infamous Bigfoot ?

   

Recent comments on this video
Comment icon #44 Posted by QuiteContrary on 11 March, 2012, 5:12
Yeah, it seems they pop up everywhere except where people are actually looking for them. I recall one guy claiming he encountered one in a dumpster. Wonder if it was a "Squatchy" dumpster? Hmmm. Is it possible to fashion a deadfall trap out of a dumpster?
Comment icon #45 Posted by Earl.Of.Trumps on 12 March, 2012, 19:27
No bigfoot has ever been documented running or taking 15 foot strides. The nose and mouth of bigfoot have never been documented as having any kind of morphology at all. The wide shoulders of bigfoot have never been documented. There has never been any evidence that bigfoot has hands or fingers. Bears so have a well documented and repeatedly observed stench which is well known and accepted as true to wildlife biologists who manage bear populations, or study bears. The stench of bigfoot has never been documented. So, to sum up, the hands, fingers, eyes, nose, shoulders, and stench of bigfoot hav... [More]
Comment icon #46 Posted by Earl.Of.Trumps on 12 March, 2012, 19:41
Amazing that the video is so clear and non-shaky. Funny how bigfoot videos are neither. You do raise a very good point, Rafterman. But.... (notice there is always a 'but') 1) If all ppl reporting to see a BF were really looking at a bear going bipedal, why can't they produce one of these pics/vids as well...? looks pretty simple to me. so guess what,,, these folks reporting to see bigfoot clearly are NOT seeing a bear (in general) 2) So if I can walk down the street and see a dog, I ought to be able to walk down the street and see a BF? Please! different species behave quite differently. Bears... [More]
Comment icon #47 Posted by QuiteContrary on 12 March, 2012, 19:54
You do raise a very good point, Rafterman. But.... (notice there is always a 'but') 1) If all ppl reporting to see a BF were really looking at a bear going bipedal, why can't they produce one of these pics/vids as well...? looks pretty simple to me. so guess what,,, these folks reporting to see bigfoot clearly are NOT seeing a bear (in general) 2) So if I can walk down the street and see a dog, I ought to be able to walk down the street and see a BF? Please! different species behave quite differently. Bears are not really afraid of people, they do not really try to avoid ppl all that much, and... [More]
Comment icon #48 Posted by DieChecker on 12 March, 2012, 20:37
Hi, Someone might have already thought of this, but I just thought that there might be an unknown species of bear living in the USA. They look almost identical to normal bears and that is why no one suspects anything. The major difference is that they can stand up and walk about on their hind legs for long periods of time. This is why people think they have seen a bigfoot, but in fact they have seen a walking bear. If not an unknown species of bear then a small group that have learnt to walk. It is possible as small groups of animals sometimes learn a new trait that only the group they are in ... [More]
Comment icon #49 Posted by Earl.Of.Trumps on 13 March, 2012, 17:20
--Since all or most bigfoot images are too blurry to see a bigfoot couldn't they be too blurry to also see that it is a bear in the photo? Do you have to make this so difficult lol! I suppose if it is too blurry you cannot identify it. my point was if all vids are of a bear it would be just a question of time before one of them is clear. but that is not the case, I guess. and what do you do with vids of a big, blurry animal image taken in an area of north america where no bears exist? --But "the bigfoot thing is to get out of town just as soon as a person comes within a mile" that's just it. P... [More]
Comment icon #50 Posted by Earl.Of.Trumps on 13 March, 2012, 17:25
I came to this same idea some time ago. If no bigfoot bones are found, then there is no bigfoot. But, if bear bones are found, maybe bigfoot is a bear. A fully bipedal bear would probably show up due to muscular and skeletal changes that would be required. But a long legged bear might go practically unremarked. Especially if it was not a different species, but perhaps a recessive genetic birth defect. Also there are were the family of short faced bears, which had much longer legs then modern bears. Long legs + short face = bigfoot? I'd love to do a thread just on "bones" the other day in a rel... [More]
Comment icon #51 Posted by QuiteContrary on 13 March, 2012, 20:22
Do you have to make this so difficult lol! I suppose if it is too blurry you cannot identify it. my point was if all vids are of a bear it would be just a question of time before one of them is clear. but that is not the case, I guess. and what do you do with vids of a big, blurry animal image taken in an area of north america where no bears exist? ppl do "encounter" BFs, yes, but not closely very often. and the encounter never seems to last more than a few fleeting seconds, as the creature darts off into the woods. Bears can get quite forward and if a bear is determined to rummage through you... [More]
Comment icon #52 Posted by DieChecker on 14 March, 2012, 0:45
I'd love to do a thread just on "bones" One thing about bones is that it is rare for a critter, especially a big one like a bear, cougar, deer or even a coyote, to die and the bones to be preserved in the the anatomically correct location. Usually the larger bones get moved around or broken, or carried off, leaving a random scatter of a few large bones and a bunch of the little ones. I've done mock archeological digs as a kid on deer skeletons that I found in the woods behind my parents place and usually the only way I could tell what the bones belonged to was when I found a shoulder blade or ... [More]
Comment icon #53 Posted by DarkCreed on 23 April, 2012, 20:23
LOL. I was laughing xD It looks funny.


Please Login or Register to post a comment.


Last updated forum topics
Forum icon 
Recent news in this category
Greenland shark thought to be 512 years old
Posted 12-14-2017 | 6 comments
Marine biologists have identified what could potentially be the world's oldest living vertebrate.
 
Diver narrowly avoids huge great white shark
Posted 12-11-2017 | 13 comments
New footage has emerged of a diver's extremely close encounter with the jaws of a monster shark.
 
World's deepest fish found 7,966 meters down
Posted 11-30-2017 | 12 comments
A new species of extremely deep-sea snailfish has been found in the depths of the Mariana Trench.
 
Massive hornet's nest removed in new video
Posted 11-27-2017 | 9 comments
Louisiana exterminator Jude Verret was called out recently to remove a truly monstrous nest of hornets.
 
Scientists observe bird evolving in real time
Posted 11-25-2017 | 10 comments
For the first time ever, it has been possible to directly observe one species evolving in to another.
 
Unique moth species looks like a hummingbird
Posted 11-24-2017 | 20 comments
Sightings of a particularly unusual type of moth are becoming increasingly common across the British Isles.
 
Mature white crocodile sighted in Australia
Posted 11-22-2017 | 2 comments
Nicknamed Pearl, the reptile was seen swimming around in the Adelaide River near Darwin on Sunday.
 
Fish could be as intelligent as chimpanzees
Posted 11-12-2017 | 20 comments
Scientists have found evidence to suggest that some fish can use a form of rudimentary sign language.
 
 
Top   |  Home   |   Forum   |   News   |   Image Gallery   |  Columns   |   Encyclopedia   |   Videos   |   Polls
UM-X 10.7 Unexplained-Mysteries.com © 2001-2017
Privacy Policy and Disclaimer   |   Cookies   |   Advertise   |   Contact   |   Help/FAQ