ExpandMyMind Posted June 2, 2009 #1 Share Posted June 2, 2009 The number of people living in England has overtaken the population density of Holland, which has traditionally been the most densely-populated major nation on the continent. The count, which has been attributed to higher levels of immigration, shows England now has 395 people per square kilometre. The figures were obtained in a parliamentary answer from the Office of National Statistics. In 2008 the average number of people per square kilometre in Britain was 253, rising to 395 in England. Read more... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevewinn Posted June 2, 2009 #2 Share Posted June 2, 2009 its no wonder we have social problems, were all packed in like john west sardines. this countries population should have never been allowed to rise above 50 million. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Princess Serenity Posted June 2, 2009 #3 Share Posted June 2, 2009 Dude. I'm sorry that England is so crowded. *Hugs Steve* Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
itsnotoutthere Posted June 2, 2009 #4 Share Posted June 2, 2009 England is most crowded, country in Europe.....hmmm, now I wonder why that would be!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
randym23 Posted June 2, 2009 #5 Share Posted June 2, 2009 somebody's not using their birth control. we have the same prob. in USA we just have more land! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Admiral Danger Posted June 2, 2009 #6 Share Posted June 2, 2009 thank goodness its not wales if england is as crowded as people say, i dont think that people can be fat (no offense to them) but in a crowded place like london, how the hell would you squeeze past the crowd without being slim? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Silver Thong Posted June 2, 2009 #7 Share Posted June 2, 2009 Ok that is damn crowded "395 people per square kilometre." compaired to 3.2 people per sq km in Canada. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
acidhead Posted June 2, 2009 #8 Share Posted June 2, 2009 Ok that is damn crowded "395 people per square kilometre." compaired to 3.2 people per sq km in Canada. Also, Canada has most of our population living in large cities close to the American border. We've got lots and lots of land....lots..... And the stinky Queen of England owns it all... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Admiral Danger Posted June 2, 2009 #9 Share Posted June 2, 2009 Also, Canada has most of our population living in large cities close to the American border. We've got lots and lots of land....lots..... And the stinky Queen of England owns it all... you sure it isnt the american government? i mean look at alaska, used to be part of canada, then usa bought the land. anyway, last time i heard the queen gave most of the land back to their own countries. i think she still owns the land of australia since she still visits the place as well as britain. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Silver Thong Posted June 2, 2009 #10 Share Posted June 2, 2009 Also, Canada has most of our population living in large cities close to the American border. We've got lots and lots of land....lots..... And the stinky Queen of England owns it all... Shhhhhhhh don't remind her Ya I personaly couldn't see my self living any further north than I am lol about 2 hours north of the Montana border. I was just thinking, Alberta or B.C. could probably fit about 3 or 4 Englands oh ya shhhhhhhhhhhhh lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Silver Thong Posted June 2, 2009 #11 Share Posted June 2, 2009 you sure it isnt the american government? i mean look at alaska, used to be part of canada, then usa bought the land. anyway, last time i heard the queen gave most of the land back to their own countries. i think she still owns the land of australia since she still visits the place as well as britain. Actually Alaska use to be Russia and the Americans bought it at about 2 cents an acre LOL what a deal that was.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chemical-licker Posted June 2, 2009 #12 Share Posted June 2, 2009 England is most crowded, country in Europe.....hmmm, now I wonder why that would be!!! dam that is an enigma. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hetrodoxly Posted June 2, 2009 #13 Share Posted June 2, 2009 In 2008 the average number of people per square kilometre in Britain was 253, rising to 395 in England. I assume that's the one's we know about? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hetrodoxly Posted June 2, 2009 #14 Share Posted June 2, 2009 dam that is an enigma. Someone left the gate open, who on earth could that be? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr.United_Nations Posted June 3, 2009 #15 Share Posted June 3, 2009 Jesus Christ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cradle of Fish Posted June 3, 2009 #16 Share Posted June 3, 2009 Whatever you do, don't come to Australia. We like our ratio of one person to every ten square KMs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
War Eagle Posted June 3, 2009 #17 Share Posted June 3, 2009 Always kind of wondered as a little fella how Britain (even my country of heritage Italy) could hold so many for so long on such small landmasses. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevewinn Posted June 3, 2009 #18 Share Posted June 3, 2009 Always kind of wondered as a little fella how Britain (even my country of heritage Italy) could hold so many for so long on such small landmasses. I like that image. puts things into perspective. The UK wants to get a grip of itself. 61 million and in 50 years time. 70+ million. the place is going to be alive with dead rats. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Silver Thong Posted June 3, 2009 #19 Share Posted June 3, 2009 Damn that does make Europe look kinda tiny LOL but in saying that I think Canada could fit 2 Australia's within our borders but who the hell wants to live in half of Canada, to damn cold in parts for me but I guess that goes for Australia as well to damn hot in parts lol. Europe seems to be bursting at the seems, time to go back and reclaim some Africa LOL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bender. Posted June 3, 2009 #20 Share Posted June 3, 2009 A new wave of colonialism may be in order! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
acidhead Posted June 3, 2009 #21 Share Posted June 3, 2009 Hands off Africa!!!!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ins0mniac Posted June 3, 2009 #22 Share Posted June 3, 2009 Sure we have a LOT more land. But it's mostly desert. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chemical-licker Posted June 3, 2009 #23 Share Posted June 3, 2009 Hands off Africa!!!!!!!! have i missed something, why? I can only guess because of all the trouble there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cradle of Fish Posted June 3, 2009 #24 Share Posted June 3, 2009 Sure we have a LOT more land. But it's mostly desert. I'd take the driest desert in the world over the UK any day. Chavs can't survive out there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hetrodoxly Posted June 3, 2009 #25 Share Posted June 3, 2009 I'd take the driest desert in the world over the UK any day. Chavs can't survive out there. So you're chaves are stuck on the coastal region. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now