Jump to content
Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -
Magnatude

100 reasons why Creationism/Evolution is stup

52 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

Magnatude

I found 2 links to these documentaries online

100 Reasons Why Creationism Is Stupid!

http://www.tv-links.co.uk/listings/9/6169

100 Reasons Why Evolution Is Stupid!

http://www.tv-links.co.uk/listings/9/5566

Personally I find both extremists of their own views, watch, listen, you be the judge.

Edited by Magnatude

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Paranoid Android

Mind sharing what those links are, Magnatude?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The Puzzler

What troubles me about evolution is this:

"If pressed about man's ancestry, I would have to unequivocally say that all we have is a huge question mark. To date, there has been nothing found to truthfully purport as a transitional species to man, including Lucy, since 1470 was as old and probably older. If further pressed, I would have to state that there is more evidence to suggest an abrupt arrival of man rather than a gradual process of evolving."

Richard Leakey, the world foremost paleo-anthopologist said this. If Richard Leakey has a huge question mark over the whole evolution of man why shouldn't I?

Edited by weareallsuckers

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
EmpressV

I find it much easier to comprehend the evolvement of everything over time than to believe some guy in the sky created things from mud. We see evolution every day in almost everything we do and everything that is. Everyone can see that but not everyone and more likely no one ever sees this god character. Except for those that create it within their own mind.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
armegon

Best is crevolution then :):lol:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
EmpressV
Best is crevolution then :):lol:

Or possibly Evolation :yes::tu:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The Puzzler

What about neither? Raelianism anyone?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
EmpressV
What about neither? Raelianism anyone?

Anything is possible, right?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The Puzzler
Anything is possible, right?

lol, nearly anything, I'm not quite as confident as Brave on that one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
questionmark
links:

100 Reasons Why Creationism Is Stupid! (2 documentaries)

http://www.tv-links.co.uk/listings/9/6169

100 Reasons Why Evolution Is Stupid!

http://www.tv-links.co.uk/listings/9/5566

Wow, and such a neutral speaker....

The fifth sentence : The Bible is infallible...

Wonderful. And Soooo believable.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
character

not compeling evidence, but awsome fun :lol:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
questionmark
not compeling evidence, but awsome fun :lol:

yep, stand-up comedy at its best.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Atheist God
What troubles me about evolution is this:

"If pressed about man's ancestry, I would have to unequivocally say that all we have is a huge question mark. To date, there has been nothing found to truthfully purport as a transitional species to man, including Lucy, since 1470 was as old and probably older. If further pressed, I would have to state that there is more evidence to suggest an abrupt arrival of man rather than a gradual process of evolving."

Richard Leakey, the world foremost paleo-anthopologist said this. If Richard Leakey has a huge question mark over the whole evolution of man why shouldn't I?

Evolution is a gradual change and there is lots of evidence to support that we humans also evolved from earlier primates including fossils in which human evolution is observed.

As for Leakey he is right and wrong humans had shown up in Africa first then quickly spread to other parts of the world in our early development. We spread around Asia, Africa and Europe within a short amount of time already inhabited by our predecessors the Neanderthal whom in my opinion went extinct because they could not compete against a more advanced species.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Cradle of Fish
What about neither? Raelianism anyone?

I think that would still count as creationism. It's not just christians pushing the idea you know.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Magnatude

I found both to be interesting, if not in fact or nonsense, they both told their tales and did it convincingly.

I found Dawkins to be more on anti-religion than proving Evolution theories.

Wish, he could have had more on Evolution.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
questionmark
Neanderthal whom in my opinion went extinct because they could not compete against a more advanced species.

Not exactly, the Neanderthal was perfectly adapted to his surroundings. Once the climate changed abruptly from the ice age to temperate he could not adapt fast enough and died out.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
KBA
What troubles me about evolution is this:

"If pressed about man's ancestry, I would have to unequivocally say that all we have is a huge question mark. To date, there has been nothing found to truthfully purport as a transitional species to man, including Lucy, since 1470 was as old and probably older. If further pressed, I would have to state that there is more evidence to suggest an abrupt arrival of man rather than a gradual process of evolving."

Richard Leakey, the world foremost paleo-anthopologist said this. If Richard Leakey has a huge question mark over the whole evolution of man why shouldn't I?

Appeal to authority. :sleepy:

You throw out a load of perfectly good evidence and arguments of a multitude of brilliant minds because of one man's opinion.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
WalkingWithFire
I think that would still count as creationism. It's not just christians pushing the idea you know.

It's not just an "idea". It's a truth that has been passed down since the beginning of time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beckys_Mom
It's not just an "idea". It's a truth that has been passed down since the beginning of time.

Yes you are correct..it is thr truth to all of you that follow the bible and believe it to be the truth...but for the rest of us..its not :D

EDIT who on earth wrote stuff down from the beginning of time??

Edited by Beckys_Mom

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
questionmark
Yes you are correct..it is thr truth to all of you that follow the bible and believe it to be the truth...but for the rest of us..its not :D

EDIT who on earth wrote stuff down from the beginning of time??

The official keeper of records since the beginning of time?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beckys_Mom
The official keeper of records since the beginning of time?

LOL and who would that have been??

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
questionmark
LOL and who would that have been??

That is the secret of the ........ (fill in blanks), after all they invented him/her.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beckys_Mom
That is the secret of the ........ (fill in blanks), after all they invented him/her.

The secret of the...................man that had a funny dream?? LOL

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
questionmark
The secret of the...................man that had a funny dream?? LOL

I didn't want to be that scathing but :tu:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.