Jump to content
Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -

All Activity

This stream auto-updates

  1. Past hour
  2. It is now crystal clear that Paula Vennells lied to Parliament when she denied Bracknell could remotely alter sub postmasters accounts without their knowledge. Under normal circumstances she would face criminal charges. Under this govt, though, publicly lying has become acceptable. It will be interesting to see the next move.
  3. Like a broken watch, she isn’t wrong, you can’t be a Christian and support abortion.
  4. I don't see or hear them blaming Ds. Just you. Run for office and-then.
  5. Mitt Romney said he was leaving back in September and a whole lot more. He does not like Trump. Our Republican Senator left too last year. This has been going on for a while. Mitt Romney announces he won’t seek reelection as he calls for ‘new generation of leaders’ | CNN Politics
  6. First let me welcome you to the forum, always great see meets new members. I like the design, is fully operational??
  7. Kevin Conde duped a number of debunkers by convincing them that his battered patrol car was used as a prank and debunkers took the bait and ran off with it. Apparently, they were unaware of the rest of the story surrounding the claim of Kevin Conde. Kevin Conde says: "It was fertile ground for a practical joke, and practical jokes are a tradition in the security police. "We just drove through the forest flashing the lights through the fog."It wasn't a UFO, it was a 1979 Plymouth Volare." BBC NEWS | UK | England | Suffolk | UFO lights were 'a prank' Since then, his story had changed. Now, his car wasn't in the forest after all, but on the runway. Question is, why would he be on a runway doing circles without permission from ATC? Latest UFO theory is dismissed "Kevin Conde, who retired as a technical sergeant, stated he wanted to play a prank on one of his colleagues. He apparently drove a battered 1979 Plymouth Volare standard issue American police car down the runway, where he stuck red and green lenses on the spotlights, switched on his loudspeaker and drove around in circles on the runway in the fog while flashing his car lights." "Mr. Conde is unsure exactly when the prank took place, and therefore is not sure if he was inadvertently responsible for the so-called UFO incident." Latest UFO theory is dismissed | East Anglian Daily Times (eadt.co.uk)
  8. NEW YORK CITY, NEW YORK: Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene's onslaught against Speaker Mike Johnson continued into Wednesday, March 27, as she called him out over his Christian values in a lengthy rant on social media. She also slammed members of the House GOP who voted for the two minibus spending bills, which she firmly opposed on the floor, and the passing of which resulted in her filing a motion to remove Johnson as Speaker on March 22. Taking to the social media platform X, the US Representative for Georgia wrote, "@SpeakerJohnson you can't follow Christ and fund full term abortion clinics. That's the inconvenient truth." "And EVERY Republican in my conference that voted for the $1.2 TRILLION woke, trans ideology, DEI, Open Border Policy, abortion ABOMINATION omnibus that is upset with me, YOU should be outraged that your Speaker made you walk that plank for him in order to pay our military soldiers," she continued. "Instead, under Speaker Johnson the House showed them a future Republican Party that not only did NOT listen to its voters, reminded them that the Swamp has its ways and will never change unless it is forced," she said. Marjorie Taylor Greene branded a bigot after she questions Mike Johnson's Christian faith in fiery rant (msn.com)
  9. Today
  10. You mean the same lighthouse that couldn't be seen from the East Gate from where it all started?
  11. You are missing the point as to why they ventured into the forest in the first place and once again, nothing to do with the lighthouse.
  12. Exactly! And it shows that debunkers have allowed themselves to be duped over the Rendlesham case.
  13. And you are missing the point that they didn't see the lighthouse from the East gate - they only saw it later after they had walked towards the edge of the Forest, by Capel Green.
  14. Not to mention that Lighthouse cycles are all faster than 5-6 seconds. Another is Lighthouses don't shine down.
  15. Actually, the shame can be pinned on Skeptoid.com, Tim Printy, CSICOP, Phil Klass and other debunkers and skeptical websites
  16. You are missing the point that the lighthouse cannot be seen from the East Gate from where the case originates, and that proved the lighthouse was not what they saw in the forest nor in the sky.
  17. Skeptoid is a joke and I have noticed a number of false claims issued from that website that debunkers have used in their efforts to debunk UFO cases. For an example, Skeptoid.com says: "Once we look at all the story's elements without the presumption of an alien spaceship, the only thing unusual about the Tehran 1976 UFO case is that planes were chasing celestial objects and had equipment failures." The Tehran 1976 UFO (skeptoid.com) But look what US intelligence agencies revealed about the 1976 Iranian UFO encounter. joint_chiefs_staff_report.pdf (nsa.gov) dia.mil/FOIA/FOIA-Electronic-Reading-Room/FileId/161710/ us_gov_iran_case.pdf (nsa.gov)
  18. Thanks Very Much/Regards. Alchopwn. to Pass By. Your Comment/Question: *Intellectual Property: ·1-Gearturbine / Patent; Dic. 1991 IMPI Mexico #197187, ·2-Imploturbocompressor; Patent Pending. Note; And the Know How, With the Relevant Detail Engineering Evolution Changes. (And Plenty Global Patent Paper Work Still to do.)
  19. I've never heard of a Roman (intentionally) non-fatal crucifixion. However, the point of the exercise is that it takes so long to die, and therefore offers the potential for use in coercive interrogation. Supposedly, a variant (Palestinian hanging is searchable) is used by modern intelligence services, and also supposedly, either Jacques DeMolay himself or a fellow Templar was nailed to a door for a while. You seem to be talking about it as a judicial punishment rather than an investigative technique. That would be worth digging out if you could. Is it possible that you were thinking of crucifixion as part of a more elaborate fatal execution? For example, crucify the victim for a while and then burn them alive. The crucifixion would not be the cause of death in such a case, but the punishment would still be capital for an exceptionally serious crime (perhaps arson in the hypothetical).
  20. Yeah, could have been a whole lot worse is for sure
  21. I didn’t look it at from that perspective, however now I see your point, and actually Maltesit great sense. I don’t know what the deal is, however it seems you’re probably right they have something on him. Unfortunately, I doubt we will ever know for certain exactly what it is they are hold over his head. Peace Tate.
  22. No-one from the USAF bases had been in the forest in the middle of the night before. Why would they? Whatever prompted them to leave on this occasion, when they approached the cottage at Capel Green they saw the lighthouse - which they had no reason to have expected or to have known about. Thus confounding them.
  23. My staff do. I sometimes don the gloves but rare these days, made big money since Brexit and actually employ people, generate wealth, actually doing something worthwhile supporting approx 50 families of those who work for me.
  24. Wait! Forget Money and think POWER. IMO, It is not about money or Investing for a financial return. To the guys running the show, small investors are inconsequential chum in the water. They came to feed the shark. It is about giving Trump $2-4 billions dollars legally and under our noses and expecting big favors in return. It is the favors that have value, not the stock. For a guy with $10-20 billion dollars or more, $500 million might be a bargain to prevent the government from forcing Tik Tok sale or American Foreign policy to favor Saudi Arabia or some other nation. What we are really talking about is buying the presidency of the United States., not some piddly-ass social media company. Even guys like Putin and Xi might consider some of that action. I think these guys are smart, so they must have some hold or form of colleterial that Trump cannot walk away from or negate with the power of the presidency. They know he is the snake in the poem he loves so much and they know how he loves biting those who he makes fools. It makes him feel superior. So they must have some pretty good protection. In short, I think this could be a very bad deal for democracy.
  25. Yes, it does! To the rest, I'm done with your passive aggressive insults. Have a good day...
  26. I'm not an Andrew Bolt fan. Or Alan Jones. Rarely ever watch either. Not sure where you got that info from, but you're being led a bum steer! Or is it just because you see me as right wing and these are prominent right wing Aussies? That said, the proof is there in black and white. If you don't like the term "empirical" use whatever term you like, it fits well enough for me! Post whatever you like, wherever you like. No skin off my nose
  1. Load more activity