Truth666 Posted October 4, 2008 #1 Share Posted October 4, 2008 October satanic celebrations: launch of Obama impeachment scheduled for ... Celebration (1) of “OJ Simpson not guilty”, one of the milestones of the final leg, staged 13 years later to the day as reversed (2) repetition, i.e. guilty, October 3. Celebration of launch of “Clinton impeachement to be finally acquited”, another of the milestones of the final leg, staged 10 years later to the day as reversed repetition, i.e. launch of “Obama impeached asks his crowd to elect Clinton”. (3) Notes (1) Satanic celebrations ever since the illuminati target date, 1998, short before the battle of Armageddon begun, were explained in advance always by one and the same... Google as usual knows it. http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=M...ic+celebrations Make sure you don't miss this one: http://satanic-celebrations.blogspot.com/ (2) Illuminati religion requires reversed scripts. The very last of them, again, was explained by one and the same... http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=M...ott+MATT+24%3A6 (3) The comeback kid script, again, was explained by one and the same. All of it long ago. http://last-antichrist.blogspot.com/2007/0...ummies-two.html http://end-times-data.blogspot.com/2008/02...n-horrible.html http://end-times-prophet.blogspot.com/2008...on-will-be.html http://end-times-computers.blogspot.com/20...ckobamacom.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Plainbob13 Posted October 4, 2008 #2 Share Posted October 4, 2008 WOW! Thats all i can say on this one. Well there is more but I'd get banned. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Splodgenessabounds Posted October 4, 2008 #3 Share Posted October 4, 2008 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
InHuman Posted October 4, 2008 #4 Share Posted October 4, 2008 I'm lost. There's a timeline in there SOMEWHERE trying to explain it but I have NO idea. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
questionmark Posted October 4, 2008 #5 Share Posted October 4, 2008 don't ask...will be moved to the conspiracy section shortly... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pinky Floyd Posted October 5, 2008 #6 Share Posted October 5, 2008 Truth666 I visited all of the links that you supplied and I really cannot make head nor tails of what you are trying to point out.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SilverCougar Posted October 5, 2008 #7 Share Posted October 5, 2008 Pretty much... This is even way to far out there.. even for the run of the mill conspiracies.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.AKUMA. Posted October 5, 2008 #8 Share Posted October 5, 2008 all i figured out is this has something to do with the illuminati, should be in the conspiricey section. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nickoli Posted October 5, 2008 #9 Share Posted October 5, 2008 And I was accused of circular logic! This mm is lost and his rantings are unprovable rediculious postings of a psycological disorder of some sort. What drivel, dont waste your time, worthless post that makes absolutely no sense. Someone should tell Matt that the story ends with Saten being cast into a lake of fire for eternity,LOL. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Truth666 Posted October 5, 2008 Author #10 Share Posted October 5, 2008 Choose the date October 5, 1998 The House Judiciary Committee votes to launch a congressional impeachment inquiry against President Clinton. October 8, 1998 The House of Representatives vote for impeachment proceedings to begin against Clinton. The House judiciary committee will be given wide powers to draw up detailed charges against Mr Clinton, based on 11 allegations by the independent counsel Kenneth Starr in his report on the Monica Lewinsky affair. October 14, 1998 The House judiciary committee chairman Henry Hyde announces the impeachment inquiry will concentrate its focus on two core charges: that Mr Clinton lied under oath and attempted to obstruct justice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
InHuman Posted October 5, 2008 #11 Share Posted October 5, 2008 OMG! EVERYTHING HAPPENED - and is HAPPENING in OCTOBER! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pendora Posted October 5, 2008 #12 Share Posted October 5, 2008 I've read some outrageous threads on this forum...but this takes the cake for today. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MARAB0D Posted October 5, 2008 #13 Share Posted October 5, 2008 There are, however repetitions! Say, on Monday October 06 2008 I gonna have breakfast and go to work - same as I did in October 1988! I need to think on this... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Truth666 Posted October 6, 2008 Author #14 Share Posted October 6, 2008 I'm lost. There's a timeline in there SOMEWHERE trying to explain it but I have NO idea. The connection between O.J. Simpson, the Clintons and Barak Obama is completely explained. The only thing that is not FULLY explicitly explained is what exactly the final leg is. As explained in the links, it is the final leg of the road 666, i.e. the path that ends with the formal acceptance of the mark of the beast, November 2, 2004. Again: - sheep accepting the “OJ Simpson not guilty after murdering” illuminati script was one of the milestones of the final leg; - sheep accepting the “Clinton acquited after lying under oath” illuminati script was one of the milestones of the final leg. October 2008, the illuminati celebrate these milestones to the day, by staging the reversed repetition of those milestones: - “OJ Simpson guilty of robbery”, 13 years to the day; - launch of “Obama impeachment" endig with Obama guilty and Clinton "elected", 10 years to the day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Skeptic Eric Raven Posted October 6, 2008 #15 Share Posted October 6, 2008 (edited) Conspiracy section. Nothing real about this rubbish. Edited October 6, 2008 by The Skeptic Eric Raven Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlindMessiah Posted October 6, 2008 #16 Share Posted October 6, 2008 Pretty much... This is even way to far out there.. even for the run of the mill conspiracies.. I hate posts like this. I'm a "conspiracy theorist" and people like this are embarrassing to say the least. As for the OP, this fits into his belief that Hillary Clinton is going to be president. How exactly does a candidate get impeached? O wait, they don't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Space Commander Travis Posted October 6, 2008 #17 Share Posted October 6, 2008 Choose the date October 14, 1998 The House judiciary committee chairman Henry Hyde announces the impeachment inquiry will concentrate its focus on two core charges: that Mr Clinton lied under oath and attempted to obstruct justice. !!!!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
*Quinn* Posted October 7, 2008 #18 Share Posted October 7, 2008 October 2008, the illuminati celebrate these milestones to the day, by staging the reversed repetition of those milestones: - “OJ Simpson guilty of robbery”, 13 years to the day; - launch of “Obama impeachment" ending with Obama guilty and Clinton "elected", 10 years to the day. Ok... so when is this "Obama Impeachment" agenda supposed to get under way? Also, after following some of your links, who in the world is Matt Marriott? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Czero 101 Posted October 7, 2008 #19 Share Posted October 7, 2008 How exactly does a candidate get impeached? O wait, they don't. Since Obama is still a senator, he can be impeached. Whether he would be is another question altogether. Cz Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MID Posted October 7, 2008 #20 Share Posted October 7, 2008 Since Obama is still a senator, he can be impeached. Whether he would be is another question altogether. Cz I rather doubt that the House, under Pelosi, could find any grounds upon which to proceed (why would she??? It would end a career that is likely already shortened by her conduct). Generally speaking, each house has the authority to expel its own members and that would tend to take authority over impeachment articles (as they've never actually succeeded in practice), and the Senate...populated by leaderslike Kennedy, Reid, Kerry, Et. Al...are going to dismiss their God Obama??? Nah...not happening. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NumberOneSon Posted October 8, 2008 #21 Share Posted October 8, 2008 I rather doubt that the House, under Pelosi, could find any grounds upon which to proceed (why would she??? It would end a career that is likely already shortened by her conduct). Generally speaking, each house has the authority to expel its own members and that would tend to take authority over impeachment articles (as they've never actually succeeded in practice), and the Senate...populated by leaderslike Kennedy, Reid, Kerry, Et. Al...are going to dismiss their God Obama??? Right. Why would any Democrat, including Clinton, want to bring impeachment charges against their presidential candidate less than a month away from the general election? That would spell political suicide for the Democratic party. If putting Clinton in the White House was the master plan of the Illuminati (as the links suggest), then why wouldn't Obama have been impeached before the January primaries? Senatorial impeachment proceedings for Obama only 27 days before the election would instantly tear the Democratic party apart and practically hand deliver the presidential election to McCain on a silver platter. The whole scenario may have seemed viable back in 2007 or early 2008, back when those web articles were written, but with 27 days left? Not so much. NumberOneSon Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Truth666 Posted October 8, 2008 Author #22 Share Posted October 8, 2008 (edited) Why would any Democrat, including Clinton, want to bring impeachment charges against their presidential candidate less than a month away from the general election? ... If putting Clinton in the White House was the master plan of the Illuminati (as the links suggest), then why wouldn't Obama have been impeached before the January primaries? Senatorial impeachment proceedings for Obama only 27 days before the election would instantly tear the Democratic party apart and practically hand deliver the presidential election to McCain on a silver platter. NumberOneSon NumberOneSon, you illustrate how totally brainwashed read the truth, and yet are totally unable to get the absolute basics. Reminder - the basics, found everywhere in the Prophet's pages: - Democratic and Republican parties, exactly like all mass media, are controlled by the illuminati. They will do their role to "elect" whoever the illuminati script has as the next president. - they don't need to care about who actually people vote for, since the winner's name is already part of the source code running on the voting machines software. - Clinton is supported by about 5 pct of the population, so an Obama role is required to let the masses swallow the script, and in particular, considering that McCain's support is 1 pct, to have some people standing in front of the voting machines the "election" day. Edited October 8, 2008 by Truth666 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ravergirl Posted October 8, 2008 #23 Share Posted October 8, 2008 A little early. election isn't over. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlindMessiah Posted October 8, 2008 #24 Share Posted October 8, 2008 NumberOneSon, you illustrate how totally brainwashed read the truth, and yet are totally unable to get the absolute basics. Reminder - the basics, found everywhere in the Prophet's pages: - Democratic and Republican parties, exactly like all mass media, are controlled by the illuminati. They will do their role to "elect" whoever the illuminati script has as the next president. - they don't need to care about who actually people vote for, since the winner's name is already part of the source code running on the voting machines software. Ya we got it. We're brainwashed simpletons. - Clinton is supported by about 5 pct of the population, so an Obama role is required to let the masses swallow the script, and in particular, considering that McCain's support is 1 pct, to have some people standing in front of the voting machines the "election" day. This is factually wrong. Hillary Clinton is supported by more than 5 percent. She received a little under 7 percent support in the primaries and would receive a much higher percentage in a general election. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Truth666 Posted October 8, 2008 Author #25 Share Posted October 8, 2008 Hillary Clinton is supported by more than 5 percent. She received a little under 7 percent support in the primaries... Blind, if you read again the basics you will conclude that the programmers of the voting machines in the Republican primaries are part of the same programming team that programmed the voting machines in the Democratic primaries. Again the same programmers who wrote the decisive lines of code for the November 4 elections. Check out again the laws of End Times Reductionism, stated by Prophet. After it should be clear that nothing (from the size of the programming team mentioned above to the amount of lines of code that need to be changed each time) escapes these laws. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts