Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -

All Activity

This stream auto-updates   

  1. Past hour
  2. Let me reword that. I am not afraid of any bad woo when handling grave goods and medicine bundle burial sites. The world wide flood is really bad science , really bad. The water trapped in the mantle cannot just spring up. only percolate really slowly. It's inside the rock itself in very tiny bubbles. Like the way water is entrapped in all limestones. Also there is no geological evidence for it. The only evidence is for localized floods. This was probably Noah's Flood
  3. Humour is excellent. I remember Vogons of course and also that part about the worst poetry in the universe.. alot of things really. Great humour is one dimension of the book, but it really as central theme has a sort of opposite spirit towards world as religions do. It begins with the intro at how insignificant earth is in cosmic terms, when main character's house is about to be demolished and earth too because it is in a way for making a cosmic highway. One of the main lines of atheistic thinking is in terms of insignificance of earth as opposed to previous teachings about earth as a center of the universe.
  4. By political theater, I assume you mean that those indictments directly damage the Trump narrative that Russia didn't interfere in the election. You don't just wake up one morning and decide to indict 13 Russians. What they're accused of doing is laid out in the indictments. If your only safeguard against mass data harvesting by the general public is trust -- then I'd argue that the system is flawed by design. Facebook should have anonymized the data, but the issue is that mass data harvesting is pretty much Facebook's own business model. Mostly because Steve Bannon -- Trump's campaign manager -- was on the board of Cambridge Analytica. LONDON — Conservative strategist Stephen K. Bannon oversaw Cambridge Analytica’s early efforts to collect troves of Facebook data as part of an ambitious program to build detailed profiles of millions of American voters, a former employee of the data-science firm said Tuesday. The 2014 effort was part of a high-tech form of voter persuasion touted by the company, which under Bannon identified and tested the power of anti-establishment messages that later would emerge as central themes in President Trump’s campaign speeches, according to Chris Wylie, who left the company at the end of that year. Among the messages tested were “drain the swamp” and “deep state,” he said. Source: Washington Post As I've said before -- I don't believe micro-targeting in and of itself is illegal.
  5. It sums up quite nicely what they're protesting about, doesn't it?
  6. Superstitious: excessively credulous belief in and reverence for supernatural beings. Ya I would say that fits me to some degree, but not in a fearful way. There is much evidence for many of the worlds Megalithic structures being buried in sediment, and countless stories about the same or similar plot line(s), which means the early people remembered the same event, and many stories say it was the whole world, from their perspective. When you take into account the Hydroplate theory and the evidence for there actually being underground water stores that may be three times that of the ocean, in addition to the realization that in the deepest parts of oceans are literal fountains of Hot toxic water, and you see the evidence of mountains and Monolithic structures having major amounts of erosion, that it is possibly true. The Hebrews and Semetic people claim fountains of the deep shot out water, and this water rained from the clouds after it had evaporated, I.E. Book of Enoch1. So if the Ocean was drammatically smaller in the past, because much of the water was hidden within and under the crust, that these deep fountains were likely part of this flood phenomenon. I have already linked much of what is mentioned here, and I am sure that if you look around yourself you should find more to back this claim.
  7. Haha, well maybe some hold it as such. To me it's just brilliant dead pan humour that simultaneously pokes fun at life, the universe and everything. One of my favourite lines, read from the guide:
  8. I feed the wild birds the same as I do my canaries finches etc it may cost me a little more but I know it's safe they seem to like millet and foriegn finch mix best
  9. The left is extremely upset that Bolton is now the National Security Advisor will soon be even more upset as he has promised to do a deep cleaning on the entire council starting with holdovers from the corrupt Obama administration and any brought in under McMaster. his should go a long way towards stopping some of the leaks we have seen over the last year. Hopefully any of these corrupt officials who leaked classified info will be prosecuted and sent to jail.
  10. There are only so many times I will repeat myself before shrugging my shoulders and walking on. Most of your response here either ignores or misrepresents my arguments, so if I omit anything here, it's simply because I've already answered it and don't care to again. This is absolute utter nonsense. I'm arguing that all people have the individual right to equal opportunity healthcare and education. Under our current system, a person could literally die simply because they were born into poverty and can't pay their medical expenses, so they forego proper treatment. Where is this person's right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness? In all of the examples I've given thus far, my primary concern has solely been about people's individual rights being protected by law. This isn't about power or dictatorial control, it's about a government actually doing it's intended purpose of protecting the general welfare of it's people. I've already explained this to you, but since this is essentially the core underlying difference between our philosophies, I feel it bears repeating. When people are born into abject poverty, they do not have the same rights as other individuals. They don't have the money to pay any medical expenses, they don't have the money to get a higher education so that they could potentially get ahead, and if they aren't provided a living wage for working full time then they definitely can't get ahead since they don't even make enough money to meet their bare basic necessities like food and utilities. You're pretending that under our current system, Americans somehow already have equal opportunity to acquire wealth, when it's just a flat-out objective fact that they don't. If someone is born into poverty, it's nearly impossible to get ahead. Literally all I'm asking for is to provide basic things that will insure that all people actually have an equal opportunity to get ahead, such as: a minimum wage that's a living wage so that people can afford basic necessities, free college tuition to those who are intelligent and hard-working enough to make the grade, universal healthcare coverage so that people don't go sick or die or go bankrupt simply because they don't have the money, etc. This is not some sort of 'nanny program' as you suggest. Not by any stretch of the imagination. It's simply providing the proper steps necessary to insure that ALL Americans have the equal opportunity to succeed. So government control is bad when it involves providing healthcare, but it's perfectly fine when it involves a police state? The only possible way it could be the cop's fault is if you expect the government to prevent all crimes from ever happening to begin with. I mean seriously, have you ever watched that movie Minority Report? By saying it's the police's fault for not preventing crime from ever occurring basically, you're advocating for the most extreme form of government policing one could imagine. I honestly think you're just being a contrarian at this point. Whatever position is presented by me or the person you've decided you disagree with, you have to take the opposing view just because. Unfortunately you're once again, flat wrong about this. You're acting as though Obamacare was implemented in the hopes of one day instituting single-payer. If that were the case, then they would've just skipped to passing single-payer healthcare coverage. Why the unnecessary stepping stone? Democrats held both the executive and legislative branches, they could've implemented it if they so desired. But they didn't, because they were beholden to the whims of the drug companies that owned them by financing their campaigns. Obamacare was simply a means of tossing breadcrumbs out to the starving masses so as to appease them. Establishment dems in Washington have no desire to implement single-payer, because big pharma who owns them has no desire to since it hurts their bottom line. That's once again, absolutely false. In fact, practically the exact opposite is true. We're spending more on private healthcare then we are under a single-payer system. I doubt you've actually read anything on single-payer however (nor would you most likely understand, or even care to), but nonetheless here's the link to Bernie Sanders' actual proposal: And here is an official ebook brochure on the topic that gives a general overview: booklet-2014-final-pages.pdf You have openly supported torture, murdering the innocent wives and children of terrorists, potentially nuking North Korea thereby murdering literally millions of innocent people, preemptive offensive wars as opposed to wars purely for defense, described the purpose of the military as being 'to destroy our enemies' as opposed to just simply protecting the homeland, and now this. You genuinely believe that we need to quote: "assure that we spend more than the next 15 nations combined (at the minimum)." This is where I with 100% all honestly have no idea how to respond, since I don't know how in the world to appeal to someone who lacks such basic humanity and compassion as this. How do I get someone to care about the general welfare of the American people, when they don't even care about the literally hundreds of thousands of innocent civilians in other countries who have died due to our failed and senseless military conquests? I genuinely wonder if I brought up the fact that an 8 year old American girl died in the first military strike ordered by Trump, if you'd even care. How you fail to see the parallels between this and North Korea is unfathomable to me. This isn't me trying to be insulting, I'm just being perfectly honest with you. I don't understand how someone could support something so blatantly morally bankrupt like this. Once again, this crosses the threshold of any mere political disagreements with you, and into the realm of just straight-up moral disagreements. I think I need to do some further research into how exactly to appeal to someone with extreme apathy... There is no rational basis for the claim that their happiness factor is due to a state of blissful ignorance. You're asserting that to be true out of thin air. If you actually read the link I provided, you'd know that there were a number of key factors they used to determine statistically the state of overall happiness, not just simply asking the people if they feel happy. They looked at things such as median income, healthcare, financial security, economic state of the overall country, etc. There were numerous factors involved in determining it. It wasn't just a questionnaire. Pulling some convenient answer out of literal nowhere is not how you make a rational argument. You have to back up your claims on at least something. I believe Trump's campaign rhetoric speaks for itself. Nobody works hard enough to deserve a billion dollars. Nobody. The millionaires and billionaires that run this country are the very definition of corruption. I have no desire to be like them. That has nothing at all to do with the amount of money they own, it has to do with their character, and the fact that for the most case, they didn't earn it. They simply inherited it. Yet once again, you're defending the people screwing you over. I'm beginning to think that we have some sort of mass Stockholm syndrome going on...
  11. I’m definitely with Ph80 on this. The founders laid out a very clear path to war. That process has illegally been subverted. This country has been committing crimes against humanity for decades now. It’s gotten much worse since 9/11, obviously. This was the one thing I was worried about in having a president with no political experience. Though I don’t think he has been as bad as the last two clowns, I don’t think he even realizes how illegal things like that Syrian strike was. In fact the media and the Dems technically could have had him impeached over it. No way they are doing that though, for obvious reasons. I find it scary that the legality of these wars ar even in question. Congress must declare war, unless we are being directly attacked. That is the law, and anything less is illegal. Congress can not just hand that power to the president to bomb anyone he wants, when ever he wants. Rand Paul is 100% right on this. I don’t believe it’s a matter of opinion at all. I’m not ready to completely abandon Trump, but I think his base does no one any favors making light of the mistakes he’s made. Including this train wreck of a spending bill. I’m gonna wait and see what mid terms, and what results from it bring. I don’t think I have a lot of patience left though.
  12. I zoomed in a bit the lips/mouth are exactly where the window frame is and the hair looks like someone's shoulder but that's just the way i see it
  13. I do, but I also have a background in archaeology and geology and because I wasn't a superstitious knucklehead was always pegged for digs by different archaeology firms.
  14. Wrist Rockets are illegal in New Jersey but I never saw the law enforced even when they damaged someone or something. I use to wear one of the folding ones when I didn't have enough money for .22s. and a little bag of steel balls taken from the bad throwout bearings on our 6600.
  15. Interesting. I am glad that you shared this information. I do not discredit a worldwide flood, and I am noticing the similarity in theories, this information can still be helpful to the Historical spectrum.
  16. It is simply the easiest way of pointing out the left's endemic hypocrisy.
  17. Taun

    "Ahhh, But I was so much older then,

    I'm younger than that now"

  18. In terms of Roman occupation, crucifixion was the 'Sword of Damocles' that the Romans used to intimidate conquered nations, somewhat similar to the way ISIS intimidates with YouTube videos of beheadings. "In the first century BC, during the revolt of Spartacus, there were reports of over 6,000 crosses with crucified victims on the road from Capua to Rome, and in the first century AD, the Romano-Jewish scholar Josephus reported that up to 500 Jews were crucified every day during the siege of Jerusalem." Aside from historical references, there is only one set of crucified remains that are dated to the time of Jesus. The bodies were left to hang until they were completely decomposed, which added to the intimidation factor: "Although the ancient Jewish historian Josephus, as well as other sources, [which?] refers to the crucifixion of thousands of people by the Romans, there is only a single archaeological discovery of a crucified body dating back to the Roman Empire around the time of Jesus. This was discovered at Givat HaMivtar, Jerusalem in 1968. It is not necessarily surprising that there is only one such discovery, because a crucified body was usually left to decay on the cross and therefore would not be preserved. The only reason these archaeological remains were preserved was because family members gave this particular individual a customary burial."
  19. 994. "Supersonic weapon" (12/6/2017) One week ago, I wrote #993, allege the Feds(FBI and DEA) colluding with Chinese secret police, planed a framed drug case on my relatives on Thanks Giving Day. Then I had diarrhea. At first I thought it might be caused by poisoned food. I reduced the variety of dishes to exclude suspicious poisoned food. Two days later, when I noticed the excrement were all in liquid style, I thought of "Super sonic weapon". About two decades ago, the Feds applied EM wave weapons heavily on me, one was that "supersonic weapon". In a news paper article that introduced "Pentagon high technique weapon", it said the supersonic wave could break up the excrement in human's intestine into liquid. Intestine can't hold the water so people have to release it immediately. "Imagine in battlefield, when commander gives order to charge, the soldiers all have a loose stool and can't stand up." The story faded away with time. Mainly it's hard to feel the existence of such a weapon. There is no other symptoms that can prove it. I think it is one kind of acoustic weapon. The principle is to use resonance frequency to break the excrement into liquid. People can not tell it from a natural bowel movement if the Feds not overly apply it on victims. I view it as a punishment of revenge. That's common in Fed's practice. It proves my allegation - the Feds colluded with Chinese secret police are planing a framed drug case on my relatives. 995. Mayor's death (12/12/2017) San Francisco Mayor Ed Lee died suddenly today.
  20. The archaeology and linguistic evidence shows the Algic Peoples cut straight in half by the Lake Missoula Flood. Algonquians on one side Yurok-Wiyot on the other with all the flood evidence in between. The Meteor Theory was that it actually hit the Hudson Bay and busted the ice sheet up but that theory is still up in the air. I was out with a team looking for evidence when I worked with this one museum. I was also with the same team that tracked the paths of the Lake Iroquois Flood. Which was probably the origin of the Siouian-Iroquoian Flood Legend.
  21. I saw a very vivid"Rainbow" orb on our bedroom wall I knew it was on the wall because I was in bed about 8ft away,I put my hand up and covered it up then it just dissappeared a few weeks later I saw it again woke my wife up whispered for her to look but she couldn't see a thing which is odd as for what it was I don't haveven a clue
  22. Trump asks Russian to hack Hillary
  23. Worse? Like losing my wallet? *shudders* What do I have my Hatopus for, if not to keep my head attached to my body?
  24. You gotta admit it is pretty biblical. "Let he who is gun-less cast the first stone."
  25. 290. Super market (2/9/05) 2/9 is Chinese New year's day. The meal of Chinese New Years eve. for Chinese is as important as Thanks Giving meal to Westerns. Early this month, when I asked my wife to drive me for some Festival food, she refused again and told me to shopping on foot. I view this as the intention of Feds. It seems they determined to eliminate me in road violence. Then why my wife broke the rule to drive me for a food shopping on 1/29? (see "288. Vanished old case and new plan (2/4/05)) Because on that day, Feds arranged a family re-union. On the purpose to invite me to join a trip to China. They knew my relatives would drive me for a food shopping at my will. So they let my wife did it in advance because I had to go the store my wife drove me to. I was surprised for the easiness of my wife. That was the only one drive she gave in five weeks. About half hour after we finished shopping, my relatives came. I then knew why my wife eased to give a drive. I still asked my brother in law to give me a drive despite my wife's protest that I just finished a shopping. I led my brother in law to another shopping center about 20 minutes driving away. Where there is a water store supplying bottled water which was sealed right away after official examination of water quality. But on that day the owner of water store said the sealed bottle water was sold out which used to be plenty of. I then went to the super market nearby and found big price gap between the stores I just attended to. For example, the vegetable was 0.59 a pound and apple was 0.39 a pound while in the store my wife brought me to was 0.99 and 0.59 appropriately. Such a price difference would drive customers from one store away to the other. One year ago, the food Feds poisoned in super market was in small quantity and was concentrated on cheap items I used to buy. Then as I started to buy in random, Feds changed tactic too. The food they poisoned now are in large quantities, piles up in rack. (see "189. Poison food in super market (12/16/03) ) Bread, rice, milk, ham, bottled water, vegetables, potato chips, can food...... . To avoid too much people been poisoned, they set up several super-market in which food was poisoned most and price also tagged high. To drive customers away to the stores which priced lower where poisoned food is also less. That's why the store I was sent to by my wife were the expensive one. But that will hurt the business of super market which priced high. How did Feds persuade the owner of these store to do so? For western style super market, it used to be chain stores such like Safeway, Albertson. Feds controls high ranking management, so there should be no problem for them. But Chinese store mostly are run by independent owners, how did Feds do on them? In late 2003, when Feds aggressively increased poison dose, there was an arrest in my area which shocked Chinese society. An owner of super market and his accountant were arrested. Tax fraud was the charge. The bail was set up at 5 million dollars. The defendant couldn't afford such high bail, had to stay in jail. The case was in court again in mid-2004. Judge still maintained the same amount of bail. So the defendant still had to stay in prison. It was obviously an intimidation to Chinese super market business. If you don't obey, we can keep you in jail. Business loss or jail, which will you choose?
  1. Load more activity