TheBloom Posted March 31, 2004 #1 Share Posted March 31, 2004 martian face take a look at this its oretty cool no? Not sure whether i believe it or not but it certinally looks pretty awesome! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jimma Posted March 31, 2004 #2 Share Posted March 31, 2004 Weve had this a few times before and I posted up some very recently released phottos of different lower orbit angles that show it is indeed just a large eroded weathered hill. Apparently NASA have been laughing at the suggestions it's a face since 1977! Sorry to all you desperate Alien hunters out there!!! I will try to find the photos and post them up again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jimma Posted March 31, 2004 #3 Share Posted March 31, 2004 Mind you, that could just be what they WANT us to know (for all you conspiracy theorists out there). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fearfulone Posted March 31, 2004 #4 Share Posted March 31, 2004 i dunno, seems kinda silly to me...i mean, we dont have a huge sculpture of humans on our planet...o wait...Mt. Rushmore, in the US...oh crap! The aliens are real! They're coming! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kryso Posted March 31, 2004 #5 Share Posted March 31, 2004 Good image. But then again, if you looking hard enough for something, you will find an image! I'm sure there will be a rock formation that looks like a rabbit up there if we spend enough time looking for it! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buddy_Hongster Posted March 31, 2004 #6 Share Posted March 31, 2004 People see what they what to see...i see a ninja in the picture..did anybody see a ninja ?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
babyforrest Posted March 31, 2004 #7 Share Posted March 31, 2004 So that's what an alien looks like? Looks kinda like a rock to me... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paraclete1 Posted March 31, 2004 #8 Share Posted March 31, 2004 WOW! I'll never look at that picture the same again. Don Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheBloom Posted March 31, 2004 Author #9 Share Posted March 31, 2004 like i said i dont believe it...i just thought its looked pretty awesome...yeh it looks like a rock to me too...just an obscure shaped rock, and apologies but i aint been on here in a while so i didnt notice that it had been posted before... thanx anyway guys Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Diebytheflyguy Posted March 31, 2004 #10 Share Posted March 31, 2004 (edited) i dunno, seems kinda silly to me...i mean, we dont have a huge sculpture of humans on our planet...o wait...Mt. Rushmore, in the US...oh crap! The aliens are real! They're coming! Well, besides Mt. Rushmore, there are "technically," faces on earth... Check the Crop Circles Faces Check the Rock Formation faces. IVE BEEN LOOKING FOR A WHILE... IM LOOKING FOR A HEAD FORMATION IN A MOUNTAIN (ON EARTH) IF ANYONE KNOWS WHAT IM TALKING ABOUT CAN YOU POST THE LINK/PICTURE... This is a pretty good website if your interested in Mars... They believe there is a Face, City and Pyramid... Face/ City and Pyramid on Mars This site says there is no face on Mars... The Explination of the face on Mars Also: Four Bob-sledders formation Goose rock formation Old lady and house formation Cowboy formation Did humans create these? No, so why would aliens make the faces on Mars. Edited March 31, 2004 by Diebytheflyguy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WorkMonkey Posted April 1, 2004 #11 Share Posted April 1, 2004 DUN DUN DUN!!!!!!! ROCK THAT LOOKS A BIT LIKE A FACE SHOCKER! READ ALL ABOUT IT Has anyone considered a third -- and far more likely -- scenario? Why would ancient Martians responsible for the great stonework (constructed circa 65-100 million years ago) depict primitive humans? Evidence shows that their civilization was in contact with another race of aliens at the time . . . a race crucial to the survival of the Martian species . . . a race we on Earth have only recently come to know as "the grays" . . . This is so funny, yes. Ancient martians who left no sign of their existance other than a rock sculpture is far more likely than natural erosion. Ahahah oh it gets better, I'd love to see this "evidense" not only prooves the existance of martians but also that they were in contact with another race of aliens. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swj20 Posted April 2, 2004 #12 Share Posted April 2, 2004 (edited) Hangar18, I hope this passes muster... Among the many candidates for Mars landing sites, Cydonia was proposed for both the Viking 2 and Pathfinder missions, but later ruled out. It does not have terrain or weather that is optimal. You want enough wind to spread material over rocks and rock-ejecta. Very small detail is camouflaged from above, and so few chances are taken. In addition, the key factors for the MER missions centered around landing safety, evidence for life and biomarkers, sediments, rock, and water. Cydonia is for some other time... Location http://www.geocities.com/swj20x2/NationalG...l?1080880489857 Closer In http://themis.la.asu.edu/fullimages/20020413a.jpg Closer Up. Mound is approximately 1 mile wide, 2 miles long. (1.6 km x 3.2 km) http://www.geocities.com/swj20x2/Cydonia1....l?1080862935979 There is enough H2O ice beneath the martian surface, at around 5-10 meters, to cover the planet ankle deep in water. The poles are covered in CO2 ice, with water below them, as well. Cydonia is not the wettest region. Here is a map that relates to hydrogen, and water beneath the surface. Included are the landing sites for Opportunity (O), in the middle, and Spirit (S), in the east, and Cydonia inside the box. The charts extend below, on the page, to include the obvious polar regions. In North vs. South, I'd put my money on the higher latitudes. http://www.geocities.com/swj20x2/CydoniaH2...l?1080856122322 Like other parts of the planet, the poles have errosion, like this animation of the North Pole. It is 6MB, so I have a stills-comparison, as well. http://marsprogram.jpl.nasa.gov/mgs/msss/c...it_animated.gif http://www.geocities.com/swj20x2/marserosi...l?1080859850112 The seasons on Mars have a theme- the orbit and the axial tilt. http://www.geocities.com/swj20x2/SeasonsMa...l?1080877859655 The results are notable, on the macro level, and at the smallest grains of dust. http://www.geocities.com/swj20x2/CydoniaDr...l?1080866389482 This volcanoe, Pavonis Mons, is around 2 times the height of Mt. Everest. It took only a few years to hide the crater beneath silt and dust. http://www.geocities.com/swj20x2/PavonisMo...l?1080887765529 Finally, not all changes are, in fact, explained by weathering and erosion. Some remain mysterious surprises! http://www.geocities.com/swj20x2/Hearts.ht...l?1080888821578 And just to end this on a happy note- http://www.geocities.com/swj20x2/Galle.htm...l?1080861834325 Edited April 2, 2004 by swj20 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swj20 Posted April 2, 2004 #13 Share Posted April 2, 2004 (edited) I uploaded too much, too fast to Yahoo. They should restore it later... Sorry about that... Larger View http://www.msss.com/mars_images/moc/4_6_98.../035a72.map.gif In the comparison below, the best Viking 1 (1977) image has been enlarged to 3.3 times its original resolution, and the Mars Orbiter Camera (1998) image has been decreased by a similar 3.3 times, creating images of roughly the same size. In addition, the MOC images have been geometrically transformed to a more overhead projection for ease of comparison with the Viking image. The left image is from Viking Orbiter 1, the middle image is a portion of MOC frame shown normally, and the far right image is the same MOC frame but with the contrast reversed to simulate the approximate lighting conditions of the Viking image. Compare Viking Orbiter picture, 1977; and Mars Orbiter, 1998. http://www.msss.com/mars_images/moc/4_6_98...ase/compare.gif Edited April 2, 2004 by swj20 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swj20 Posted April 2, 2004 #14 Share Posted April 2, 2004 One last thing. I have been through some of the datasets for the earliest NASA Mars Missions. That would include Mars Mariner 4 (1964), Mariner 6 (1969), and Mariner 7 (1969). Beyond that are the Viking orbiters/landers, a fraction of which I mentioned, in passing. Nonetheless, for anyone's consideration- most of the photographs of the early missions were of the eastern regions, and reportedly ~20% of the planet. The Viking missions, begun in 1975, really opened the Mars surface for mapping and photography. That said, a lot of changes, and erosion, could conceivably have occured between 1964 and 2001, the date of my largest images. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AbductingU Posted April 5, 2004 #15 Share Posted April 5, 2004 Great stuff guys!! One question about all the pits, especially thecircular ones?? Could they have been left by alien spacecraft?? I'm not trying to convince anyone of anything just want some opinions.. Jim Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Diebytheflyguy Posted April 6, 2004 #16 Share Posted April 6, 2004 Great stuff guys!! One question about all the pits, especially thecircular ones?? Could they have been left by alien spacecraft?? I'm not trying to convince anyone of anything just want some opinions.. Jim By circular ones do you mean the crop circles?... And if you do then yes some people believe they are formed when a spacecraft lands... People also believe they were made to direct other aliens to land on the crop circle "lading strip." These have also said to have been made by orbs that simple part the crops into the formations... While some believe aliens did these crop circles, others say it can be done by pranksters with planning, wood planks, and rope... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
artrox Posted July 21, 2004 #17 Share Posted July 21, 2004 Well, I am not skilled enough to set up a hyperlink or even add a pic of it here...frustrating...! But I am intrigued by the face on Mars! Do you think it's just a rock formation? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BurnSide Posted July 21, 2004 #18 Share Posted July 21, 2004 Closer pictures of the face were taken years ago and revealed it was only a small, flat rock formation which actually did not look one bit like a face. Not even close. The fact is that the picture where it looks like a face is taken from very very very far away, at an angle that casts shadows over it's landscape. Just a dry, barren rock. The pictures were disapointing. I'd find them but don't have access here at work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stellar Posted July 22, 2004 #19 Share Posted July 22, 2004 Good image. But then again, if you looking hard enough for something, you will find an image! I'm sure there will be a rock formation that looks like a rabbit up there if we spend enough time looking for it! Already found one actually Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
earthygirl04 Posted July 22, 2004 #20 Share Posted July 22, 2004 Hummm......I don't really know what to think of it, but the pictures were still cool. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cor_raven Posted July 23, 2004 #21 Share Posted July 23, 2004 (edited) Fake hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha i knew it uh any body know a good rehab center Edited July 23, 2004 by Magikman Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheBloom Posted July 23, 2004 Author #22 Share Posted July 23, 2004 (edited) Fake hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha i knew it uh any body know a good rehab center No but theres a good loony bin Edited July 23, 2004 by Magikman Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cor_raven Posted July 23, 2004 #23 Share Posted July 23, 2004 lonny bin better than nothing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheBloom Posted July 24, 2004 Author #24 Share Posted July 24, 2004 lonny bin better than nothing i didnt mean it was for you.....its for me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quirky Aussie Posted July 24, 2004 #25 Share Posted July 24, 2004 Here's another rock formation resembling a human face. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now