Jump to content
Join the Unexplained Mysteries community today! It's free and setting up an account only takes a moment.
- Sign In or Create Account -

WMDs in Iraq


Naveed

Were there ever any WMDs in Iraq?  

37 members have voted

  1. 1. Were there ever any WMDs in Iraq?

    • Yes.
      5
    • Yes, but they were moved or hidden in the desert.
      12
    • Yes, but they were destroyed.
      3
    • Yes, there was equipment to make them (biological or nuke).
      0
    • Yes, but the media is feeding us lies.
      2
    • No, there never were any.
      3
    • No, it was just Bush getting revenge for his father.
      3
    • No, it was just for oil.
      8
    • Why should I care?
      1


Recommended Posts

Titor you have some serious issues that you need to resolve. You are far too angry.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 
  • Replies 160
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Babs

    23

  • wunarmdscissor

    20

  • Titor

    18

  • stillcrazy

    18

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

As much as I agree that Titor is a little...extreme...I did find this very funny.

Q: But after we invaded them, we STILL didn't find any weapons of mass destruction, did we?

A: That's because the weapons are so well hidden. Don't worry, we'll find something, probably right before the 2004 election.

If you take out the extreme anger towards the US in general, there are some good points in his arguement...but he definately needs to tone it down a little tongue.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm allowed to be anti-American. I live in a free country. I can say WHAT I want, HOW I want and WHEN I want.

Yes, in the real world you would be correct. However, on this forum there is a limited tolerance for insults and hateful rhetoric. You'll need to contact Saruman to have your posting privileges re-instated. I see little reason in allowing this topic to continue, if anyone disagree's, notify Saruman with your concerns.

Magikman

Link to comment
Share on other sites

why would you compare Iraq to China and somehow use it as an excuse for why the war in Iraq shouldn't have happened? Its like saying because you don't donate to every single charity, you aren't doing any good donating to just one. I'm not attacking his overall point of view, however i really dislike the line of arguement he chose to pursue i this regards

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bathory, I agree with what your saying, and believe it or not, A lot of what Titor said, did have a fair amount of validity to it. But as with anyone else, bashing a person because they are living in a different country discounts any valid points that the person makes.

When we started this War on terror, and Bush announced that Iraq was one of the axis of evil countries, I really started to question motivation. Things like no bid contracts and such.

But when the 'reason for war' was Weapons of Mass Destruction, I really started to look into the politics of the whole thing. But my view still is that there may have been WMD's prior to the war, but Saddam was no fool and knew he was going down. What better way to start a global war between Islamic radicals, and the western cultures than to make the coalition look like war mongers.

In case anyone is interested, Saddam started practicing the Mulsim faith about four years ago in earnest, making sure he had the approval of the radical islamic people.

Edited by stillcrazy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just to add to titor's point abou maradonna,

While its true for the 2ND goal he handballed it into the net "the hand of god" moment.

He also scored the greatest goal ever scored for the first goal. BEating practically thr entire england team single handedly in the process.

Why is that a lot of english people forget that goal? tongue.gif

Anyway they beat you 2-0 get over it.lol

Edited by wunarmdscissor
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I also agree with you "stillcrazy' .let's not engage in any vilification of any person or country. We are veering from the topic of the post-WMD. Now coming back to that, it is definitely a surprise that nothing has been found as yet. with the occupation still in force for more than one year and all the resources at hand what prevents from finding this.even the ameriacn people are now sceptical aboout the whole purpose of going into this costly war. this has already created more radical muslims than it started out to elliminate. Will it be more safer for the USA in future?

I hope some WMD could be dug out some day just for salvaging the lost cause.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

why would you compare Iraq to China and somehow use it as an excuse for why the war in Iraq shouldn't have happened?

I actually agree this is a stupid comparrison tongue.gif Invading China would start an all out nuclear war...and I doubt even Bush is quite that stupid (then again, he wanted to attack Korea, which would probably have caused the same thing). As much as there are many other "evil regimes" that the US has turned a blind eye to when it suits them, I think China is one they can be forgiven for doing so huh.gif

Will it be more safer for the USA in future?

As US internatioal popularity is lower than it's ever been, and international terrorism is more common than it's ever been, I think it's safe to say that no, the war on Iraq was not safer for the future safety of the US: It was a cataclysmic blunder.

Edited by Seraphina
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just to add to titor's point abou maradonna,

While its true for the 2ND goal he handballed it into the net "the hand of god" moment.

He also scored the greatest goal ever scored for the first goal. BEating practically thr entire england team single handedly in the process.

Why is that a lot of english people forget that goal? tongue.gif

Anyway they beat you 2-0 get over it.lol

Yes, and i hope that the God´s hand help Maradona now...he is in the hospital for a heart attack... sad.gif

And Titor......are you still calentito? devil.gif

Chiba chiba....England can be the origin place of futbol, but Argentina is the place were you can get it in his more pure form....and Beckman is a patadura (hardleg) whistling2.giflaugh.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As US internatioal popularity is lower than it's ever been, and international terrorism is more common than it's ever been, I think it's safe to say that no, the war on Iraq was not safer for the future safety of the US: It was a cataclysmic blunder.

there is no real way to make things safer

i mean, all one has to do is to see whats happening in france to see that these radical groups can't be appeased, that said, i also feel that the removal of Saddam (and his Sons, don't forget those crazy b*******), will eventually have long term gains, although i guess its impossible to know for sure, either way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.