ships-cat Posted August 5, 2007 #176 Share Posted August 5, 2007 I think that this thread could make a h*** of a novella Anyone know Tom Clancy's number ? Or Dale Browns ? Meow Purr. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
questionmark Posted August 5, 2007 #177 Share Posted August 5, 2007 (edited) Anyone know Tom Clancy's number ? Or Dale Browns ? Meow Purr. Feel like writing it yourself? And yes, but I ain't telling. Edited August 5, 2007 by questionmark Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stellar Posted August 5, 2007 #178 Share Posted August 5, 2007 seriously though, heavy-lift helicopters only have a range of a few hundreds of miles. Where would they fly FROM to get to the Artic ? The guys from my unit that participated in the recent sovop in the arctic were flown out there in Griffons... Depending on where that plane supposedly crashed, it could very well be possible for a helicopter to get there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ships-cat Posted August 5, 2007 #179 Share Posted August 5, 2007 The guys from my unit that participated in the recent sovop in the arctic were flown out there in Griffons... Depending on where that plane supposedly crashed, it could very well be possible for a helicopter to get there. Jolly good. Are they capable of lifting (presumably heavy) lumps of crashed bomber onto a barge ? Meow Purr. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stellar Posted August 5, 2007 #180 Share Posted August 5, 2007 Jolly good. Are they capable of lifting (presumably heavy) lumps of crashed bomber onto a barge ? What are? Griffons, or Helicopters in general? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ships-cat Posted August 5, 2007 #181 Share Posted August 5, 2007 (edited) What are? Griffons, or Helicopters in general? I feel that your suggestion that the crashed Tu-160 bomber might be loaded onto the (civilian) barge (which is too small) by a flock of mythical eagle-lion hybrids is a ludicrous one Steller, and not in keeping with the serious discussion in this thread. <goes back and re-reads thread from beginning> Ooops - my mistake Steller ... eagle-lion hybrids it is ! Do they have stealth plasma ? Meow Purr. Edited August 5, 2007 by ships-cat Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lolki Posted August 5, 2007 #182 Share Posted August 5, 2007 a CH-146 can lift 5,355 kg max, however the mythological winged lion beast is capable of lifting a near infinite amount of weight due to its magic, obviously. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stellar Posted August 5, 2007 #183 Share Posted August 5, 2007 I feel that your suggestion that the crashed Tu-160 bomber might be loaded onto the (civilian) barge (which is too small) by a flock of mythical eagle-lion hybrids is a ludicrous one Steller, and not in keeping with the serious discussion in this thread. Im not suggesting anything of the sort, I'm correcting the information presented. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ships-cat Posted August 5, 2007 #184 Share Posted August 5, 2007 Im not suggesting anything of the sort, I'm correcting the information presented. Hee hee - I was pulling your leg Stellar - no offence was intended My point was that- considering some of the claims made in this thread (the Su-37/47, plasma stealth, a crashed - and hushed up - Tu-160 (one of only about 19 in active service)... a civilian barge... submarines... death rays... ), then a flock of mythical Lion-Eagle hybrid animals fits right in Meow Purr. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lolki Posted August 5, 2007 #185 Share Posted August 5, 2007 Plus whos ever saying this happend on a very public forum would get put in prison for a rather long time for violating all kinds of military and government confidentiality agreements and official secrets acts they signed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ships-cat Posted August 5, 2007 #186 Share Posted August 5, 2007 (edited) Plus whos ever saying this happend on a very public forum would get put in prison for a rather long time for violating all kinds of military and government confidentiality agreements and official secrets acts they signed. Astutely put Lolki... another poster has already mentioned this very point. The entire thing is bull. Except... except... do we REALLY know what is going on up there on the roof of the world ? I've been cynical and snide about Canrocks claims. The Su-37/47 thing is OBVIOUSLY ficticious. ..and yet.... apropos of nothing... a silly story... I remembe reading the story of an RAF pilot, flying an English Electric Lightning (the fastest and highest fighter in the world at the time), cruising over UK airspace and just tootling along. He suddenly became aware of a WIERD looking aircraft very close to him... like nothing he'd ever seen... it looked like something out of Thunderbirds. He challanged it over radio.. suddenly it accelerated away. "Hah" he thought, "NOBODY gets away from the Lightning".. so he went up to Mach 2 and followed... and was dismayed as this wierd black aircraft effortlessly shot off.. going both massivly faster and higher than he could. He later estimated it's speed as in excess of Mach 3 (impossible), had climbed beyond 70,000 feet (inconceivable) and specificly mentioned the odd contrails/afterburner effects that the plane had. (unlikely) He was - eventually - cashiered out of the RAF for refusing to back down on his story. (His commanders where embarresed, thinking he'd "seen" a UFO). It was only MANY years later that the US admitted the existence of the SR-71. So lets wait and see Meow Purr. Edited August 5, 2007 by ships-cat Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
questionmark Posted August 5, 2007 #187 Share Posted August 5, 2007 The entire thing is bull. But it was fun while it lasted... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canrock Posted August 5, 2007 Author #188 Share Posted August 5, 2007 They will be using a heavy lift bird like a S-64 aircrane or Chinook for recovery. Most likely from companies lke CAC or Colheli which are under military contract already. To the idiot....about the space on the Barge. Listen moron, they will be recovery engines, cockpit, and pieces, not an entire 150+ foot aircraft. Their is a potential problem of landing a heavy lift helicopter on the barge deck.... which was designed for a medium lift.... such as S61, CH-46 or Kamov. But supposedly VIH Helilogging beefed up the landing deck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ships-cat Posted August 6, 2007 #189 Share Posted August 6, 2007 To the idiot....about the space on the Barge. Listen moron, they will be recovery engines, cockpit, and pieces, not an entire 150+ foot aircraft. Does he mean me ? How Wude They will be using a heavy lift bird like a S-64 aircrane or Chinook for recovery. Most likely from companies lke CAC or Colheli which are under military contract already. They certainly will not be using an S-64: it has an operating range of only 200nm. Where are you suggesting it would fly from ? The Chinook MIGHT be a contender, as it has a range over over 1000nm.. however... surely they'd be afraid of it being shot down by that rampaging Su-37/47 ? Their is a potential problem of landing a heavy lift helicopter on the barge deck.... which was designed for a medium lift.... such as S61, CH-46 or Kamov. But supposedly VIH Helilogging beefed up the landing deck. Why would they want to land on the barge deck ? Surely they're merely dropping bits of broken Tu-160 onto the barge deck ? Soooooo - when is the 'missing Tu160' story going to hit the headlines Canrock ? Meow Purr. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Umbarger Posted August 6, 2007 #190 Share Posted August 6, 2007 Once again, I thought that we were all in agreement that this whole thing was a hoax? If the Russians lost a bomber in the ocean near the coast of the U.K., I'm sure that there would be a lot more of a stink over it. The idea that they might have been testing the responce time of the Brits is not shocking. They used to do that over the Berring Strait all the time back inthe 1980's. That a Russian plane fell into the ocean would not be all that shocking either. That there is no major news coverage of the incident, now that is astounding. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ships-cat Posted August 6, 2007 #191 Share Posted August 6, 2007 Once again, I thought that we were all in agreement that this whole thing was a hoax? If the Russians lost a bomber in the ocean near the coast of the U.K., I'm sure that there would be a lot more of a stink over it. The idea that they might have been testing the responce time of the Brits is not shocking. They used to do that over the Berring Strait all the time back inthe 1980's. That a Russian plane fell into the ocean would not be all that shocking either. That there is no major news coverage of the incident, now that is astounding. You're right M'Lord... but... somehow this topic is addictive. It's like an itchy scab... you KNOW you'll make it worse if you respond, and yet at the same time you can't help yourself. 99% of me says that Canrock is delusional. But then... he writes such amusing delusions. Truly, we have the basis of a Tom Clancy novel here. (The final conflict between the US and Russia - the struggle for Resources in the Artic). You must admit, it is a heady and potentialy fruitfull theme for a book. Canrock merely needs to research his military technology a bit more before he posts. 1% of me says... we've been fooled before, and had the wool pulled over our eyes. Who KNOWS what is really happening up their on the roof of the world ? So I would encourage Canrock to keep on posting, providing that he doesn't mind me attempting to "rubbish" his posts. And how would you feel M'lord Umbarger - how would we ALL feel - if we read about the loss/recovery of a Tu-160 in 8 days time ? The wider UM forum IS about the unlikely, unplottable and ineffable. Lets wait and see Meow Purr. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
contactismade Posted August 7, 2007 #192 Share Posted August 7, 2007 (edited) Who knows whats happening up here?.......i knows thats who knows. Because I unlike Canrock , obviously, live up here in the north he lives in cold lake, which is alberta and not really the north. Ask stellar. Edited August 7, 2007 by contactismade Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
princessarra Posted August 8, 2007 #193 Share Posted August 8, 2007 Thats a joke....... the Russians don't have any money to afford things like feed their own people so how thne hell are they going to afford things like rockets ??? Lets face it.....the form er Soviet Union is that broke noone tkes them seriously anymore. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stardrive Posted August 8, 2007 #194 Share Posted August 8, 2007 99% of me says that Canrock is delusional. But then... he writes such amusing delusions. Truly, we have the basis of a Tom Clancy novel here. (The final conflict between the US and Russia - the struggle for Resources in the Artic). You must admit, it is a heady and potentialy fruitfull theme for a book. You may be on to something there ships-cat. If a screenwriter in Hollywood got a hold of this concept it could be next summers blockbuster movie. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
truthorder Posted August 8, 2007 #195 Share Posted August 8, 2007 Thats a joke....... the Russians don't have any money to afford things like feed their own people so how thne hell are they going to afford things like rockets ??? Lets face it.....the form er Soviet Union is that broke noone tkes them seriously anymore. Are you trying to suggest that when the USSR broke apart that the rockets broke apart with it? Just because a major country dissolves does not mean its technology and warfare weaponry have dissolved along with it. If common sense doesn't teach that, history sure as hell does. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeffryw Posted August 8, 2007 #196 Share Posted August 8, 2007 The Russians may try and detonate a nuclear bomb in the arctic. This will destroy the world. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ships-cat Posted August 8, 2007 #197 Share Posted August 8, 2007 The Russians may try and detonate a nuclear bomb in the arctic. This will destroy the world. Huh ? Shades of "Dr Strangelove" here. A nuke detonated in the Artic would suggest destroy a few lumps of ice. Meow Purr. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canrock Posted August 9, 2007 Author #198 Share Posted August 9, 2007 Prime Minister Harper is heading north to inspect the recovered wreckage. Supposedly he has some big announcements coming shortly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canrock Posted August 9, 2007 Author #199 Share Posted August 9, 2007 http://www.cbc.ca/cp/national/070808/n080852A.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ships-cat Posted August 9, 2007 #200 Share Posted August 9, 2007 Prime Minister Harper is heading north to inspect the recovered wreckage. Supposedly he has some big announcements coming shortly. http://www.cbc.ca/cp/national/070808/n080852A.html OooooKaaaay.... The PM is going to visit a national park, and also make some statements about Canadian artic sovereignty, which may include some statements about military matters. The latter is not necessarily sinister: after all, Canada IS in the middle of a large (for them) military/coast guard/RCMP excercise on/around Baffin Island. We shall see Meow Purr. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now