jaylemurph Posted February 23, 2009 #251 Share Posted February 23, 2009 Blasphemer! Heretic! You will burn forever in the fires of Hades or will be locked into a small room for all of eternity with Piazzi Smyth, John Taylor, Zecharia Sitchin, Graham Hancock, and Michael Jackson. It's your choice. Which eternal damnation would be worst? *dries eyes after laughing If only it were for such as this that /I/ was going to hell. On the bright side, at least the conversation in hell will be good. Heaven only knows what the saint will discuss. --Jaylemurph Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kmt_sesh Posted February 24, 2009 #252 Share Posted February 24, 2009 *dries eyes after laughing If only it were for such as this that /I/ was going to hell. On the bright side, at least the conversation in hell will be good. Heaven only knows what the saint will discuss. --Jaylemurph Well, you and cormac can share a fire pit down there. He'll bring the marhsmallows and you gather the sticks. And seeing as how I'll probably be joining you heathen sinners, I'll bring the beer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
legionromanes Posted February 24, 2009 #253 Share Posted February 24, 2009 Well, you and cormac can share a fire pit down there. He'll bring the marhsmallows and you gather the sticks. And seeing as how I'll probably be joining you heathen sinners, I'll bring the beer. wait............... who's bringing the women ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cormac mac airt Posted February 24, 2009 #254 Share Posted February 24, 2009 Well, you and cormac can share a fire pit down there. He'll bring the marhsmallows and you gather the sticks. And seeing as how I'll probably be joining you heathen sinners, I'll bring the beer. Never much cared for beer, but if you could manage some Alabama Slammers it's a deal. To legionromanes: You are, buddy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
legionromanes Posted February 24, 2009 #255 Share Posted February 24, 2009 (edited) K I'll go phone Rockbiatch Edited February 24, 2009 by legionromanes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaylemurph Posted February 24, 2009 #256 Share Posted February 24, 2009 wait............... who's bringing the women ? I think it's in everyone's best interests if I don't. --Jaylemurph Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cormac mac airt Posted February 24, 2009 #257 Share Posted February 24, 2009 K I'll go phone Rockbiatch That's so messed up. Remind me not to put you in charge of anything else. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kmt_sesh Posted February 24, 2009 #258 Share Posted February 24, 2009 Wow, our merry band of sinners keeps growing. It's going to be a tight fit down there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dreamland Posted March 15, 2009 #259 Share Posted March 15, 2009 Sumerians were wearing Cross pattée ? You decide... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cross_patt%C3%A9e Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
legionromanes Posted March 15, 2009 #260 Share Posted March 15, 2009 Sumerians were wearing Cross pattée ? You decide... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cross_patt%C3%A9e in Assyria, that symbol represents Shamash, the sun god. here it is again on a different stele of the same king Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CausticGnostic Posted March 15, 2009 #261 Share Posted March 15, 2009 Heinlein, relying on an old theory from the 40s, used to refer to the asteroids as the remnants of an "exploded planet," calling them "Lucifer's bones." But while he was trained as an engineer, Heinlein was also a science fiction author. More recent astronomical theories, I believe, suggest that the asteroid belt did not result from the destruction of a planet but are leftover chunks of material that did not become a planet in the first place. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Puzzler Posted March 15, 2009 #262 Share Posted March 15, 2009 I watched Planet of the Apes last night, the newish one with Mark Wahlberg, all seen it have we? While watching it the part caught me where they are explaining their Ape God and their beginnings from 'time before time' at the area where the spaceship had crashed, and Seymour took over the men who were on Earth, this was the 'beginning' for the apes, the start of their existance....the time before time, the time of their God. Weird. Thinking of this on a parallel to man, could it be the same? Was it when we emerged from the subordination of another species or sub species, even a more dominant race? Is Sumeria the city of Gods and the first city a co-incidence? Or is it like the sacred area in Planet of the Apes? The place where we took control of our selves from a barbarian controller and introduced Gods, the place that became the start of a new civilisation, it's almost like you can read this same theme in the Bible recorded as ancient history. Is this what Sitchin was reading, just his interpretations may have been askew. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Puzzler Posted March 15, 2009 #263 Share Posted March 15, 2009 (edited) Sorry, accidently double posted. Edited March 15, 2009 by The Puzzler Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Puzzler Posted March 15, 2009 #264 Share Posted March 15, 2009 I always wondered if the fact the ancients thought that Venus was 2 seperate planets had anything to do with it all. Or maybe a returning comet. The moon story is interesting CS but I don't think it is mentioned at what time frame we would be looking at for this. It reminds me of the theories of Venus being hit by another celestial body, which oddly makes alot of sense, not only scientifically in the way it orbits and spins but also everything from the change in climate here in Earth c. 4000BC to a tilt in the Earth's axis being attributed to it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaylemurph Posted March 15, 2009 #265 Share Posted March 15, 2009 Heinlein, relying on an old theory from the 40s, used to refer to the asteroids as the remnants of an "exploded planet," calling them "Lucifer's bones." But while he was trained as an engineer, Heinlein was also a science fiction author. More recent astronomical theories, I believe, suggest that the asteroid belt did not result from the destruction of a planet but are leftover chunks of material that did not become a planet in the first place. Actually, the idea that the asteroid belt was an exploded planet is much. much older than the 1940s. It was the original theory for its existence, and dates back to at least the 19th Century. I always wondered if the fact the ancients thought that Venus was 2 seperate planets had anything to do with it all. ...the ancient thought Venus was to separate planets? I've never heard that. --Jaylemurph Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Puzzler Posted March 15, 2009 #266 Share Posted March 15, 2009 Actually, the idea that the asteroid belt was an exploded planet is much. much older than the 1940s. It was the original theory for its existence, and dates back to at least the 19th Century. ...the ancient thought Venus was to separate planets? I've never heard that. --Jaylemurph Yep, that was phrased really bad - I meant they thought that the Evening Star was a different planet to the Morning Star.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
legionromanes Posted March 15, 2009 #267 Share Posted March 15, 2009 Actually, the idea that the asteroid belt was an exploded planet is much. much older than the 1940s. It was the original theory for its existence, and dates back to at least the 19th Century. ...the ancient thought Venus was to separate planets? I've never heard that. --Jaylemurph pythagoras figured it out Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harte Posted January 7, 2020 #268 Share Posted January 7, 2020 On 2/22/2009 at 10:40 PM, jaylemurph said: *dries eyes after laughing If only it were for such as this that /I/ was going to hell. On the bright side, at least the conversation in hell will be good. Heaven only knows what the saint will discuss. --Jaylemurph Marching formations. Harte 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Piney Posted January 7, 2020 #269 Share Posted January 7, 2020 2 hours ago, Harte said: Marching formations. *Reason for necropost- Advanced senility* 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now