Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -

All Activity

This stream auto-updates   

  1. Past hour
  2. Noooooo... now you look like Stalin !!!
  3. the comments are good as well --- a couple of them.. "I am a Belgian and I posted also bad things about Kilary Clinton. Why am I not indicted? Why are they not investigating Belgian interference in US elections? I feel humiliated now." "Vote Trump in the next election!!!Now Mueller comes after me?LOL:-)Ps: Im not a US american." I made a few pro Trump comments on line before the election...... should I expect a knock on the door and will the UK government receive demands for my extradition....? *hides under the bed.... no no better not hide there that's where they always look for Reds... .... quickly puts on a disguise .... (little plastic mustache out of a christmas cracker) *
  4. so it's no-lose, isn't it! Whether you're pro Hilarity or anti Hillary, pro Trump or anti Trump, pro Obama or anti Obam, pro Putin or anti Putin, or you just like pictures of puppies, it's all proof of a Russkie plot! I suppose the only proof against a Russkie plot would be if the entire United States was absolutely unified in 100% adoration of Her - and of course have unquestioning 100% loyalty and trust in American Institutions. So anyone having an opinion of their own at all on anything it's all because of a Russkie plot!!
  5. I was speaking in general, as sometimes you're clear, and sometimes you're not (maybe it's just a 'me' thing) sorry if I offended you. Thank you for your opinion. I'm sure in due time tho, that much of this sticky / messy business concerning Russia's involvement or not in the election will eventually become clearer, as the investigation progresses / and or finally winds down. Either way, we can all speculate about this until the cows come home. But without any facts or hard evidence presented at this time that any said collusion took place or not. Well, it aint over till the fat lady sings.....
  6. and how much of it was remotely serious enough to warrant a Special Investigation and the very head of the FBI being involved and millions of taxpayers' dollars being spent on it for years? Those were all things that any competent judge could have handled.
  7. Nice to put a face to the name
  8. Today
  9. The "indictment", if you can dignify it by calling it that, is really very funny. Excerpts from it here , but here's one highlight: Exchanged an intelligence report regarding the trip! "So here I am, where's that, Comrade Aleksandra? "Oh, probably the Grand Canyon, honey, it's hard to tell because my finger's over the lens, I'm afraid I'm never any good at taking selfies". "But here, look! Here am I in New York! And that in the background might possibly be the Trump Tower." At this point the Grand Inquisitor, Brother Mueller, stands up and points a tremulous finger. "See? They had contact with Trump! This is all the proof we need! To the dungeons with them!" "But they are in Moscow, under the protective wing of their reviled leader, O Grand Master", protests a minion. "Very well! To the dungeons with Trump! Some Shadowy Russians once took a selfie of themselves with a what might possibly be a building owned by him in the background! Put him to the Inquisition!"
  10. Oh thats how it it? The last joke I ever remember taking offence to was about the smell of Jews being gassed/burnt in Auschwitz.... perhaps thats OK with you too? or....Oh its just seeder having a wobble? Joking about the smell of Jews burning.....was JUST me misreading posts? Perhaps I shall invite read some...very particular....posts of yours... some of us have standards..... and YOU.....are supposed to be a who has rapidly lost my respect...
  11. A little detail usually means a little detail, unless they mean a little detail on the light??? As for the rest, l find it ironic that individuals who don't believe in what this site is all about, (proving that UFO's are real, and ghosts, etc) either crack the s***ts or attack the messanger when one of proven. This site isn't here for a small army of rapid deniers to scare, bully, intimidate, discredit and p***off anyone trying to show something is true, it is here for the opposite reason.
  12. Vlad the Mighty

    Every Dollar, Pound and Euro you send us helps us reach more people and to continue to shed light on the social-political issues of our time.

    So please, give with great generosity. ^_^

  13. The first name of Richard Dawkins, the well known all-purpose expert, is actually Clinton. Clinton Richard Dawkins FRS FRSL (born 26 March 1941) is an English ethologist, evolutionary biologist and author.
  14. If they rather follow the rules of their imaginary friend I say send them to prison.
  15. Correct me if I am wrong, I am not Roman Catholic so limited in my knowledge of it, but where in the bible does it say that priests should hear confession and preserve anonymity of the confessor? This law is man made by the church, probably to ensure the sale of indulgences or whatever they were called, where you could pay to have all your sins absolved. Something along those lines and was commonplace in earlier times. Not sure if it is still done now. The greater the reassurance that your sins would not be divulged to earthly policing the more money they would take in.
  16. Surely this is proof of collusion with Ukraine, which is hardly going to be anxious to promote Russian interests is it? Just the opposite if anything.
  17. heck of a lot if so....isnt it?
  18. confused? How come? I think my position is fairly clear. The whole thing's a completely manufactured witchhunt, which relies on totally tenuous insinuations and guilt by association. There, I think that's reasonably clear, isn't it? Not to say that I believe the sun shines out of Trump, er, hairpiece, there's many things you could perfectly legitimately criticize him for, but this whole "scandal" was, my personal opinion is, concocted by the losing party to give them an excuse and avoid having to face the obvious.
  19. Bolded: no pilots can make mistakes but in this case there is scientific proof to back up what the pilot saw. Red: well this craft was recorded. and your point is what? if it moves like a duck, acts like a duck and quacks like one... its a duck!
  20. It is the very same thing imo. If the rights of a victim over rule everything else and confidentiality, then it applies to both, surely?
  21. because it's straight out of Sen. McCarthy's witchhunting handbook. Don't you see that? "You once met some Russians, who may have been Shadowy. You are consequently guilty of Un-American Activities. Take him away!".
  22. special in the sense that the U.S. are world leaders in aerospace and technology. they have resources and methods of analytical detection second to none. they had a pilot eyewitness... a radar and camera recording to prove it. now if the aircraft is employing aerodynamics beyond those we have then what other conclusion can be made?
  23. Indeed, it's been shown pretty conclusively that the "Steele Dossier", for one, was almost certainly a Ukrainian propaganda operation.
  24. What substance do you post? Just the latest gossip about some absurd "Shadowy Russians" who may or may not have once posted something on facebook. And you say others have no substance?! You're about the only one keeping this ridiculous affair going.
  1. Load more activity