All Activity

Iran is denying that anything was bombed in Iran claiming everything was intercepted. Nothing is really making it online but these seem to be from the bombing. If that is from Iran, which I'm not completely sure yet, it seems a power substation was hit given the blue flash. That is claimed to be a fire from the bombing. It seems Israel targeted stuff near cities or nuclear facilities without hitting the cities or nuclear facilities directly. The extent of the damage should become clear over the next 24 to 48 hours.

They've always done it. Nasa' equipment always cost billions more than justifiable common sense .

I really don’t know how it can be legal. But according to Trump and his base none of issues have been disproven no matter what a court of law says. Look at post 86, this is a clear example of how Trumps base views things. People like this are at least verbally ready to destroy the country, it’s pretty sad when you consider source.

Leave aside the mockery , Baba Vanga was not even remotely close to those croocks and fake profets. She was so accurate that presidents and even the tiran Ceausescu had visited her to learn more about her visions. The spirit world is very powerful and some havw learn to listen tonthe future. Humanity is not in a good place right now, the sum of sin and blasphemy against God is pulling us all down, rapidly.

And sometimes the person was simply crazy

https://www.newsmax.com/newsfront/iran-iraq-syria/2024/04/18/id/1161598/ It sounds like several sites in Iran have been hit as well as some in Syria and Iraq.

Oh, really? Then point to any single good example of testimony being accepted as proof of the paranormal. Testimony is the lowest ranked form of legal evidence, and in Science it is not accepted as any type of evidence unless it is fully supported by *other* evidence. And in legal terms there is always a crime and evidence of that crime, eg a body for murder, or a burnt down business for arson. Your argument is founded on a fundamental lack of understanding of law and science. The question still stands, why do you keep avoiding nominating the best case with actual evidence? And why is it that as cameras and surveillance get better and better, the claims are going down, and the lack of just one good capture becomes increasingly damning for your belief? And before you whinge... original video footage and image files CAN be verified by forensic science, so if it's shown to be real.. you win. Surely that would be worth it...

Thats mighty harsh, we are all Americans hopefully there is another way out!

Cool, I learned a new word and I like it better than paranoia that I used but didn't think it fit well, When stressful crap happens my OCD kicks in harder and I go into hypervigilance mode, and the reason is, sorry drop bear zero paranormal it is a knee jerk to keeping myself safe, just that simple. Years back when humans were prey it was pretty darn important to surviving to know what creature is watching you considering would you make a good dinner.

You’re really an angry fellow, there are months to November and you’re already preaching gloom and doom. Do you ever have anything positive to say?

Syrian reports indicated airstrikes targeted sites belonging to the Syrian Army in the As-Suwayda and Daraa Governorates of southern Syria. https://www.jpost.com/breaking-news/article-797866

Captain Nemo and his Nautilus, of course.

I just hope he’s not actually a drunk himself, because that would be ridiculously hypocritical.

I can’t say I blame you. The professor likes to throw down some fancy word salads from time to time, and he hates drunks.

I don't pigeon hole trying as you do to force fit anything and everything into some completely and totally unproven category label for outlandish tales, of course if real a humanoid rabbit giving gifts would fit in there but it doesn't exist. Did you ever at some point have that epiphany moment or does your belief hinge on hearing enough tall tales makes the story real for you

He was a total a-hole, he didn’t like me and I didn’t like him.

Does PA count as a supporter?

He’s not taking any democrat votes from the president he is taking independent votes. People tend to forget that both democrats and republicans are minorities and nearly all of them can always be counted on to vote by party lines no matter what. The majority of voters are independent and it’s they that both parties really need.

Yet.

You talk like there are Kennedy supporters in this forum. I have seen no evidence of that.

None. In this world, there is no way a Palestinian state would be turned loose to continue a war. EU and US backed idea is for a multinational force (not US) to man the border between the two states. Hamas is not a state, and I suspect one condition of a Palestinian state is zero tolerance for harboring any terrorist organizations. The Palestinian Authority is also a has-been organization. They can complain and protest but any progress has to happen in the world of the possible. Worst case, a new Palestinian State declares war on Israel? Israel will destroy their population centers and allow the population to starve. Status quo.

As these claims have been disproved in a court of law, how is this legal?

Of course, Thank you, Kennedy couldn't beat Biden but could he beat BOM? Ah, hum, Grab the popcorn

Curious how you rated the quality of those easter bunny stories for paranormality. I consider quantity, quality and consistency as I mentioned myself.

Well this is what bewildered me. How can Kennedy be stealing democrat votes when his character and policies are Maga? Republicans tend to lap up the conspiracy theories. It strikes me that he would be more appealing to the them than democrats.