Jump to content
Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -
Sign in to follow this  
SQLserver

Every Single 2008 Nobel Laureate

65 posts in this topic

Recommended Posts

SoCrazes
As you can see, their best candidate that is brilliant, insightful, wise, great hope can't even beat the Dumb, cluless, stupid Bush. :lol:

Sounds as though you're one of the few that want another 4 more years of "near tyranny."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
questionmark
As you can see, their best candidate that is brilliant, insightful, wise, great hope can't even beat the Dumb, cluless, stupid Bush. :lol:

Just seez something about the electorate at large.... but then again...what do we expect?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
AROCES
Correct me if I'm wrong but neither Bush or McCain were exactly top of their class as far as I know. Plus having a university education, even an Ivy League one, is not a guarantee of intellect...this, however, applies to both dems and reps. And I have to say, Bush doesn't exactly come off as a bright fella, and Obama does come off more insightful and articulate than McCain.

Obama is a very good speaker, no one can deny that. But you have to listen to what he is saying not just the way he says things.

Spread the wealth around??? A Hugo Chavez mentality.

And regarding Nobel laureates...I think it's safe to say most of the laureates are fairly smart people. I wonder why all these smart people have decided to endorse Obama.......

For most of the Laureates got there with govt funding or assistance on their achievements.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
AROCES
Sounds as though you're one of the few that want another 4 more years of "near tyranny."

Near Tyranny? In what way???

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
AROCES
Just seez something about the electorate at large.... but then again...what do we expect?

All you had come up with was Gore and Kerry, so don't blame the electorate.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
BlindMessiah
And regarding Nobel laureates...I think it's safe to say most of the laureates are fairly smart people. I wonder why all these smart people have decided to endorse Obama.......

They're democrats?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
questionmark
All you had come up with was Gore and Kerry, so don't blame the electorate.

Let me repeat it again: I was trying to find a Republican who was not a bigot and did not finish in the last 8th of his class, if the party can't nominate one of those I rather vote for a smart Democrat than an idiot.

Clear enough?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Clocker
Obama is a very good speaker, no one can deny that. But you have to listen to what he is saying not just the way he says things.

Spread the wealth around??? A Hugo Chavez mentality.

For most of the Laureates got there with govt funding or assistance on their achievements.

Well, I like a good part of what he says, though not everything of course. And McCain seems a little too aggressive for my liking anyway.

True enough, but then again I don't know of great many scientists who don't get funding for whatever they study :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Clocker
They're democrats?

I'd be surprised if they were since a good part of them, if not most, are not American.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
BlindMessiah
I'd be surprised if they were since a good part of them, if not most, are not American.

Haha... so some people on this forum expect the US population to vote for a candidate because foreign elites like him?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Clocker
Haha... so some people on this forum expect the US population to vote for a candidate because foreign elites like him?

Well I don't know about that...but there's no denying these foreign elites are intelligent. Well, in their own fields anyway...who knows what they know about politics or economics. Not much probably. Well, excluding Paul Krugman of course. But it does sound nice, that NOBEL LAUREATES support Obama, doesn't it? ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
BlindMessiah
Well I don't know about that...but there's no denying these foreign elites are intelligent. Well, in their own fields anyway...who knows what they know about politics or economics. Not much probably. Well, excluding Paul Krugman of course. But it does sound nice, that NOBEL LAUREATES support Obama, doesn't it? ;)

Of course they're intelligent, but as you say, in their fields. But the very fact that they're foreign implies that US interests are not their concern. It's ours.

Edited by BlindMessiah

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
AROCES
Let me repeat it again: I was trying to find a Republican who was not a bigot and did not finish in the last 8th of his class, if the party can't nominate one of those I rather vote for a smart Democrat than an idiot.

Clear enough?

What is so smart about a democrat who promises to take money from someone and redistrubute it for fairness? Really, what makes one so smart about it???????????

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
AROCES
I'd be surprised if they were since a good part of them, if not most, are not American.

Liberals and Socialist?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
questionmark
What is so smart about a democrat who promises to take money from someone and redistrubute it for fairness? Really, what makes one so smart about it???????????

No idea, but I know that the Republican party is run by so many under-performers that no matter where they grab they have a hand full of ****...see Joe the Plumber as a recent example.

And now it is not about redistribution (as you would like) it is about paying what we did not in the last 8 years.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
BlindMessiah
Liberals and Socialist?

Nobel Laureates smart ***.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
AROCES
No idea, but I know that the Republican party is run by so many under-performers that no matter where they grab they have a hand full of ****...see Joe the Plumber as a recent example.

And now it is not about redistribution (as you would like) it is about paying what we did not in the last 8 years.

Nope, Obama on tape and video said it to Joe Plumber himself.

He will spread the wealth around.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Clocker
Of course they're intelligent, but as you say, in their fields. But the very fact that they're foreign implies that US interests are not their concern. It's ours.

Agreed. I was just pointing out that their endorsement was something the media just couldn't resist taking advantage of. The media leaning towards Obama at least.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
SoCrazes
Near Tyranny? In what way???

GW did say something to the effect, "Quit throwing that GD Constitution in my face, its just a piece of paper!" after his advisors warned him of his actions against the country....Tyranny?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
SoCrazes
Nope, Obama on tape and video said it to Joe Plumber himself.

He will spread the wealth around.

I believe he was referring to how the tax laws currently favor the wealthy and how he was going to balance the tax codes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
AROCES
GW did say something to the effect, "Quit throwing that GD Constitution in my face, its just a piece of paper!" after his advisors warned him of his actions against the country....Tyranny?

Then why is the present congress not doing anything about it? so who is to blame?

Or maybe you just think he is out of bitterness.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
SoCrazes
As anyone besides me noticed that in the last 3 elections (including the current one) the Democrat nominee is annointed "brilliant", "insightful", "wise", the great "hope" etc while the Republican nominee is said to be "dumb", "stupid", "clueless", just got there by accident etc? Even though typically both candidates attended the same or similar Ivy League schools, got similar grades, etc?

The past is the past. In the near future I see that BHO gets well over 300 electoral votes? How brilliant!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
SoCrazes
Then why is the present congress not doing anything about it? so who is to blame?

Or maybe you just think he is out of bitterness.

That is my question as well. They're all (Pubs and Dems) attempting to drive a bi-partisan stake through this country why their stealing us blind. Parties are for aesthetics, the real crap we don't see.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
BlindMessiah
GW did say something to the effect, "Quit throwing that GD Constitution in my face, its just a piece of paper!" after his advisors warned him of his actions against the country....Tyranny?

I'm almost positive that is a disproven myth.

That is my question as well. They're all (Pubs and Dems) attempting to drive a bi-partisan stake through this country why their stealing us blind. Parties are for aesthetics, the real crap we don't see.

So true.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
AROCES
I believe he was referring to how the tax laws currently favor the wealthy and how he was going to balance the tax codes.

How does a tax law favors the rich when they are already in a higher bracket?

You make $20,000.00 you pay $2000.00 in taxes or even less.

You make $200,000.00 you pay $60,000.00 in taxes. $58,000 more than the other guy.

Now show me where the inbalance and unfairness is????

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.