Spineless Labour MPs who backed Asperger's

[chemical-licker]

BETRAYED: Spineless Labour MPs who backed Asperger's victim's bid to beat extradition desert him

Labour MPs were accused of hypocrisy last night after abandoning Gary McKinnon in his fight against extradition to the U.S.

Dozens had previously given written pledges of their support to the Asperger's Syndrome sufferer.

But only ten stuck to their guns and joined the Tories and Liberal Democrats in voting against the Government.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11...l#ixzz0LN5sjWSW

Dont worry we all have been let down by liebour.

[Splodgenessabounds]

Never mind, the guy commited a crime. Sending him to the US for trial will mean one less criminal in our overcrowded prisons.

I'm not feeling very sympathetic today. Hard day at work.

[chemical-licker]

Never mind, the guy commited a crime. Sending him to the US for trial will mean one less criminal in our overcrowded prisons.

I'm not feeling very sympathetic today. Hard day at work.

you keep it up, their are people out there who are relying on your hard work.

[itsnotoutthere]

This just goes to demonstrate the calibre of low life running this country at the moment.... Remind me, how many M.Ps have been prosecuted for fraud so far (re expenses) ?

Dictionary definition :- deceit, trickery, sharp practice, or breach of confidence,

perpetrated for profit or to gain some unfair or dishonest advantage.

[Bill Hill]

I kinda feel sorry for him.

he's been thrown to the wolves.

still, I guess he's not one of the 'untouchables... '

No, I'm not talking about Eliot Ness

[itsnotoutthere]

Yes, I wonder if the American government would be so amenable if the U.K. were trying to extradite a U.S. citizen. The whole thing stinks.

The next time Gordon meets Obama, he may just as well drop his trousers & bend over.

Edited July 16, 2009 by itsnotoutthere

[Bill Hill]

Yes, I wonder if the American government would be so amenable if the U.K. were trying to extradite a U.S. citizen. The whole thing stinks.

The next time Gordon meets Obama, he may just as well drop his trousers & bend over.

lol

[GreyWeather]

British politics have never had a spine anyway...

They had one once. With Winston Churchill.

[__Kratos__]

Wait, how is he the victim?

[itsnotoutthere]

Wait, how is he the victim?

There are no 'victims', thats what make this whole thing such a sham.

[stevewinn]

British politics have never had a spine anyway...

They had one once. With Winston Churchill.

spot on.

[__Kratos__]

There are no 'victims', thats what make this whole thing such a sham.

I could be wrong here but there was a good bit of damage done to the US systems... Wouldn't that make the person who has damaged property the victim and not the one who committed the act?

I mean, can I come over to your house and put a baseball bat through your front windows then claim I'm the victim of your wanting justice when I'm arrested because jail will effect my life plans? So because I don't plan or want to go to jail, it's my human right not to be punished by being sent to jail?

Edited July 16, 2009 by __Kratos__

[itsnotoutthere]

I could be wrong here but there was a good bit of damage done to the US systems... Wouldn't that make the person who has damaged property the victim and not the one who committed the act?

I mean, can I come over to your house and put a baseball bat through your front windows then claim I'm the victim of your wanting justice when I'm arrested because jail will effect my life plans? So because I don't plan or want to go to jail, it's my human right not to be punished by being sent to jail?

Er...yes you are wrong. Looking at files on a computer doesn't cause hundreds of thousands of dollars worth of damage. The only victims here are the embarrassed military i.t. muppets who couldn't write a decent firewall to protect their servers. any costs involved were probably to employ outside i.t. consultants to put right what these guys should have done in the first place.

I listened to an interview on the radio with somebody high up in the american military who admitted that this sort of hacking is detected all the time, but in this case they were gonna make an example.

It's a show case. Its easier to go for this guy because they know that our spineless prime minister is compliant, it's a bit more difficult to extradite someone from china & they wouldn't want to upset the chinese would they now.

(p.s. I'm 100% certain that you would have a different view if it were the chinese trying to extradite a U.S. citizen on similar charges)

Edited July 16, 2009 by itsnotoutthere

[hetrodoxly]

British politics have never had a spine anyway...

They had one once. With Winston Churchill.

Maggie Thatcher, no matter what you thought of her she had balls.

[GreyWeather]

Maggie Thatcher, no matter what you thought of her she had balls.

Ah yeah, that's true.

Okay then, I'll fix my previous statement.

The UK parliament have never had a spine.

They have always bended over backwards - Chamberlin anyone? For instance. Apart from Churchill and Thatcher, who did. The UK's parliament have only ever been interested in their own reality and selves, and never on the integrity of the honour and valor of the country.

Edited July 16, 2009 by GreyWeather

[stevewinn]

From 1720 to about 1890 the prime ministers were great.

Sir Robert Walpole 1720.

William Pitt 1804.

William Ewart Gladstone: 1809, (a bloody good'un)

Robert Banks Jenkinson, 2nd Earl of Liverpool, 1812 (he was a cracker).

Arthur Wellesley The Duke of Wellington 1828 (they don't make them like this no more)

Charlie grey 1830

Good old Winston Churchill 1940

Clement Atlee 1945

Maggie Thatcher 1979

then a shower of ****e. begin. bliar- Brown.