Jump to content
Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -

All Activity

This stream auto-updates     

  1. Past hour
  2. Acronym it! (Part 2)

    Pretty Uranian Priestress Irradiates languorously A X L E S
  3. acute

    Donald Trump looks 10 years younger than Joe Biden thanks to eating babies!!!

    1. acute



  4. "Ok to be gay" school lessons cause unrest

    There’s having a private life, and then there’s keeping your life private in order to avoid a lynch mob. It’s about a man being able to say in casual conversation ‘my boyfriend’ or ‘my husband’ and a woman being able to say ‘my girlfriend’ or ‘my wife’ without judgement or criticism or outright hatred. Alan Turing, genius, war hero, died because of his sexuality, accepted castration, and died believing he was criminally and socially disfigured. This tragedy alone should highlight just how heinous the lack of understanding is. He was only pardoned in 2013, and just him, all the other gay people who weren’t famous remain criminals. As for the school. Teachers aren’t going to be delivering sex education, they’re not going to be saying gay men like bum sex, lesbians don’t like penetration. All it will be is it’s okay for men to love men and women to love women. This is important because regardless of someone’s religion they are growing up in a society where actually, these things are okay. Religion does not trump law, and ultimately if these kids with their stupid parents grow up believing the devil has made them fundamentally evil they are going to get into all sorts of legal trouble.
  5. Man drop-kicks Arnold Schwarzenegger

    It didn't seem to phase him too much.. Bodyguard was smart enough to drag him off camera..I'm sure that idiot is hurtin' today.
  6. {un}holy haiku - 3rd Edition

    oh, I told you so ghost a-go-go in the flesh "shhh", they might hear us
  7. sure, i believe the cash incident was a secret craft "we" were testing. to be honest i have seen more than one doctor claim to be cashs orginal dr, but i have seen doctors who without question examined her and say no way radiation was involved, on one documentary one of her drs compared her symptoms of radiation poisoning to someone in Hiroshima i suspect more for dramatic flare than actual scientic reasons, then radiation specialists say no, shecwasnt exposed to radiation, a problem here is its all hearsay because there is no published anything that proves she has any radiation exposure. so no, i do not believe radiation was involved at all, but if it was she wasnt exposed to it. of course i dont think ET had anything to do with it but it was by definition a UFO. the intelligent being i believe made this craft are lowly humans. since i didnt says "flames" you are misquoting me , i suggested heat, car exhaust will burn you and shouldn't be a flame at the tail pipe, ive always been into rc stuff and many years back when the mini helicopters came out i saw this, dont laugh, its small toy but serves where im going, the craft cash saw might have been very simple and prop driven, drone stuff, in the dark she wouldnt have seen blades and it would have had a hot down draft, more so if malfunctioning, and who knows what type engine,
  8. anton00

    Being authentic?

    Life is not always easy,

    And one may need masking.

    However... dare be yourself,

    Express your self.

    To be you, have the balls,

    We live only once, after all.



  9. XenoFish

    I wonder what my brother would've been like?

  10. I don't see the problem! After Brexit and the next Scottish Independence vote, Hadrian's Wall will be rebuilt (at its original height) by the Scottish National Party.
  11. Australian Federal Election 2019

    That is true and its a passive way to make a statement.
  12. So am i, it is a fact there is a right and a wrong, but some are obvious, some debatable. By whom?
  13. Pluto has an underground ocean kept warm by a layer of gassy ice
  14. NASA’s New Horizons Team Publishes First Kuiper Belt Flyby Science Result
  15. What's for dinner?

    Meatball subs, tri-color pasta salad and fresh veggies, mixed fruit.
  16. I thought you left, Derek? In future, don't lie about that, either. It's another tinfoil checkbox ticked..... It's actually NOT a 'cardinal tenet'. It's just one of many aspects of decent science, and it depends on the event/thing being studied. If it was a 'requirement', then one time events, oh like a large meteorite strike or volcanic eruption on a particular geographical landscape, or even a pile of dust being blown onto a spacecraft's solar panels by an event (a cherry-picked one, ignoring other possibilities) would, according to your logic, be unproven and impossible.. Would you like me to give lots of other examples that do not require repeatability, but are nevertheless considered proven beyond doubt? You really don't work in the sciences, do you? Why would that be important, except to someone desperate for anything at all to support an otherwise unsupported scenario? Are you claiming that Baysinger deliberately did not repeat his verification, so as to allow the other missions to be faked? Do you not think that sounds a tad ridiculous? (but never mind, let's proceed down that path..). The thing is, that is not any sort of positive evidence for your tinfoil idiocy. It is simply evidence, amongst a HUGE collection of other evidence, all of which is consistent and well-documented, of Apollo 11 being as advertised. And you acknowledge they got to the moon and back successfully, on that first real try. So .... I guess NASA ran the other missions to provide the repeatability that was missing from Baysingers little contribution? Or for some as yet to be explained ebil nefarious purpose? I mean, that's the sort of dumbass logic you are applying. Look Derek, it's simple - we have plenty of evidence for ALL the missions. Evidence that I, and many others here, are very, very familiar with, from rocketry equations and orbital trajectories, to technical specifications, images and movies and tv transmissions, navigation processes, journals, blueprints, returned samples, later verifying images from the LRO, Japan's Selene, India's Chandrayaan and other independent sources. We've done the hard yards, investigated every denier's claim, and they have all fallen flat on their faces. And this thread? is full of nothing substantive whatsoever. If I've missed the substantive bit, please link me to that post - that will be the one where you posted something convincing and well-researched. Not more bloody handwaving. Thus far, you acknowledge that A11 happened, and your 'best evidence' (term used extremely loosely) that any mission or missions were faked is, wait for it... too much/little dust on Surveyor. And that is completely unsupported (indeed unsupportable) by any reasonable logic and you have (despite promising to do so) not provided a shred of a proper analysis. FTR, I completely reject that such an analysis could be usefully done, and if you ever have the cojones to provide one I'll be very happy to go through it and point out the holes. But Good Luck, anyway. ... OR, you now hint at some as yet secret evidence, to be released in July. Why July? And WTF didn't you start with your best evidence? If it's not cash you want, perhaps it's fame or ego from the interest you think you will get? Frankly I think I'd rather not be famous on the backs of the CT crowd. Antivaxxers, flat earthers, those are the folks you want to adore you, Derek? You want to make gullible even more stupid? And you've given nothing other than handwaves about the significance (or otherwise) of that. Do you honestly think that in any way supports your poop? What a daft attempt at an analogy! As above, Baysinger's efforts are simply another bit of reasonably hard evidence, amongst reams of other stuff, almost all of which is much more solid and 'better'. There's nothing there to 'pull apart', as Baysinger's claim is quite well documented, and it is supported by radio link budget calculations (which you didn't even check, did you?) and also others who listened in on other missions, like the Russians, duh..... The body of evidence for all the missions is and has always been unchallengable. If you think you have successfully challenged it, again, please point me to that post, as I see NOTHING here. BTW, I note you still don't understand the directionality of the signals coming from the moon, or at least don't have the guts to admit you got that wrong. Here, let me repeat - you CANNOT use an (orbiting or otherwise) spacecraft/satellite to emulate a lunar signal by 'relaying'. This is EASILY proven - THINK! Those huge radio dishes (why do you think they are so big?) MUST be pointed directly at the signal source - 240,000 miles away. The moon is of course a moving target, AND each radio dish hands over the signal to the next DSN dish as the moon orbits / earth turns ... so simple parallax comes into play. Every time that handover happened, those dishes were triangulating that signal to an undisputable location ON THE MOON. THINK. Please, Derek, try to be a scientist just once here. Email a real rocket scientist and ask them about this, and then be a brave little Derek and come back and acknowledge that you got that part completely and utterly wrong. Are you brave enough, or not? Do you ever learn, or not? Who cares what someone thinks? {/judgejudy} Just stop pussyfooting and post your countering evidence. And drop the lame personal incredulity - "Omigod, that's not the right amount of dust coz I say so."
  17. It is relevant, you said they told you you may be contacted, i am curious as to how you happen to have been told this. Where did it happen eg: round a dinner table? At a bus stop? Did they just walk up to you and say it in the street one day?. Or Did you go to see one?
  18. Given that the wall is leaning away from the collapsed stoned it is hard to see how some of those stones managed to fall so far away from it. Walls usually collapse in the direction in which they lean or they bulge and slump. It such circumstances the only force acting on the stones is gravity and they fall vertically under their own weight. It might be possible for them to roll if they were round in shape but these are not. The article does say 'that it is not clear whether the damage is caused by people climbing on the wall.'
  19. yes that is a fact weather there is an after life as i have said Time will tell.now i have had a very special experience which has without question changed my views on all of this . all i can say to you freetorome be a good person in your mortal life as i my now sure we will be judged in this life.but i do not know this for a fact.All i can say, there is powers out there and i am confident there is a right and a wrong.
  20. Psychic attack! Need help!

    no, i can feel the pressure throughout the day. but i can feel it best when i'm meditating
  21. DA: Derailers Anonymous Thread III

    I hope all goes well for you. I have been working a lot of hours so I'm only on UM off and on lately. Drop us a line here and there and let us know how you are doing. Good luck!
  22. it really is not irrelevant who because it was more the thought process which triggered my mind at the TIME which is relevant. All i did was remember what the spiritual person said.They probably all say that.
  23. Well Fukushima's already defecating into the Pacific, how much more harm could there really be anyway. I'd suggest learning to forego that tuna though. Just out of an abundance of caution. After all, we wouldn't want it to affect our own families now would we.
  24. "Ok to be gay" school lessons cause unrest

    You did misread that. What I did say was plain English and not rocket science.
  25. What do you think i "believe"? I do not think you have understood what i put. Ofcourse time is important, but my point is, during mans time on Earth, there has been no proof of an after life. Beliefs are not proof. Neither are people who have lost a loved one saying they have had a sign. If the "born, living and dying " cycle also consisted of an after life, then every single person would be able to witness it, nit just the believers. You do not need a medium, to confirm the birth of a baby or the life and death of a person, so why do some people go to them to see if they can make contact with the dead? If there really was an after life, there would not be 3 stages of the cycle of mans exsistance, there would be 4 and mediums would never have set up shop in the first place. You are born. You live. You die THOSE ARE FACTS. You go to an afterlife = BELIEF
  26. acute

    If you watch Real Life Crime shows, the vast majority of crimes are committed in Dade County, Cook County, Las Vegas, and Australia! :o

    1. Show previous comments  1 more
    2. acute


      Here in the civilized part of the world, policing is by consent.


      (10 second clip)


    3. Orphalesion


      And if you read crime novels, most crimes are committed in the Provence and in Greece.

    4. anton00


      Good to know, thanks!

  1. Load more activity