Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

"Strange" British Fossil Is Part of New Dino

4 posts in this topic

"Strange" British Fossil Is Part of New Dino Family

A forgotten museum fossil that had been gathering dust for more than a century is actually from a mysterious British dinosaur that represents an entirely new family, scientists have discovered.

The newly revealed herbivore was identified from a fragment of backbone stored at the Natural History Museum in London since the 1890s.

The fossil laid unnoticed until 2006, when it was chanced upon by visiting dinosaur researcher Mike Taylor from the University of Portsmouth in England.

The museum specimen "leapt out at me as being different," said Taylor, a postdoctoral student whose dinosaur studies focus on giant, long-necked herbivores known as sauropods.

Having spent the previous five years "doing nothing but looking at sauropod vertebrae," he immediately realized the half-complete fossil bone was "something strange," Taylor said.

"It was unmistakably a dorsal vertebra from a sauropod, but it didn't look like any dorsal vertebrae I'd ever seen before."

Investigation of the foot-tall (30-centimeter-tall) fossil subsequently revealed an unknown species that lived some 140 million years ago, according to findings published in the current issue of Palaeontology, the journal of Britain's Palaeontological Association.

The newly named Xenoposeidon proneneukus was likely typical for a sauropod, with a huge body, long neck, and stout legs. But its many unusual spinal features puts it in a new family of dinosaurs, the study says.

"Shockingly Strange"

The study was co-authored by University of Portsmouth paleontologist Darren Naish, who Taylor turned to for assistance in identifying his museum find.

"The fossil is not just a little bit different from the vertebrae of other types of sauropod—it's shockingly strange," Naish said.

"Based on this one bone, Xenoposeidon has more unique features than do other sauropods that are known from almost complete skeletons," he added. "That's how strange it is."

Features of the fossil link the plant-eater to well-known giant sauropods such as Diplodocus from North America and Brachiosaurus from Africa. (Related pictures: Dino With "Vacuum Mouth" Revealed [November 15, 2007].)

"But you should imagine it as representing some other additional lineage in this major group, which we didn't know about at all," Naish said.

Getting an accurate picture of what Xenoposeidon looked like from a single piece of backbone is impossible, the researcher admitted.

"You can't tell from the shape of the vertebra whether it was a long, low animal like Diplodocus, or whether it was an altogether shorter, stockier animal like Brachiosaurus," Naish said.

If built like a brachiosaur, the dinosaur would have measured some 15 meters (50 feet) long and weighed 7.6 tons, the researchers estimated.

If instead it resembled more lightly framed diplodocoids, Xenoposeidon would have stretched 20 meters (66 feet) nose to tail and weighed about 2.8 tons, the study said.

More Finds to Come?

Fossil collector Philip James Rufford originally discovered the odd vertebra in the early 1890s near Hastings in southeast England.

The fossil was briefly reviewed by paleontologists, then hidden away for 113 years at the Natural History Museum.

Researchers don't know whether other remains of the fossil creature survived, since the museum didn't keep a record of the exact location of the find.

That's not uncommon, Naish said. Hundreds of dinosaurs and other long-extinct animals are known from a single fossil specimen. (Related: "New Species of Ancient Sea Creature Discovered—Under Ping-Pong Table" [september 29, 2006].)

But attaching a name to the newly described sauropod bone should increase the chances of future Xenoposeidon discoveries.

"Hopefully this will mean that other sauropod experts will know what to look for, and they will have this [fossil] in mind when they look at other unusual vertebrae," Naish said.

As many new dinosaur species are described from museum fossil collections as from freshly unearthed specimens, he pointed out.

"There are paleontologists who say, If you want to find new species, don't go out in the field, just go and look at old collections," Naish added.

Natural History Museum dinosaur researcher Paul Barrett said in a statement that the museum's fossil collection contains thousands of dinosaur specimens, which are studied by researchers from all over the world.

"Because of their work," he added, "dinosaur bones are being constantly reassessed, and our collections still offer us lots of surprises."

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

I makes me wonder how many fossils were destroyed or forgotten because people didn't have a clue what they really were.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

The bracing inside the vertebra indicates tremendous strength, yet note that the bracing is parallel to the vertrebre, not perpendicular, as is more common in sauropods. Who knows what this creature really looked like?

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's amazing what you find when you scrounge around a bit...

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.